no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Discussions / The laugh-out-loud Column Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 10 11 12 > >| | |
| Poster | Message |
| posted: 2012-06-25 14:31:42 (ID: 45444) Report Abuse | |
|
Nogard wrote:
1 yard, not 99 99yard run in 5 seconds respect   |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Tarjan
|
posted: 2012-06-25 15:41:01 (ID: 45448) Report Abuse |
|
Kicking 24.1 Strength 44+
till now 3 Fieldgoals missed 26, 27, 28 Yards and still 1,5 Quarters to go ^^ and the same guy never ever missed a PAT ... in 3 Seasons.... |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Sisko
|
posted: 2012-06-25 18:06:37 (ID: 45463) Report Abuse |
|
Buffalo wrote:
1:08 1 and goal to go on opp 1, Terentiy Kopylov (OC) snaps the ball to George Belanger (QB), Emile Simons (HB/R) gets the ball, he starts running over the right tackle, Emile Simons (HB/R) fumbles, but recovers the ball, forward progress: 1 yards (Wishbone vs. 3-4-4) 1:03 touchdown A fumble recovery for a TD. Unbelivable! A 99-yard fumble recovery TD would have been better for me.  Somewhere back in my head I remember a NFL rule which forbids fumbling forward (in the last 2 minutes)... Do we have this here? |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
slider6
|
posted: 2012-06-25 18:12:53 (ID: 45465) Report Abuse |
|
Sisko wrote:
Buffalo wrote:
1:08 1 and goal to go on opp 1, Terentiy Kopylov (OC) snaps the ball to George Belanger (QB), Emile Simons (HB/R) gets the ball, he starts running over the right tackle, Emile Simons (HB/R) fumbles, but recovers the ball, forward progress: 1 yards (Wishbone vs. 3-4-4) 1:03 touchdown A fumble recovery for a TD. Unbelivable! A 99-yard fumble recovery TD would have been better for me. Somewhere back in my head I remember a NFL rule which forbids fumbling forward (in the last 2 minutes)... Do we have this here? I think the rule is something like it can only be recovered by the fumbling player. If anyone else recovers then it comes back to the spot of the fumble. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2012-06-25 18:22:53 (ID: 45469) Report Abuse | |
|
Sisko wrote:
Somewhere back in my head I remember a NFL rule which forbids fumbling forward (in the last 2 minutes)... Do we have this here? Hm, could you post a link? No, there is no such rule in the engine |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
dark_wing
|
posted: 2012-06-25 18:25:21 (ID: 45470) Report Abuse |
|
Some information from Here
A.R. 11.1 Third-and-goal on B2. Runner A1 goes to the goal line with the ball over the plane of the goal line. He is tackled, fumbles, and the defensive team recovers in the end zone. Ruling: Touchdown. The ball is automatically dead at the instant of legal player possession on the opponent’s goal line. So if fumble was in the end zone - it is touchdown. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Turtlemania
|
posted: 2012-06-25 18:26:17 (ID: 45471) Report Abuse |
|
pete wrote:
Hm, could you post a link? No, there is no such rule in the engine Always the same every time it is NFL rulebook the best source "old man" http://www.nfl.com/rulebook/fumble |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Sisko
|
posted: 2012-06-25 18:27:03 (ID: 45472) Report Abuse |
|
pete wrote:
Sisko wrote:
Somewhere back in my head I remember a NFL rule which forbids fumbling forward (in the last 2 minutes)... Do we have this here? Hm, could you post a link? No, there is no such rule in the engine Here you go... It says: "If any player fumbles after the two-minute warning in a half, only the fumbling player is permitted to recover and/or advance the ball. If recovered by any other offensive player, the ball is dead at the spot of the fumble unless it is recovered behind the spot of the fumble. In that case, the ball is dead at the spot of recovery." |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2012-06-25 18:31:10 (ID: 45473) Report Abuse | |
|
what a non-sense,IMO. Do we really need ti implement this, or can we put that on our list of rule exceptions? I mean, is this considered to be important?
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Firenze
|
posted: 2012-06-25 18:36:56 (ID: 45475) Report Abuse |
|
I didn't know that rule existed.
I wouldn't bother implementing it, it would only serve to complicate things. We'd rather have more fundamental aspects of the sim addressed first (Improved specials teams, 2pt conversions etc...) |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 10 11 12 > >| | |
| Main / Discussions / The laugh-out-loud Column | |
