no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Discussions / Draft results Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 3 4 6 > >| | |
| Poster | Message |
|
notsch
|
posted: 2013-01-24 17:25:58 (ID: 78410) Report Abuse |
|
Actually, there were 2 great TEs in the thunder 1.1 draft board and i also thought about switching them to the WR position...at least temporarily, the waste blocking is really a shame...but well...guess who didn´t get them
I got my #2, #17 and #49 and i am happy that i got this time a decent QB with the last draft spot at 96...so the bots did a great job draftig the crap 
 Last edited on 2013-01-24 17:26:56 by notsch |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
vaarg
|
posted: 2013-01-24 18:31:05 (ID: 78423) Report Abuse |
|
I had the Pass Blocker TE as my number 3 pick.
I went QB at 1st and 2nd and got them both. Both have 50Int, with one of them a natural leader. Quite happy with them. Also a starting OL with my 3rd pick (which was 26th on my list). Anyway. those players will be learning their trade in 2.1 this season. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Beergut2
|
posted: 2013-01-24 19:10:58 (ID: 78442) Report Abuse |
|
andrew2scott2 wrote:
Beergut2 wrote:
Something isn't right with the draft rankings. I set my draft board weeks ago and checked it a few times. I was going for DL since that is my weakest position and had roughly my first 10 players choices all as DL. Yet my first round pick (9th overall) was an OL and there was only one DL drafted before him. My second and third round picks were both DLs so that helps but i missed out on the best DLs. I just don't get it.  it likely that you by mistake put a OL rank in with the DL as they look alike No I didn't do that. I had checked my rankings a few times over the past few weeks and the OL I got with my first pick was definitely lower on my list than second. There were at least 2 DLs that were 3 stars in the draft so they were my top two ranked players without a doubt. I double checked now and there was only ONE DL taken before my turn so somehow my rankings didn't work out. The OL I got is pretty good but was definitely not what I was going for with a top 10 pick. Just wish I knew what happened there... |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2013-01-25 00:12:10 (ID: 78493) Report Abuse | |
|
I got my 1st, 3rd, and 7th players on my draft board, 2 LBs and a G. All of them have great skills (as draftees should), but they're a bit slow for their positions on my team.
 I had to move my top pick up front, but the (now former) LB should fit nicely on my D-line. I'll have to wait for the other LB and G to develop a bit more before I decide what I'm going to do with them.  |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Beergut2
|
posted: 2013-01-25 06:38:41 (ID: 78508) Report Abuse |
|
Beergut2 wrote:
andrew2scott2 wrote:
Beergut2 wrote:
Something isn't right with the draft rankings. I set my draft board weeks ago and checked it a few times. I was going for DL since that is my weakest position and had roughly my first 10 players choices all as DL. Yet my first round pick (9th overall) was an OL and there was only one DL drafted before him. My second and third round picks were both DLs so that helps but i missed out on the best DLs. I just don't get it. it likely that you by mistake put a OL rank in with the DL as they look alike No I didn't do that. I had checked my rankings a few times over the past few weeks and the OL I got with my first pick was definitely lower on my list than second. There were at least 2 DLs that were 3 stars in the draft so they were my top two ranked players without a doubt. I double checked now and there was only ONE DL taken before my turn so somehow my rankings didn't work out. The OL I got is pretty good but was definitely not what I was going for with a top 10 pick. Just wish I knew what happened there... After checking the manual about the draft I probably screwed up my dedicated rounds from the way it looks. At one point I think I listed that OL as a round 1 choice but had him further down the list. Once I got my list organized how I wanted it, I probably forgot to remove that dedicated listing. Its the only possibility... ugh, how stupid. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
alexshans84
|
posted: 2013-01-25 06:43:42 (ID: 78509) Report Abuse |
|
Beergut2 wrote:
After checking the manual about the draft I probably screwed up my dedicated rounds from the way it looks. At one point I think I listed that OL as a round 1 choice but had him further down the list. Once I got my list organized how I wanted it, I probably forgot to remove that dedicated listing. Its the only possibility... ugh, how stupid. Friendly advice: never touch these f*ing dedicated rounds |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
holmeboy
|
posted: 2013-01-25 09:15:06 (ID: 78524) Report Abuse |
|
Has anybody drafted any unwanted punters? Only seeing one on the TM...
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2013-01-25 10:20:12 (ID: 78538) Report Abuse | |
|
holmeboy wrote:
Has anybody drafted any unwanted punters? Only seeing one on the TM... Looking since yesterday for them, a Kicker would be welcome too |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
holmeboy
|
posted: 2013-01-25 11:29:07 (ID: 78542) Report Abuse |
|
pete wrote:
holmeboy wrote:
Has anybody drafted any unwanted punters? Only seeing one on the TM... Looking since yesterday for them, a Kicker would be welcome too Only 1 kicker too... Shouldve just splashed out on Fappers' vet P... |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Civilis
|
posted: 2013-01-25 11:34:28 (ID: 78543) Report Abuse |
|
Or his pet veteran
 |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 3 4 6 > >| | |
| Main / Discussions / Draft results | |
