no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Rookie Area / What to do with this guy thread... Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 3 183 184 185 > >| | |
| Poster | Message |
|
sotko
|
posted: 2017-03-11 21:02:28 (ID: 100099806) Report Abuse |
|
Blocking is 12.5. He is still in my YA.
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
CheramieIII
|
posted: 2017-03-11 21:12:09 (ID: 100099810) Report Abuse |
|
sotko wrote:
All of his numbers look really good. I would have a problem getting rid of him especially if he could stay another year in my YA and I could build his skills. I would build his catching and probably use him as a WR.Blocking is 12.5. He is still in my YA. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Rock777
|
posted: 2017-03-11 22:25:42 (ID: 100099814) Report Abuse |
|
Are we still talking about the guy who is red capped at 42 speed?
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
CheramieIII
|
posted: 2017-03-11 22:47:39 (ID: 100099817) Report Abuse |
|
yes
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Rock777
|
posted: 2017-03-11 23:04:28 (ID: 100099823) Report Abuse |
|
If he was in my academy he would have been cut a long time ago, but a younger team may have less to work with. I would play him at TE before I put a guy that slow at WR. QB or P would be other options for him. Might be worth some more on the TM if you make him look like a QB (assuming his talent is fairly high).
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2017-03-11 23:14:42 (ID: 100099825) Report Abuse | |
|
SPE: 42.3 (red)
Stanford87 wrote:
Making him a MLB depends on whether you are blitzing a lot, he is certainly too slow to do that, No SPE: 42.3 (red) is not "too slow to do that". My three MLBs in S24 Marius Pouliquen SPE 36,1 (cap) 16 sacks Zachary Kieffer SPE 39 (cap) 8 sacks Ismaël Marin SPE 39,3 (near cap) 7 sacks Normal is just relative. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2017-03-11 23:34:13 (ID: 100099830) Report Abuse | |
|
Rock777 wrote:Are we still talking about the guy who is red capped at 42 speed?
Rock777 wrote:
If he was in my academy he would have been cut a long time ago, but a younger team may have less to work with. I would play him at TE before I put a guy that slow at WR. S24 / Statistical Leaders / catch TD / all D1 leagues N°1 has 31 TD N°17 has 21 TD (Logan Dumoulin) S24 / Statistical Leaders / catch TD / Dragons 1.1 N°1 has 27 TD N°6 has 21 TD (Logan Dumoulin) Logan Dumoulin is one of my WRs. SPE 40,7 (cap) That's even less than "that slow". Furthermore, he certainly is an idiot (INT 25,4). |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Rock777
|
posted: 2017-03-12 03:48:28 (ID: 100099842) Edits found: 4 Report Abuse |
|
So your guy gets playing time. TDs don't really mean much. Drop Rate and Interceptions Created and YAC are far more informative. Are you saying you would rather have a dumb slow receiver than a fast smart one...? I'd put him somewhere where his speed doesn't matter as much. He doesn't have good WR traits, so its really bad advice to suggest he put the player at WR. BTW, a little weak for my tastes, but I agree he is quick enough for MLB.
All I was saying, is that with physicals as low as that, the guy never would have red capped in my youth academy. Too many better options available for 5K on the TM. This is what my caps look like for my senior youths: STR - - - SPD - - - INT - - - TW - Project Position 45.4 - - - 50.0 - - - 27.3 - - - 49.0 - - - FB (pass Blocker) 45.6 - - - 47.5 - - - 37.3 - - - 50.0 - - - SF (Track Star) 49.6 - - - 44+ - - - 37.4 - - - 40.0 - - - TE 50.0 - - - 35+ - - - 34.7 - - - 50.0 - - - DT (Sure Tackler) 44.5 - - - 46+ - - - 34.4 - - - 42.0 - - - P (Strong Leg) 49.6 - - - 37+ - - - 47.7 - - - 50.0 - - - K (Strong Leg) 44.6 - - - 50.0 - - - 21.4 - - - 45.0 - - - RB (Track Star) 49+ - - - 36+ - - - 26.3 - - - 50.0 - - - OL or DL unk - - - unk - - - 50.0 --- 50..0 --- unknown until I find caps Recent grads (last 2 seasons): 48.6 --- 40.5 --- 50.0 --- 43.0 --- QB 40.6 --- 49.5 --- 44.5 --- 49.0 --- WR 44.3 --- 50.0 --- 24.3 --- 40.0 --- RB 49.6 --- 40+ --- 30.4 --- 49.0 --- OL (Pass Blocker) 50.0 --- 41+ --- 28.2 --- 50.0 --- OL 50.0 --- 36.3 --- 39.8 --- 48.0 --- OL (Track Star) 49.6 --- 41.5 --- 33.6 --- 49.0 --- TE (Track Star) 45.1 --- 47.6 --- 33.4 --- 41.0 --- LB (Sure Tackler) --- 6th string 41.3 --- 48.6 --- 39.3 --- 43.0 --- CB (Strong Arm) --- On cut list In general, including traits, I try to get at least one physical over 49. I'd also try to get smarter guys than I have on my list. Most of my smart guys washed out in recent years due to low physicals. Last edited on 2017-03-12 04:26:36 by Rock777 |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2017-03-12 05:12:50 (ID: 100099844) Report Abuse | |
|
Rock777 wrote:
So your guy gets playing time. TDs don't really mean much. Drop Rate and Interceptions Created and YAC are far more informative. Are you saying you would rather have a dumb slow receiver than a fast smart one...? I'd put him somewhere where his speed doesn't matter as much. He doesn't have good WR traits, so its really bad advice to suggest he put the player at WR. BTW, a little weak for my tastes, but I agree he is quick enough for MLB. All I was saying, is that with physicals as low as that, the guy never would have red capped in my youth academy. Too many better options available for 5K on the TM. This is what my caps look like for my senior youths: STR - - - SPD - - - INT - - - TW - Project Position 45.4 - - - 50.0 - - - 27.3 - - - 49.0 - - - FB (pass Blocker) 45.6 - - - 47.5 - - - 37.3 - - - 50.0 - - - SF (Track Star) 49.6 - - - 44+ - - - 37.4 - - - 40.0 - - - TE 50.0 - - - 35+ - - - 34.7 - - - 50.0 - - - DT (Sure Tackler) 44.5 - - - 46+ - - - 34.4 - - - 42.0 - - - P (Strong Leg) 49.6 - - - 37+ - - - 47.7 - - - 50.0 - - - K (Strong Leg) 44.6 - - - 50.0 - - - 21.4 - - - 45.0 - - - RB (Track Star) 49+ - - - 36+ - - - 26.3 - - - 50.0 - - - OL or DL unk - - - unk - - - 50.0 --- 50..0 --- unknown until I find caps Recent grads (last 2 seasons): 48.6 --- 40.5 --- 50.0 --- 43.0 --- QB 40.6 --- 49.5 --- 44.5 --- 49.0 --- WR 44.3 --- 50.0 --- 24.3 --- 40.0 --- RB 49.6 --- 40+ --- 30.4 --- 49.0 --- OL (Pass Blocker) 50.0 --- 41+ --- 28.2 --- 50.0 --- OL 50.0 --- 36.3 --- 39.8 --- 48.0 --- OL (Track Star) 49.6 --- 41.5 --- 33.6 --- 49.0 --- TE (Track Star) 45.1 --- 47.6 --- 33.4 --- 41.0 --- LB (Sure Tackler) --- 6th string 41.3 --- 48.6 --- 39.3 --- 43.0 --- CB (Strong Arm) --- On cut list In general, including traits, I try to get at least one physical over 49. I'd also try to get smarter guys than I have on my list. Most of my smart guys washed out in recent years due to low physicals. I love it when specialists try to speculate whereas facts and figures just show they are wrong. Rock777 wrote:Are you saying you would rather have a dumb slow receiver than a fast smart one...? No.
Rock777 wrote:He doesn't have good WR traits, so its really bad advice to suggest he put the player at WR. I did not.
You told what you would (not) have done. I told what I did. One question for you "what to do with this guy". I have a player with SPE 40,7 (cap) and INT 25,4. Can't he play as WR, what do you suggest ? I know you think "Interceptions Created are more informative" than TDs. So I'd like to let you know that my team has ONE interception (S24, all official games). I guess my "dumb slow receiver" did not help... I do not expect any answer to my question. BU Terriers / sotko, League: Galaxy 2.1, joined the game: 2016-12-24 / S24. He needs reliable information. Nothing else. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Rock777
|
posted: 2017-03-12 05:19:15 (ID: 100099845) Report Abuse |
|
And you are giving bad info. Just because your 32 year old veteran with 4* experience can catch the ball, doesn't mean a guy with more intelligence and speed wouldn't be better.
This is a perfect example of an anecdotal fallacy. One years stats for one veteran player is not "facts and figures". Its an anecdote. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 3 183 184 185 > >| | |
| Main / Rookie Area / What to do with this guy thread... | |
