no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Suggestions / Suggestion: Playbook - Separate Tabs For Each Quarter Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< 2 > >| | |
| Rating: | |
| Poster | Message |
|
canonico
|
posted: 2012-08-12 22:50:10 (ID: 52111) Report Abuse |
|
Like the title says, it gets some what confusing to have all plays from every Quarter in the same tab.
This creates a long list of plays to scan through when you want to make changes to specific plays that are beeing called, now I know you can see in which quarter they are beeing called at the left part of your screen, and you can sort them by quarter, but it still gets some what confusing at times, adding Tabs to each Individual Quarter would make it more clean and easy to deal playbook in my opinion. The space is there to add icons if this is even a option to add to the Playbook. Example:  Source: http://i50.tinypic.com/vq5cud.png |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
canonico
|
posted: 2012-08-13 02:07:12 (ID: 52115) Report Abuse |
|
Also let me add that we could have an option to copy the 1st Quarter Playbook to the 2nd Quarter or 3rd,4th and OT Playbook. Be it with the Export/Import feature, or with a Copy Paste feature. This will help save time and create a better game dinamic in my opinion.
Example:  Source: http://i46.tinypic.com/156edrb.png |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2012-08-13 07:23:31 (ID: 52136) Report Abuse | |
|
Does this make sense? I mean, the playbook has to be viewed as whole thing to check, if the rules match or not. Splitting them into quarters could interrupt this view
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
canonico
|
posted: 2012-08-13 07:59:38 (ID: 52140) Report Abuse |
|
pete wrote:
Does this make sense? I mean, the playbook has to be viewed as whole thing to check, if the rules match or not. Splitting them into quarters could interrupt this view How so Pete? 
The way i see it the rules would apply the same way as they apply now to the playbook, diference is, it would be easier to check and change the actual plays from each individual Quarter Tabs. After having them set in each individual Quarter, they would translate like the user left them to the Playbook as a whole. Small example: User would create lets say 10 plays for the 1st Quarter in the 1st Quarter Playbook Tab, then s e l e c t the ones he want on top just like we do now. Same for the 2nd Quarter and for all the other Quarters in each individual Tab. Then those rules would be carried to the playbook as a whole but already with them selected like a user left them from top to bottom. The copy paste feature would be something that could help with this part to. QPG = Quarter Playbook PB = Playbook Could be used to [Copy 1st QPB] to [Main PB] (Or something like this) Or if it carrys automaticaly even better. The only diference this suggestion is wanting to make is to have an easier way to deal with a large playbook, because it does get tricky and complicated, a guy gets lost in the middle of all those play calls, and this would make it easier. Probably would help owners to change their playbook calling more often to. Or maybe not. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
dark_wing
|
posted: 2012-08-13 09:00:14 (ID: 52145) Report Abuse |
Bad idea. My playbook looks like. q1 downX distance<XX etc... q2 downX distance<XX etc... q3 downX distance<XX etc... But filters for playbook - is good idea. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2012-08-13 09:00:57 (ID: 52146) Report Abuse | |
|
dark_wing wrote:
Bad idea. My playbook looks like. q1 downX distance<XX etc... q2 downX distance<XX etc... q3 downX distance<XX etc... But filters for playbook - is good idea. That is what I meant with "interrupted view" |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Ranagol
|
posted: 2012-08-13 14:14:30 (ID: 52159) Report Abuse |
|
I've already made such a suggestion. It never really got any attention though.
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2012-08-13 14:22:45 (ID: 52160) Report Abuse | |
|
Must have missed yours, sorry!
But the answer/question from me is the same |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
hosh13
|
posted: 2012-08-13 14:48:38 (ID: 52164) Report Abuse |
|
Yeah, I find it a little frightening to not have everything on one page so that you can see what will happen b4 something else.
But the present situation is just as frightening I suppose if someone ends up with a long playbook. I suppose if you needed to page down 4 times to see your PB anyway that this might not be such a bad idea? I think what we probably want is a special bits and pieces section and a general section. And then a way to compare and see overlap/order. Another nice feature would be a way to see the holes i.e. a way to see, at a glance, what situations are not covered in the playbook. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
canonico
|
posted: 2012-08-13 16:30:48 (ID: 52175) Report Abuse |
|
dark_wing wrote:
Bad idea. My playbook looks like. q1 downX distance<XX etc... q2 downX distance<XX etc... q3 downX distance<XX etc... But filters for playbook - is good idea. I know, still gets confusing tho. But i guess it is just me..  |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< 2 > >| | |
| Main / Suggestions / Suggestion: Playbook - Separate Tabs For Each Quarter | |
