no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Discussions / Draft Positions... Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< 2 3 > >| | |
| Poster | Message |
| posted: 2012-11-07 21:05:00 (ID: 67132) Report Abuse | |
|
What determines how many players at each position is in the draft? Just random?
Our next draft has 9 QBs (which only one is needed at a time) versus 5 OLs (which five are required). Seems like that is terribly skewed? Shouldn't there be roughly proportional positions...even if its a little random. 96 * 1 / (11 + 11 + 6) = ~3.4 QBs and 96 * 5 / (11 + 11 + 6) = ~17.1 OLs?? I don't know...maybe more WRs, DBs to accommodate formations loaded with those positions (Dime, Shotgun 4WRs etc.). Steve SD Blitz |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Nogard
|
posted: 2012-11-07 21:15:52 (ID: 67134) Report Abuse |
 Sry I have a smile in my face. I discussed that topic yesterday with pete  |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2012-11-08 00:08:42 (ID: 67146) Report Abuse | |
|
Did I miss the thread?
Steve SD Blitz |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2012-11-08 08:33:30 (ID: 67178) Report Abuse | |
|
It was via PM...
So here we go again, public now We just took the average players per position group on the field, and maintended this ratio in the draft. Then we made some small tweaks, since it resulted in too many STers as example, and too many OLers...This creates a basic array of positions (something like QB,QB,RB,RB,OL,OL,OL,WR...), and we pick from this array one position per created player. This will be more or less the ratio again, but of course there might be small movements on it. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Tarjan
|
posted: 2012-11-08 08:43:22 (ID: 67180) Report Abuse |
|
17 WR in Fire 1.1 seems a little bit high
 and 11 QB   Last edited on 2012-11-08 08:45:06 by Tarjan |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
dark_wing
|
posted: 2012-11-08 08:57:32 (ID: 67181) Report Abuse |
|
Tarjan wrote:
17 WR in Fire 1.1 seems a little bit high and 11 QB With the new engine it is super! |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Tarjan
|
posted: 2012-11-08 09:05:26 (ID: 67183) Report Abuse |
|
Not if you allready drafted those players season ago
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Nogard
|
posted: 2012-11-08 11:02:45 (ID: 67207) Report Abuse |
|
Solana_Steve wrote:
Did I miss the thread? Steve SD Blitz F*** I miss the part "via PM" in my first post.I thought I wrote it. I´m sorry. Maybe I find time tonight to translate my thoughts I wrote to pete and bring them into the discussion. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Tarjan
|
posted: 2012-11-08 11:34:23 (ID: 67210) Report Abuse |
|
send them per pm
easier to read |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Nogard
|
posted: 2012-11-08 11:56:56 (ID: 67217) Report Abuse |
|
you understand sächsisch?
  Last edited on 2012-11-08 11:57:06 by Nogard |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< 2 3 > >| | |
| Main / Discussions / Draft Positions... | |
