no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Suggestions / Need too many CBs Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< 2 3 4 5 > >| | |
| Rating: | |
| Poster | Message |
|
hosh13
|
posted: 2012-09-13 04:19:18 (ID: 56545) Report Abuse |
|
It just occured to me that we need too many CBs in this game atm.
You really need at least 6 - 4 for the 4CB formation, an allowance for 1 injured b4 the game and then another during it. And we need at least 4 SFs - so that's 10 DBs all up. Too many? Sould we simply have DBs? Or maybe allow 2 DBs per team that can play CB or SF without the position penalty? |
|
| posted: 2012-09-13 05:50:21 (ID: 56548) Report Abuse | |
|
hosh13 wrote:
It just occured to me that we need too many CBs in this game atm. You really need at least 6 - 4 for the 4CB formation, an allowance for 1 injured b4 the game and then another during it. And we need at least 4 SFs - so that's 10 DBs all up. Too many? Sould we simply have DBs? Or maybe allow 2 DBs per team that can play CB or SF without the position penalty? I have 6 CBs and 4 SFs on my depth chart and I don't feel like I miss players on other positions. It's a management game, you know? I can understand your request, but I think this would make the game a little bit easier or let's say more autopilot. |
|
|
bwadders76
|
posted: 2012-09-13 05:52:10 (ID: 56549) Report Abuse |
|
jack6 wrote:
hosh13 wrote:
It just occured to me that we need too many CBs in this game atm. You really need at least 6 - 4 for the 4CB formation, an allowance for 1 injured b4 the game and then another during it. And we need at least 4 SFs - so that's 10 DBs all up. Too many? Sould we simply have DBs? Or maybe allow 2 DBs per team that can play CB or SF without the position penalty? I have 6 CBs and 4 SFs on my depth chart and I don't feel like I miss players on other positions. It's a management game, you know? I can understand your request, but I think this would make the game a little bit easier or let's say more autopilot. Our Australian friend likes autopilot. It's a shame you cant see who has suggested what that would prove my point 
|
|
|
bwadders76
|
posted: 2012-09-13 05:53:46 (ID: 56550) Report Abuse |
|
The idea though Im very undecided at the moment. Its definately one of your better ideas but can't decide if its poor or just plain s****
No, honestly I think it's ok |
|
|
hosh13
|
posted: 2012-09-13 06:07:13 (ID: 56553) Report Abuse |
|
It's not really that big of a deal, but NFL teams typically do not have or need 10 DBs.
IRL, there are plenty of CB/FS hybrids. Most FSs are ex CBs and when they get older and fatter they become SSs. 
Look at Ronnie Lott's career. Rod Woodson, etc. So how about CBs can play SF without penalty, but not the other way around? Thinking on that.................. That would mean you'd have all CBs and no SFs. And then the SF coach is not needed. But then if a CB plays SF in a game he does not get the in game bonus unless there is a SF coach. And there would still be a chem/morale penalty to change position from CB to SF and vice-versa so you'd still need/want a SF coach.  |
|
|
bwadders76
|
posted: 2012-09-13 06:09:53 (ID: 56554) Report Abuse |
|
hosh13 wrote:
It's not really that big of a deal, but NFL teams typically do not have or need 10 DBs. IRL, there are plenty of CB/FS hybrids. Most FSs are ex CBs and when they get older and fatter they become SSs.
Look at Ronnie Lott's career. Rod Woodson, etc. So how about CBs can play SF without penalty, but not the other way around? Thinking on that.................. That would mean you'd have all CBs and no SFs. And then the SF coach is not needed. But then if a CB plays SF in a game he does not get the in game bonus unless there is a SF coach. And there would still be a chem/morale penalty to change position from CB to SF and vice-versa so you'd still need/want a SF coach. Are you trying to make me redundant? I'm here to ridicule your suggestions I don't need your input thank you |
|
|
hosh13
|
posted: 2012-09-13 06:19:12 (ID: 56555) Report Abuse |
|
Actually, 11 DBs are needed. 5 SFs and 6 CBs to cover the 4-1-6 and 3-3-5 properly.
BTW, if I had a DC with 5 DL and 1 gets injured during the game, and then the 5-3-3 or 5-2-4 is called, what happens? Random player? |
|
|
bwadders76
|
posted: 2012-09-13 06:37:54 (ID: 56558) Report Abuse |
|
hosh13 wrote:
Actually, 11 DBs are needed. 5 SFs and 6 CBs to cover the 4-1-6 and 3-3-5 properly. BTW, if I had a DC with 5 DL and 1 gets injured during the game, and then the 5-3-3 or 5-2-4 is called, what happens? Random player? not entirely sure to be honest but I think the engine picks someone |
|
|
alexshans84
|
posted: 2012-09-13 07:00:01 (ID: 56563) Report Abuse |
|
hosh13 wrote:
BTW, if I had a DC with 5 DL and 1 gets injured during the game, and then the 5-3-3 or 5-2-4 is called, what happens? Random player? If you have other DL in your roster and if there's place in DC, he will play AFAIK |
|
|
sh8888
|
posted: 2012-09-13 07:02:03 (ID: 56564) Report Abuse |
|
hosh13 wrote:
It just occured to me that we need too many CBs in this game atm. Maximum number of Players on Senior Roster = 70 Maximum number of Players on Depth Chart = 55 use the maximum(s) ...... it's more than enough. 
Last edited on 2012-09-13 07:08:17 by sh8888 |
|
| Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< 2 3 4 5 > >| | |
| Main / Suggestions / Need too many CBs | |
