no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
Main / Suggestions / Rivalries Search Forum | |
Navigation: |< < 1 2 4 5 6 > >| | |
Rating: | |
Poster | Message |
Admin
Contact |
posted: 2012-03-30 07:09:35 (ID: 34118) |
jack6 wrote:
OK, back to topic. I like the linking idea, but then you need a prio list to not having dozents of rivalries. As suggested: use only the top X, based on win/loss ratio...finally it is something you want to brag with... |
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
Sisko
|
posted: 2012-03-30 07:16:47 (ID: 34120) Report Abuse |
"Manager XY endet the friendship cause the win/loss ratio wasn't in his favor"
Serious: It's cool, there seems to be a way to implement it quite quickly. And yes, althought I REALLY like the idea of naming the rivalries, there's some potential to abuse it... But a rivalry-icon would be cool. Like clashing helmets or something... May be this guy from the Dusty Springfield song "Son of a Preachie Man" has an idea. |
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
Admin
Contact |
posted: 2012-03-30 07:21:33 (ID: 34121) |
LOL
|
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
posted: 2012-03-30 13:00:27 (ID: 34150) Report Abuse | |
Does not misunderstand me, but this meant: If I play often against a team which is in my Friendly list on occasion, then this team becomes my rival.
I think, that´s wrong. For me the rivals are the 3 teams which are in my division. Since against that I must fight every season to become a division winner. Or do I misunderstand something? |
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
Admin
Contact |
posted: 2012-03-30 13:07:39 (ID: 34153) |
that's the question how everyone is defining a rivalry...for me it is the friendlist, for other it is the division...
|
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
scottishbronco
|
posted: 2012-03-30 13:14:53 (ID: 34154) Report Abuse |
i think it should be based on competitive games played against the same teams.
0-5 games could be "non rivals" 6-10 grudge match 11-15 do or die match 16+ big rivalry or something similar |
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
posted: 2012-03-30 13:24:04 (ID: 34160) Report Abuse | |
Admin wrote:
that's the question how everyone is defining a rivalry...for me it is the friendlist, for other it is the division... Then we need a rivalry-button or a second friendship list, lets say a rivalry list or a chance to switch some teams in the friendly-list from "friend" to "rival". |
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
Admin
Contact |
posted: 2012-03-30 14:30:05 (ID: 34164) |
Kottan wrote:
Admin wrote:
that's the question how everyone is defining a rivalry...for me it is the friendlist, for other it is the division... Then we need a rivalry-button or a second friendship list, lets say a rivalry list or a chance to switch some teams in the friendly-list from "friend" to "rival". This means additional database stuff, which causes longer times before such a thing could come true - with my suggestion we could avoid the waiting for the database designer... |
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
Sisko
|
posted: 2012-03-30 14:37:45 (ID: 34165) Report Abuse |
Admin wrote:
Kottan wrote:
Admin wrote:
that's the question how everyone is defining a rivalry...for me it is the friendlist, for other it is the division... Then we need a rivalry-button or a second friendship list, lets say a rivalry list or a chance to switch some teams in the friendly-list from "friend" to "rival". This means additional database stuff, which causes longer times before such a thing could come true - with my suggestion we could avoid the waiting for the database designer... To be perfectly honest: I think it would be worth waiting... It's nothing we're really missing, so the 100% option seems to be more attractive than the "hurried compromiss"... |
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
Admin
Contact |
posted: 2012-03-30 14:47:27 (ID: 34166) |
No problem with that
|
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
reply Mark this thread unread | |
Navigation: |< < 1 2 4 5 6 > >| | |
Main / Suggestions / Rivalries |