no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Suggestions / Be able to trade Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 3 12 14 > >| | |
| Rating: | |
| Poster | Message |
|
hosh13
|
posted: 2012-08-09 06:12:46 (ID: 51151) Report Abuse |
|
Just another thought on a rating system for players. Another benefit of this could be to associate a max amount of money that a player can be initially listed at by the owner.
This would have the effect of livening the TM up since managers do not risk getting peanuts for good players. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
alexshans84
|
posted: 2012-09-02 06:57:16 (ID: 54864) Report Abuse |
|
If it wasn't suggested, why we can't make trades with the following restriction:
1) only one-to-one 2) trading players have to have a contract with the same length (for ex. both have contracts expiring at season end) 3) difference in wages of trading players must be not more than 10 (or 15, 20) %. It would be active only for managers with activated contract mode |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
hosh13
|
posted: 2012-09-02 07:58:14 (ID: 54868) Report Abuse |
|
alexshans84 wrote:
If it wasn't suggested, why we can't make trades with the following restriction: 1) only one-to-one 2) trading players have to have a contract with the same length (for ex. both have contracts expiring at season end) 3) difference in wages of trading players must be not more than 10 (or 15, 20) %. It would be active only for managers with activated contract mode Looks alright to me. Not sure about 2 though - why should the contract lengths be the same? |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
bwadders76
|
posted: 2012-09-02 08:03:55 (ID: 54869) Report Abuse |
|
alexshans84 wrote:
If it wasn't suggested, why we can't make trades with the following restriction: 1) only one-to-one 2) trading players have to have a contract with the same length (for ex. both have contracts expiring at season end) 3) difference in wages of trading players must be not more than 10 (or 15, 20) %. It would be active only for managers with activated contract mode I dont like that bit. In fact I dont like any restrictions on who can and can not trade. The problem with 3 is that teams needs may be different. For example I may want Cameroon Turtles waxed up 4th choice RB to improve my senior side but he may want a player from my YA as my senior players wont benefit him. It's an improvement on only serious sides can trade though. Last edited on 2012-09-02 08:04:42 by bwadders76 |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
alexshans84
|
posted: 2012-09-02 08:15:05 (ID: 54872) Report Abuse |
|
hosh13 wrote:
alexshans84 wrote:
If it wasn't suggested, why we can't make trades with the following restriction: 1) only one-to-one 2) trading players have to have a contract with the same length (for ex. both have contracts expiring at season end) 3) difference in wages of trading players must be not more than 10 (or 15, 20) %. It would be active only for managers with activated contract mode Looks alright to me. Not sure about 2 though - why should the contract lengths be the same? You pay for the player with 500 wage and 1 season contract less than for the player with the same wage and 2 seasons contract in total. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
alexshans84
|
posted: 2012-09-02 08:17:15 (ID: 54873) Report Abuse |
|
bwadders76 wrote:
The problem with 3 is that teams needs may be different. For example I may want Cameroon Turtles waxed up 4th choice RB to improve my senior side but he may want a player from my YA as my senior players wont benefit him. I didn't understand this part, please, explain it for me |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
bwadders76
|
posted: 2012-09-02 08:22:46 (ID: 54875) Report Abuse |
|
alexshans84 wrote:
bwadders76 wrote:
The problem with 3 is that teams needs may be different. For example I may want Cameroon Turtles waxed up 4th choice RB to improve my senior side but he may want a player from my YA as my senior players wont benefit him. I didn't understand this part, please, explain it for me I picked the turtles because he's one of the better sides here. If someone puts up their 4th choice RB for trade and a newer side thinks that this player could improve his team he will offer a trade. Of the senior players he has they would probably not improve a good side so they may want a player from the YA. The wages are going to be massively different |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
holmeboy
|
posted: 2012-09-02 08:23:52 (ID: 54877) Report Abuse |
|
He means say I have a back up 27yo RB that you need and he earns 10k. And you have a 19yo youth academy player that I like. While it would suit both sides (you get your starting RB you need and I get a player with a lot of potential) we cannot trade because the 19yo might only have a salary of 1k.
If that makes sense |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
alexshans84
|
posted: 2012-09-02 08:35:19 (ID: 54880) Report Abuse |
|
Thank you both, I see now. But trades mechanism should be simple, based on pure maths and protected of cheating. I suggest something with the above mentioned criteria in mind. In your example there are great cheating potential imo.
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
hosh13
|
posted: 2012-09-02 09:07:17 (ID: 54887) Report Abuse |
|
=SUM(D2;E2;F2;G2;O2;P2;Q2) + (30 - T2) * (S2 + 50) / 10 * 1.2
This is what's in my spreadsheet for rating players at age 30. The 7 variables in SUM are Physicals, pos,vis,int and Foot. T2 = age S2 = TW. You can also add in position specific skills on top of that of course, and then weight everything for specific positions. You now have a way to compare players of all ages. If you wanted to do a really good job, you could study all trades to date and compare them to this rating to associate a price with every position and every rating. Then you could set a % limitation for trades i.e. both players must be within a certain % of each other according to their ratings. You could do the same with money, and if a number of players hit the ceiling, you have some sort of a tie breaker. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 3 12 14 > >| | |
| Main / Suggestions / Be able to trade | |
