no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Discussions / Chosen Stadium as Bowl game Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 >| | |
| Poster | Message |
| posted: 2013-01-16 19:38:35 (ID: 76904) Report Abuse | |
|
Lamumia wrote:
bwadders76 wrote:
Then it would be cheaper to have it on auto pilot than it would to have to do it manually. There is no financial saving to doing it yourself then. Not necessarily. His salary could be purely for automating the process, so you would still have to pay the regular fees for the actual renovation on top of his salary. Ah, now I get bwadders idea...I meant it like Lamumia wrote it down |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
bwadders76
|
posted: 2013-01-16 20:16:35 (ID: 76910) Report Abuse |
|
pete wrote:
Lamumia wrote:
bwadders76 wrote:
Then it would be cheaper to have it on auto pilot than it would to have to do it manually. There is no financial saving to doing it yourself then. Not necessarily. His salary could be purely for automating the process, so you would still have to pay the regular fees for the actual renovation on top of his salary. Ah, now I get bwadders idea...I meant it like Lamumia wrote it down Then it would get a  from me. The only question I would have is would this member of staff upgrade the stadium for every home game or could you give him settings like:-
Every Game Every two game Before every league game etc The reason I ask is that when working out the costs v the benefits I decided to wax my stadium before every league game as the income gained is greater. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2013-01-16 20:20:06 (ID: 76912) Report Abuse | |
|
I would just allow "Facility Manager" level 1 or 20. If 20, then the stadium gets maintained after each game it lost bit of its condition. If a manager would like to run a more sophisticated setup like "every 2 games", and save money, he sets the facility manager to level 1 again, and thats it
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
sh8888
|
posted: 2013-01-16 20:48:23 (ID: 76921) Report Abuse |
|
pete wrote:
I would just allow "Facility Manager" level 1 or 20. If 20, then the stadium gets maintained after each game it lost bit of its condition. If a manager would like to run a more sophisticated setup like "every 2 games", and save money, he sets the facility manager to level 1 again, and thats it I think the Wax Tax was an awful idea..... and now the 'Facility Manager' is another awful idea stacked on top of an awful idea .... truly disastrous thinking. 
The stated aim of the 'Stadium Condition Repair' *cough* Wax Tax *cough* was to take some money out of the game. You should have done it in a far more Targeted manner..... as it was the Transfer Market that you considered to be 'overheating', you should've targeted the Transfer Market ........ a Sliding Scale of Transfer Tax (instead of the 5% Flat Rate Tax) would've taken far more money out of the game and would've left no possibility of 'loopholes' (i.e. 99,999 Stadium - no Tax ......100,000 Stadium - pays full tax). Most Governments that introduce a stupid Tax eventually get rid of it (usually quietly after a few years), you should do the same with this daft tax. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2013-01-16 20:54:29 (ID: 76927) Report Abuse | |
|
So finally, I am a government now, because I added a stupid tax too.
Damn! However, for me the stadium condition works as expected. And it takes out money of the game, which was intented |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Buffalo
|
posted: 2013-01-16 21:07:40 (ID: 76934) Report Abuse |
|
pete wrote:
I would just allow "Facility Manager" level 1 or 20. If 20, then the stadium gets maintained after each game it lost bit of its condition. If a manager would like to run a more sophisticated setup like "every 2 games", and save money, he sets the facility manager to level 1 again, and thats it I like to run it allways manually. So will be there a "Facility manager" level 0? |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
hosh13
|
posted: 2013-01-17 05:02:40 (ID: 76965) Report Abuse |
|
How about for playoffs in particular (and maybe league games as well), that there is a fine for hosting a home game with a stadium condition below x?
I wonder if the NFL fine teams for similar atrocities? |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
badkarma
|
posted: 2013-01-17 06:46:59 (ID: 76969) Report Abuse |
|
sh8888 wrote:
I think the Wax Tax was an awful idea..... and now the 'Facility Manager' is another awful idea stacked on top of an awful idea .... truly disastrous thinking.
The stated aim of the 'Stadium Condition Repair' *cough* Wax Tax *cough* was to take some money out of the game. You should have done it in a far more Targeted manner..... as it was the Transfer Market that you considered to be 'overheating', you should've targeted the Transfer Market ........ a Sliding Scale of Transfer Tax (instead of the 5% Flat Rate Tax) would've taken far more money out of the game and would've left no possibility of 'loopholes' (i.e. 99,999 Stadium - no Tax ......100,000 Stadium - pays full tax). Agree completely. It did nothing to lessen the divide between players who'd been here 6 seasons and those who'd been here 1 as they also fell into the "tax" criteria if they'd built well. If anything, the rich teams absorbed the cost with little worry and the "just hit 100k" teams really feel the pinch of it. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 >| | |
| Main / Discussions / Chosen Stadium as Bowl game | |
