no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Suggestions / Need too many CBs Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 3 4 >| | |
| Rating: | |
| Poster | Message |
|
hosh13
|
posted: 2012-09-13 17:44:32 (ID: 56683) Report Abuse |
|
I know you probably don't play the 3-3, but did you realize that if you did and get a FS injured ingame, that you could have anyone playing FS?
|
|
| posted: 2012-09-13 17:48:20 (ID: 56684) Report Abuse | |
|
Nogard wrote:
55 ingame injuries and every team will be in trouble... that´s football  Damn, did not think this way so far...you are right...Let's kick OOP  |
|
|
bwadders76
|
posted: 2012-09-13 17:48:28 (ID: 56685) Report Abuse |
|
hosh13 wrote:
From the manual - "If you create an incorrect Depth chart (too few players, too many players, no Depth chart) the engine will create an Ingame Depth chart (IDC) for you. In case you have too few or no players in your Depth chart, the engine will fill the IDC with randomly selected guys out of your roster and use them for playing the game. In case you have too many players in your Depth chart, the engine will cut the IDC until it meets the maximum roster count." So then if we do not put the entire 55 players in the DC then the engine chooses the remainder for us. So if you do not have enough CBs/SFs in the DC to cover ingame injuries, and you call 4-1/3-3, then you are in a lot of trouble!  That could apply to any position though not just your CB / SF If you have a starter and cover for each position in your DC thats 22 offensive 22 defensive and 4 ST that leaves 7 spots to account for cover. Most people only have 2 ST players in their DC so most teams have 9 cover spots. 1 x QB 1 x FB/HB 1 x OL 2 x WR 1 x DL 1 x LB 1 x CB 1 x SF There you go that will cover every position with enough depth that if you are unlucky enough to suffer multiple injuries in the same position you still have it covered. |
|
|
sfniner08
|
posted: 2012-09-13 17:49:34 (ID: 56686) Report Abuse |
|
I in fact do play the 3-3-5. If you are concerned with injuries, then put your 2 starting fs and 2 starting ss like you would normally. Then back them up with each other. So your fs dc would be FS, FS, and then include the 2 SS.
Do the same for SS if you like. |
|
|
sh8888
|
posted: 2012-09-13 17:56:11 (ID: 56687) Report Abuse |
|
sfniner08 wrote:
I in fact do play the 3-3-5. If you are concerned with injuries, then put your 2 starting fs and 2 starting ss like you would normally. Then back them up with each other. So your fs dc would be FS, FS, and then include the 2 SS. Do the same for SS if you like. at last .... it's taken 5 pages, but I knew that somebody would eventually succeed in making a sensible statement. The only thing that this whole thread has done (apart from sending everyone to sleep  ) is to show that the original poster hadn't read the manual regarding the Depth Chart.
I think the minimum number of stars that you can give a Suggestion is 1, shame .... if minus stars were possible, this Suggestion would be the natural recipient  |
|
|
Nogard
|
posted: 2012-09-13 17:58:29 (ID: 56688) Report Abuse |
|
The fact is, it is no real suggestion. normally this thread is home in the rookie forum.
|
|
|
bwadders76
|
posted: 2012-09-13 17:59:07 (ID: 56689) Report Abuse |
|
sh8888 wrote:
sfniner08 wrote:
I in fact do play the 3-3-5. If you are concerned with injuries, then put your 2 starting fs and 2 starting ss like you would normally. Then back them up with each other. So your fs dc would be FS, FS, and then include the 2 SS. Do the same for SS if you like. at last .... it's taken 5 pages, but I knew that somebody would eventually succeed in making a sensible statement. The only thing that this whole thread has done (apart from sending everyone to sleep ) is to show that the original poster hadn't read the manual regarding the Depth Chart.
I think the minimum number of stars that you can give a Suggestion is 1, shame .... if minus stars were possible, this Suggestion would be the natural recipient 1 star would be an upgrade on his usual suggestions |
|
|
sh8888
|
posted: 2012-09-13 18:00:25 (ID: 56690) Report Abuse |
|
bwadders76 wrote:
1 star would be an upgrade on his usual suggestions Are you being serious ?  |
|
|
hosh13
|
posted: 2012-09-13 18:00:42 (ID: 56691) Report Abuse |
|
sfniner08 wrote:
I in fact do play the 3-3-5. If you are concerned with injuries, then put your 2 starting fs and 2 starting ss like you would normally. Then back them up with each other. So your fs dc would be FS, FS, and then include the 2 SS. Do the same for SS if you like. Yes, I already knew that. But does everyone else? I have actually been playing with 3SFs that way (the same 3 SFs as SS and FS), but if one was hurt I'm down to 2 SFs total and in trouble. |
|
|
Admin
Contact |
posted: 2012-09-13 18:01:06 (ID: 56692) |
|
As we are now completely off-topic, I will close this suggestion. Finally it was answered by me. Thanks to hosh for going the challenging way and posting about ideas, no reason to make a laughter out of it.
|
|
| Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 3 4 >| | |
| Main / Suggestions / Need too many CBs | |
