no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Discussions / Out of position penalty too low? Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 4 5 6 > >| | |
| Poster | Message |
|
hosh13
|
posted: 2012-12-11 14:34:30 (ID: 71853) Report Abuse |
|
Nogard wrote:
So if you play much 3-3-5 and dime you don´t need so much DL or LB and have spots free for your 335/dime. What´s the problem? Oh, OK - I'll just abandon short yardage then.  |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
sh8888
|
posted: 2012-12-11 14:36:34 (ID: 71854) Report Abuse |
|
hosh13 wrote:
Nogard wrote:
So if you play much 3-3-5 and dime you don´t need so much DL or LB and have spots free for your 335/dime. What´s the problem? Oh, OK - I'll just abandon short yardage then. probably preferable if you abandoned logical debate .... it doesn't seem to be your strong point  |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Viking
|
posted: 2012-12-11 14:38:37 (ID: 71855) Report Abuse |
|
ptossell wrote:
In the NFL you have a roster of 53, we have 70. There is NO issue here hosh Just one note, NFL teams do not have trainees, which are not good enough to play game, on roster as we need to have ... |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
hosh13
|
posted: 2012-12-11 14:44:03 (ID: 71856) Report Abuse |
|
ptossell wrote:
In the NFL you have a roster of 53, we have 70. There is NO issue here hosh That is a decent point - but there is an issue. Why be unnecessarily unrealistic? As already pointed out, there is great interchangeability between CB/SF. CBs - faster, better Pos/Ag SFs - smarter, better Vis/Str/Tack The OOPP takes care of itself imo. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
ptossell
|
posted: 2012-12-11 14:45:18 (ID: 71857) Report Abuse |
|
Viking wrote:
ptossell wrote:
In the NFL you have a roster of 53, we have 70. There is NO issue here hosh Just one note, NFL teams do not have trainees, which are not good enough to play game, on roster as we need to have ... True, but this game is all about choices. The more development players you chose to have on your roster, the less you will have available for flexibility on your 55 man roster. Ultimately, a 55 player depth chart should be plenty to allow for sufficient players in all positions - it does for me |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
ptossell
|
posted: 2012-12-11 14:46:40 (ID: 71858) Report Abuse |
|
hosh13 wrote:
ptossell wrote:
In the NFL you have a roster of 53, we have 70. There is NO issue here hosh That is a decent point - but there is an issue. Why be unnecessarily unrealistic? As already pointed out, there is great interchangeability between CB/SF. CBs - faster, better Pos/Ag SFs - smarter, better Vis/Str/Tack The OOPP takes care of itself imo. But this still doesn't address the AC issue, which will be he bigger challenge. How would you propose we change the ACs? |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Viking
|
posted: 2012-12-11 14:47:01 (ID: 71859) Report Abuse |
|
ptossell wrote:
Ultimately, a 55 player depth chart should be plenty to allow for sufficient players in all positions - it does for me I completely agree with this one  |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Nogard
|
posted: 2012-12-11 14:48:05 (ID: 71860) Report Abuse |
|
hosh13 wrote:
Nogard wrote:
So if you play much 3-3-5 and dime you don´t need so much DL or LB and have spots free for your 335/dime. What´s the problem? Oh, OK - I'll just abandon short yardage then. Would you discuss or making fun? Then the discussion is over. You wrote you will play 335 and dime and need 11 DBs. You never wrote something about other formations or how often you use these formations. So what? if you only use these two you have enough free spots to cover these 11 DBs. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
hosh13
|
posted: 2012-12-11 14:49:57 (ID: 71861) Report Abuse |
|
This all reminds me of pete pointing out that if you run out of CBs in a game, but you have spare SFs in the 55 then the SFs sub for them (and vice-verse).
What I don't know is whether the OOPP applies in that case? |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
hosh13
|
posted: 2012-12-11 14:53:48 (ID: 71862) Report Abuse |
|
ptossell wrote:
But this still doesn't address the AC issue, which will be he bigger challenge. How would you propose we change the ACs? Issue? Ummm, scrap CB and SF ACs and have a DB AC!  |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 4 5 6 > >| | |
| Main / Discussions / Out of position penalty too low? | |
