no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Suggestions / Leagues reorganization. Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 3 4 5 > >| | |
| Rating: | |
| Poster | Message |
|
holmeboy
|
posted: 2012-10-15 17:43:09 (ID: 61770) Report Abuse |
|
I'm not really into this idea.
On one hand it would help newer teams in a sense as they will more than likely be playing in a league with similar strength teams so rather than getting hammered it'll be much more competitive... But in the long run it'll be harder and harder to reach the top league when your starting down in league 4.x/5.x so it's exasperating a problem people keep trying to make suggestions for. And it would kind of make Cup of Champions obsolete... |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
dark_wing
|
posted: 2012-10-15 18:01:46 (ID: 61775) Report Abuse |
|
For strong teams.
Do You have a fun then You win with score 57-10 or 41-3??? For not so strong teams. Do You have a fun then You lose with score 57-10 or 41-3??? |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
dark_wing
|
posted: 2012-10-15 18:03:26 (ID: 61776) Report Abuse |
|
I don't speek about scores like 121-10, or 117-3 etc...
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2012-10-15 19:12:38 (ID: 61790) Report Abuse | |
|
dark_wing wrote:
Leagues reorganization. How about news structure of the leagues? So my idea is. 1 Top-league. (1.1) (32 teams) 2 Level 2 leagues (2.1 and 2.2) (total 64 teams) 4 Level 3 leagues (3.1 – 3.4) (total 128 teams) etc All leagues plays using “NFL-based” system. Like now. Promotion/relegation system - like now. It is like this, and the regions are there to spread the workload during simulation. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
dark_wing
|
posted: 2012-10-15 19:25:35 (ID: 61794) Report Abuse |
|
pete wrote:
dark_wing wrote:
Leagues reorganization. How about news structure of the leagues? So my idea is. 1 Top-league. (1.1) (32 teams) 2 Level 2 leagues (2.1 and 2.2) (total 64 teams) 4 Level 3 leagues (3.1 – 3.4) (total 128 teams) etc All leagues plays using “NFL-based” system. Like now. Promotion/relegation system - like now. It is like this, and the regions are there to spread the workload during simulation. I think, it can be solved. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
sneaky_minotaur
|
posted: 2012-10-15 20:36:50 (ID: 61809) Report Abuse |
|
dark_wing wrote:
Leagues reorganization. How about news structure of the leagues? So my idea is. 1 Top-league. (1.1) (32 teams) 2 Level 2 leagues (2.1 and 2.2) (total 64 teams) 4 Level 3 leagues (3.1 – 3.4) (total 128 teams) etc All leagues plays using “NFL-based” system. Like now. Promotion/relegation system - like now. I like this idea a lot. 
There really should be at least 3 levels of league play. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
sneaky_minotaur
|
posted: 2012-10-15 20:47:08 (ID: 61810) Report Abuse |
|
holmeboy wrote:
I'm not really into this idea. On one hand it would help newer teams in a sense as they will more than likely be playing in a league with similar strength teams so rather than getting hammered it'll be much more competitive... But in the long run it'll be harder and harder to reach the top league when your starting down in league 4.x/5.x so it's exasperating a problem people keep trying to make suggestions for. I don't know, I'd look at it as having something to strive for; a goal. I think the problem people keep trying to make suggestions to fix is how to structure leagues so they are more competitive, instead of older teams just hammering the newer ones. 
I'd rather have a good hard climb to the top league with competitive games along the way rather than make it to the top quick and then get hammered for a few seasons until your team develops enough to compete. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
MTS1972
|
posted: 2012-10-15 22:15:04 (ID: 61817) Report Abuse |
|
sneaky_minotaur wrote:
I don't know, I'd look at it as having something to strive for; a goal. I think the problem people keep trying to make suggestions to fix is how to structure leagues so they are more competitive, instead of older teams just hammering the newer ones.
I'd rather have a good hard climb to the top league with competitive games along the way rather than make it to the top quick and then get hammered for a few seasons until your team develops enough to compete. Very well put and exactly right IMO. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
bwadders76
|
posted: 2012-10-16 00:39:53 (ID: 61828) Report Abuse |
|
MTS1972 wrote:
sneaky_minotaur wrote:
I don't know, I'd look at it as having something to strive for; a goal. I think the problem people keep trying to make suggestions to fix is how to structure leagues so they are more competitive, instead of older teams just hammering the newer ones.
I'd rather have a good hard climb to the top league with competitive games along the way rather than make it to the top quick and then get hammered for a few seasons until your team develops enough to compete. Very well put and exactly right IMO. totally agree. However, I believe I have seen a previous post where it was suggested being able to move leagues or merge leagues and Pete said it wasnt possible because of the database. Im not techno geek but if the database prevents it then it is what it is. If Im wrong and have misread the post then |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
hosh13
|
posted: 2012-10-16 01:09:44 (ID: 61832) Report Abuse |
|
The SB champ is THE CHAMP (and all in the 1 season - yipee!) and we can get rid of CofC! Last edited on 2012-10-16 01:12:30 by hosh13 |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 3 4 5 > >| | |
| Main / Suggestions / Leagues reorganization. | |
