no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Suggestions / Transfer Tax - a sliding scale Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 >| | |
| Rating: | |
| Poster | Message |
|
sh8888
|
posted: 2012-05-23 14:16:02 (ID: 42087) Report Abuse |
|
JonnyP wrote:
Yes from me if it means removing the the 16k start price limit. But I vote No if the 16k starting price limit stays, as for me that already does enough to deter daytrading at any meaningful level. I think we're in danger of mixing two or three things ..... This proposal is about a sliding tax (paid by the seller) I've already done a suggestion where the $16k starting price limit goes down to a $1k price limit (to simplify things). If you want the $16k starting price limit to be raised you'd need to create a unique suggestion (or did I misunderstand) ..... I doubt if Admin would like it ...as I think the low ($16k) limit is purely for anti-cheating purposes. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
dark_wing
|
posted: 2012-05-23 16:56:52 (ID: 42101) Report Abuse |
|
sh8888 wrote:
dark_wing wrote:
mental bomb from me! who have to pay the tax? Seller or buyer?  Stays exactly the same as now (i.e seller pays the tax) .... but now tax is 5% flat fee ....under this proposal tax will be 25% on a sliding scale down to 5%. So ... dark-wing .... your $113,113,113 purchase would still have cost you ...... $113,113,113  But, all transfered draftees from the last draft - 25% from buyer, as my royalty! Last edited on 2012-05-23 18:04:13 by dark_wing |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
JonnyP
|
posted: 2012-05-23 18:03:21 (ID: 42114) Report Abuse |
|
sh8888 wrote:
JonnyP wrote:
Yes from me if it means removing the the 16k start price limit. But I vote No if the 16k starting price limit stays, as for me that already does enough to deter daytrading at any meaningful level. I think we're in danger of mixing two or three things ..... This proposal is about a sliding tax (paid by the seller) I've already done a suggestion where the $16k starting price limit goes down to a $1k price limit (to simplify things). If you want the $16k starting price limit to be raised you'd need to create a unique suggestion (or did I misunderstand) ..... I doubt if Admin would like it ...as I think the low ($16k) limit is purely for anti-cheating purposes. I'm combining them because I believe they need to be linked... either you have freedom to list at whatever you want, but be taxed.. or you leave it as it is, with no sliding tax. To combine the 2 is overkill imho. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 >| | |
| Main / Suggestions / Transfer Tax - a sliding scale | |
