no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Suggestions / in game suggestions Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 >| | |
| Rating: | |
| Poster | Message |
| posted: 2012-07-01 09:37:22 (ID: 46112) Report Abuse | |
|
Sorry, I had no time to think about it yet, this is why I put the threadid on Todo as well, so I can walk through the opinions later, when writing this stuff.
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Buffalo
|
posted: 2012-07-22 09:03:31 (ID: 48715) Report Abuse |
|
pete wrote:
I put that thread on todo... Clock management, Fake punts, TPC, Onsidekicks from this tread are in todo. I think that the 2-pt conversion is absolutly needed. It is more important than 2 pts of a safety. Yesterday I probably lost my PO-game, because of this missing option. I was 8 points behind in the 4th quarter and scored a TD in the last play of the game. In reality every team would try the 2pt conversion to tie the game. I think this was not the only game with such and end. In the Supercup Sinner Lad Tromso lost by one point. I hope it will be not so difficult to implement such and option. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
slider6
|
posted: 2012-07-22 17:22:39 (ID: 48752) Report Abuse |
|
There is a problem with 2 Pt Conversion though. The score breakdowns (ahead 7-10, behind 4-6, etc) would have to be changed.
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Buffalo
|
posted: 2012-07-23 06:43:06 (ID: 48789) Report Abuse |
|
slider6 wrote:
There is a problem with 2 Pt Conversion though. The score breakdowns (ahead 7-10, behind 4-6, etc) would have to be changed. On page 1 of this thread I wrote the situations when the 2-pt-conversion could be allowed. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
slider6
|
posted: 2012-07-23 16:24:46 (ID: 48842) Report Abuse |
|
Buffalo wrote:
slider6 wrote:
There is a problem with 2 Pt Conversion though. The score breakdowns (ahead 7-10, behind 4-6, etc) would have to be changed. On page 1 of this thread I wrote the situations when the 2-pt-conversion could be allowed. I know that, but I'm trying to get at how you would structure your playbook to work for trying to get a TD when you are down 8 as opposed to when you are down 9 or 10. I said something about it in this thread, but Pete never weighed in. My tactics are going to change drastically if I'm down 7 (or 8 with the ability for a 2 pt conversion) as opposed to if I'm down 8-10 (or 9-11 with 2 pt conversion). But the option in the playbook is 7-11, which is way wrong. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
ryandinho
|
posted: 2012-07-24 13:19:34 (ID: 48952) Report Abuse |
|
It might be an unfair amount of work on Pete's behalf but maybe it's possible to get us to enter a numeric value in the playbook. So there would be 'To Go [] and []' rather than 'To Go 7-10'.
Audibles could rely on the experience and intelligence of a team, or of specific positions. It could be the collective unit on the field since it only takes 1 player to false start (when penalties are introduced) or it could focus on the QB/WR/Center. There are also defensive audibles as well to factor in which aren't always thought of. If anyone remembers Peyton Manning against Ray Lewis it was fascinating to watch. I like all the suggestions but the fake punts/field goals would be well down the list of things to do though in terms of those. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
TombKing
|
posted: 2012-07-24 13:23:31 (ID: 48954) Report Abuse |
|
ryandinho wrote:
...If anyone remembers Peyton Manning against Ray Lewis it was fascinating to watch... Often referred to as "The Chicken Dance".  |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
slider6
|
posted: 2012-07-24 16:18:58 (ID: 48974) Report Abuse |
|
ryandinho wrote:
It might be an unfair amount of work on Pete's behalf but maybe it's possible to get us to enter a numeric value in the playbook. So there would be 'To Go [] and []' rather than 'To Go 7-10'. Oh, I LIKE this idea!  |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Warlord99
|
posted: 2013-01-21 03:08:21 (ID: 77595) Report Abuse |
|
slider6 wrote:
ryandinho wrote:
It might be an unfair amount of work on Pete's behalf but maybe it's possible to get us to enter a numeric value in the playbook. So there would be 'To Go [] and []' rather than 'To Go 7-10'. Oh, I LIKE this idea! It would certainly reduce the lines in the offensive and defensive playbooks |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 >| | |
| Main / Suggestions / in game suggestions | |
