no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Discussions / Franchise Contracts... Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 3 4 > >| | |
| Poster | Message |
|
sfniner08
|
posted: 2012-10-29 19:41:14 (ID: 64407) Report Abuse |
|
120 tackles and 9 misses for 93 % rate.
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
canonico
|
posted: 2012-10-29 19:53:04 (ID: 64410) Report Abuse |
|
sfniner08 wrote:
120 tackles and 9 misses for 93 % rate. Humm, I just scouted a LB'er from one of teh best 1.1 teams. He has 29 in tackling, he had 147 Tackles and 24 missed for a 86% rate, so it does make a diference, but does it payoff? I'm torned, but slightly inclined to say it doesn't. PS: Thanks for sharing his stats. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
bwadders76
|
posted: 2012-10-29 20:01:41 (ID: 64412) Report Abuse |
|
canonico wrote:
sfniner08 wrote:
120 tackles and 9 misses for 93 % rate. Humm, I just scouted a LB'er from one of teh best 1.1 teams. He has 29 in tackling, he had 147 Tackles and 24 missed for a 86% rate, so it does make a diference, but does it payoff? I'm torned, but slightly inclined to say it doesn't. PS: Thanks for sharing his stats. If those 15 extra missed tackles ended up in the end zone then yes it very much pays off |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2012-10-29 20:33:17 (ID: 64423) Report Abuse | |
|
bwadders76 wrote:
canonico wrote:
sfniner08 wrote:
120 tackles and 9 misses for 93 % rate. Humm, I just scouted a LB'er from one of teh best 1.1 teams. He has 29 in tackling, he had 147 Tackles and 24 missed for a 86% rate, so it does make a diference, but does it payoff? I'm torned, but slightly inclined to say it doesn't. PS: Thanks for sharing his stats. If those 15 extra missed tackles ended up in the end zone then yes it very much pays off What you need to consider is not what his tackling rate is...but what his tackling rate is against playoff-type competition. Maybe both LBs make all the tackles against lesser teams, but those are teams you're going to beat anyway....even with some missed tackles. But against the better teams with better RBs & receivers, were the score is tight, then maybe the stub LB tackles at 90% and the other guy at 70%. That's when it really matters... Steve SD Blitz |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
canonico
|
posted: 2012-10-29 20:46:52 (ID: 64425) Report Abuse |
|
Solana_Steve wrote:
bwadders76 wrote:
canonico wrote:
sfniner08 wrote:
120 tackles and 9 misses for 93 % rate. Humm, I just scouted a LB'er from one of teh best 1.1 teams. He has 29 in tackling, he had 147 Tackles and 24 missed for a 86% rate, so it does make a diference, but does it payoff? I'm torned, but slightly inclined to say it doesn't. PS: Thanks for sharing his stats. If those 15 extra missed tackles ended up in the end zone then yes it very much pays off What you need to consider is not what his tackling rate is...but what his tackling rate is against playoff-type competition. Maybe both LBs make all the tackles against lesser teams, but those are teams you're going to beat anyway....even with some missed tackles. But against the better teams with better RBs & receivers, were the score is tight, then maybe the stub LB tackles at 90% and the other guy at 70%. That's when it really matters... Steve SD Blitz Sure, that is true, but I meantioned this player I scouted was on a top team in 1.1, so it's not like he is facing soft competition, this team was in at least one final game. And to add to that, I just scouted two LB's from the team that won everything last season. LB - Tackling 28.6 - 110 Tackles - 36 Missed - 76% LB - Tackling 38.8 - 100 Tackles - 16 Missed - 86.2% (has Special Trait if Sure Tackler) Naturaly this is a very microscopic sample size, but I am not sold on the fact that training a skill so high pays off. But it«s a personal opinion, nothing else. PS: I also know tackling isn't the only skill that matters when making a tackle. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2012-10-29 20:48:06 (ID: 64426) Report Abuse | |
|
canonico wrote:
PS: I also know tackling isn't the only skill that matters when making a tackle. IMO that's the real topic |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2012-10-29 21:22:25 (ID: 64437) Report Abuse | |
|
pete wrote:
Tackling matters not. Look at me. Judge me by my tackling, do you? Hmm? Hmm. And well you should not. For my ally is the Force, and a powerful ally it is. Desimone....the force is strong with this one! Steve SD Blitz Last edited on 2012-10-29 21:23:17 by Solana_Steve |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
devastations
|
posted: 2012-10-29 21:34:10 (ID: 64445) Report Abuse |
|
I think a regression analysis would come in handy on judging the importance of skills. I guess a sample of 30 players would be enough. (maybe I'll give it a shot one time when my exams approach)
However there are some things that will be difficult to integrate. When you would judge a RB for example you can't integrate formations (offensive & defensive) nor the exact strength of the OL or the opposing defense). Some tricks to avoid those externalities is to only pick RB's from the same league & only the stats from league games. That way the rushing stats will normalize. For a RB I would certainly include: strength, speed, positioning, carrying, footwork, vision, agility. Not every variable will be explaining the average rushing yards though (or that's what we expecting) Maybe I'll give it a try in January or earlier, depends on how fast I'll learn my course econometrics. (maybe we won't learn anything at all) |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2012-10-29 21:49:23 (ID: 64453) Report Abuse | |
|
Solana_Steve wrote:
pete wrote:
Tackling matters not. Look at me. Judge me by my tackling, do you? Hmm? Hmm. And well you should not. For my ally is the Force, and a powerful ally it is. Desimone....the force is strong with this one! Steve SD Blitz Not remember I do posting this...  |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
bagss
|
posted: 2012-10-29 22:11:40 (ID: 64464) Report Abuse |
|
pete wrote:
Not remember I do posting this... The dark side clouds everything.  |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 3 4 > >| | |
| Main / Discussions / Franchise Contracts... | |
