no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Discussions / Running QB s Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 >| | |
| Poster | Message |
|
Chareos
|
posted: 2013-06-23 08:42:41 (ID: 99340) Report Abuse |
|
that's an approach i like, but there also should be the possibility of failure
the QB thinks the def is defending the pass and runs although the D is set up for the run defense |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
MonteDrago
|
posted: 2013-06-23 09:28:29 (ID: 99343) Report Abuse |
|
Chareos wrote:
that's an approach i like, but there also should be the possibility of failure the QB thinks the def is defending the pass and runs although the D is set up for the run defense I think that can make with Vision. If Vision low then the percentage change he make the wrong Play is higher!. (and a little bit change to make wrong play is ever  ) |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
dgrid
|
posted: 2013-06-23 20:53:21 (ID: 99381) Report Abuse |
|
hmm, I do see the advantage of the QB choice style. I was originally just thinking how simple adding the percentage drop-down would be to program.
Chareos wrote:
that's an approach i like, but there also should be the possibility of failure the QB thinks the def is defending the pass and runs although the D is set up for the run defense well then the Def outsmarted the QB, in that case, and is realistic! Last edited on 2013-06-23 20:53:37 by dgrid |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 >| | |
| Main / Discussions / Running QB s | |
