no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Discussions / Match Engine Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 3 4 6 > >| | |
| Poster | Message |
|
TombKing
|
posted: 2012-11-18 11:05:09 (ID: 68868) Report Abuse |
|
I can't complain. I'm quite satisfied with how things are going so far
 |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2012-11-18 11:13:22 (ID: 68869) Report Abuse | |
|
I love changes. Then I have to respond, and the game is active and interesting. In games where absolutely nothing happens, then this games will be dull with time.
Therefore I wish and demand changes and improvements from time to time. Thanks Kottan |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
JonnyP
|
posted: 2012-11-18 12:33:54 (ID: 68876) Report Abuse |
|
Kottan wrote:
I love changes. Then I have to respond, and the game is active and interesting. In games where absolutely nothing happens, then this games will be dull with time. Therefore I wish and demand changes and improvements from time to time. Thanks Kottan Yes yes and yes again.... The match engine is looking much better than the previous one.. in terms of big plays, all Pete needs to do now is somehow find a way of allowing the defense to make tackles 15-50 yards downfield so that every breakaway does not result in a TD. BUT.... for 4-5 seasons, safeties and corners, and to a slightly lesser extent linebackers, have been neglected positions in RZA. How many of us prioritised DL to try to stuff the previously dominant running game? How many teams put their best allround defensive players at MLB/OLB/DE instead of SS? I've been playing teams who are trying to field a dime all day against 4WR but who only have 3-4 CBs on their roster, equally how do you expect a defense to play 30-40 snaps in 3-3-5 when you only have a couple of capable safeties? I have a receiver for example with 48+ speed/41+ strength/30+ agility/ 30+catching/ 30+ positioning/20+ carrying? How many teams have a CB capable of single coverage on a guy like that? He would need to be double teamed. So what options are there? Missed tackles delay the receiver more? Maybe the tackle is only partially 'missed', the CB has hold of the wideout, but struggles to bring him down, then a FS comes steaming in? Maybe intelligent DBs team tackle a receiver - one stands him up, the other takes his legs? Or maybe they start to knock the receiver out of bounds rather than actually bring him down? Then of course there are the much needed adjustments to blitzing. These are all options. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
dark_wing
|
posted: 2012-11-18 17:20:12 (ID: 68888) Report Abuse |
|
So, at the begining of the next season we will play with new not-tested engine...
 |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2012-11-18 17:23:11 (ID: 68889) Report Abuse | |
|
dark_wing wrote:
So, at the begining of the next season we will play with new not-tested engine... I'll take this as an personal offense, Dark_wing. We tested in many hundreds of games, and the last week with several testgroups, different tactics. It is absolutely out of focus to claim "not-tested". Thanks for your attention! |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
dark_wing
|
posted: 2012-11-18 17:30:26 (ID: 68891) Report Abuse |
|
was once I had read...
 |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
oddball
|
posted: 2012-11-18 18:48:53 (ID: 68914) Report Abuse |
|
JonnyP wrote:
Yes yes and yes again.... The match engine is looking much better than the previous one.. in terms of big plays, all Pete needs to do now is somehow find a way of allowing the defense to make tackles 15-50 yards downfield so that every breakaway does not result in a TD. BUT.... for 4-5 seasons, safeties and corners, and to a slightly lesser extent linebackers, have been neglected positions in RZA. How many of us prioritised DL to try to stuff the previously dominant running game? How many teams put their best allround defensive players at MLB/OLB/DE instead of SS? I've been playing teams who are trying to field a dime all day against 4WR but who only have 3-4 CBs on their roster, equally how do you expect a defense to play 30-40 snaps in 3-3-5 when you only have a couple of capable safeties? I have a receiver for example with 48+ speed/41+ strength/30+ agility/ 30+catching/ 30+ positioning/20+ carrying? How many teams have a CB capable of single coverage on a guy like that? He would need to be double teamed. So what options are there? Missed tackles delay the receiver more? Maybe the tackle is only partially 'missed', the CB has hold of the wideout, but struggles to bring him down, then a FS comes steaming in? Maybe intelligent DBs team tackle a receiver - one stands him up, the other takes his legs? Or maybe they start to knock the receiver out of bounds rather than actually bring him down? Then of course there are the much needed adjustments to blitzing. These are all options. i neglegtected my DL for DBs. some of it out of neglecting the game and losing them but overall my DB's are better than most of my DL and LB's. i see a lot of teams playing SG4 only and Dime does any team have WR's and DBs as good as the mains to cover! doubt it. int returns still seem false on the gained yardage front. too large most of the time considering its in their backfield. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
spuddy1972
|
posted: 2012-11-18 20:29:06 (ID: 68921) Report Abuse |
|
TombKing wrote:
I can't complain. I'm quite satisfied with how things are going so far Lets see if we can put a dent in your impressive run  Last edited on 2012-11-18 20:30:05 by spuddy1972 |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
bwadders76
|
posted: 2012-11-18 20:47:25 (ID: 68923) Report Abuse |
|
spuddy1972 wrote:
TombKing wrote:
I can't complain. I'm quite satisfied with how things are going so far Lets see if we can put a dent in your impressive run Ding Ding seconds out round one  |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
TombKing
|
posted: 2012-11-18 20:49:50 (ID: 68924) Report Abuse |
|
bwadders76 wrote:
spuddy1972 wrote:
TombKing wrote:
I can't complain. I'm quite satisfied with how things are going so far Lets see if we can put a dent in your impressive run Ding Ding seconds out round one Bring it on  |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 3 4 6 > >| | |
| Main / Discussions / Match Engine | |
