no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Suggestions / A different Deep Chart Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< 2 3 4 5 > >| | |
| Rating: | |
| Poster | Message |
|
panoramix
|
posted: 2012-05-10 00:19:52 (ID: 39097) Report Abuse |
|
(and a different match setting)
On the Deep chart: - specific player position (RLB, LLB, RDE, LDE...) On the Match settings: - single fitness percentage of substitution in a single role (see DC) So, if I want, I can play with the same player on the same position only few snaps or the whole game. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
andrew2scott2
|
posted: 2012-05-10 02:05:04 (ID: 39099) Report Abuse |
|
A more in-depth depth chart would be nice to have.
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2012-05-10 06:20:59 (ID: 39104) Report Abuse | |
|
aehm, fixing players on positions is not wanted yet.
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
alexshans84
|
posted: 2012-05-10 06:21:32 (ID: 39105) Report Abuse |
|
+1000, but this question was raised a few months ago and AFAIR it was declined as leading to exploits
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
andrew2scott2
|
posted: 2012-05-10 10:30:56 (ID: 39138) Report Abuse |
|
but not with the out of position penitently active that should not be an issue.
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2012-05-10 11:03:32 (ID: 39139) Report Abuse | |
|
It is not fixed to avoid dark wing situations, where you buy one strong player and fix his position on the field. This is not related to out of position penalties...
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
alexshans84
|
posted: 2012-05-10 11:09:28 (ID: 39143) Report Abuse |
|
pete wrote:
It is not fixed to avoid dark wing situations, where you buy one strong player and fix his position on the field. Can you explain this, please? |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2012-05-10 11:17:18 (ID: 39144) Report Abuse | |
|
alexshans84 wrote:
pete wrote:
It is not fixed to avoid dark wing situations, where you buy one strong player and fix his position on the field. Can you explain this, please? if we allow you to play a play on a dedicated position, you could use one sided formation, on onesided rosters. Therefore, we refuse to enable such features. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
alexshans84
|
posted: 2012-05-10 11:35:50 (ID: 39148) Report Abuse |
|
pete wrote:
alexshans84 wrote:
pete wrote:
It is not fixed to avoid dark wing situations, where you buy one strong player and fix his position on the field. Can you explain this, please? if we allow you to play a play on a dedicated position, you could use one sided formation, on onesided rosters. Therefore, we refuse to enable such features. As now if I put my best players on top of DC they all play on the left side, so I can use "dark wing". Yes, when they are tired they are substituted by other guys, but if the first ones are tired they are already not the best option. So question is: what's changing with suggested DC related "dark wing" situations? Sorry, but I can't understand it  |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2012-05-10 12:14:28 (ID: 39149) Report Abuse | |
|
alexshans84 wrote:
pete wrote:
alexshans84 wrote:
pete wrote:
It is not fixed to avoid dark wing situations, where you buy one strong player and fix his position on the field. Can you explain this, please? if we allow you to play a play on a dedicated position, you could use one sided formation, on onesided rosters. Therefore, we refuse to enable such features. As now if I put my best players on top of DC they all play on the left side, so I can use "dark wing". Yes, when they are tired they are substituted by other guys, but if the first ones are tired they are already not the best option. So question is: what's changing with suggested DC related "dark wing" situations? Sorry, but I can't understand it You gave yourself the answer. Now there is no real control who is filling which position. But with this add-on there would be such a control mechanism. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< 2 3 4 5 > >| | |
| Main / Suggestions / A different Deep Chart | |
