no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Discussions / The BUG or not? - NO BUG Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 4 5 > >| | |
| Poster | Message |
| posted: 2013-02-01 15:37:29 (ID: 80137) Report Abuse | |
|
dark_wing wrote:
pete wrote:
preachie wrote:
the avg is built based on # of players behind each part - confusion wiped away? I think the confusion comes from the fact that Team A has a better rating than Team B in each area (except one where both are equal) but in overall rating Team B has a better rating. Have to say it confuses me too   No. If team A stronger in 4 parts. And teams are equal in 1 parts. The team A must be the stronger in overal. (from mathematiŃal point of view). I do not speak about (pass + passd + rush + rushd + specialteam)/5 Sorry, but this is....bullshit. If I built an average over ALL involved players the single grouped ratings dont matter! |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
dark_wing
|
posted: 2013-02-01 20:25:22 (ID: 80198) Report Abuse |
|
pete wrote:
dark_wing wrote:
pete wrote:
preachie wrote:
the avg is built based on # of players behind each part - confusion wiped away? I think the confusion comes from the fact that Team A has a better rating than Team B in each area (except one where both are equal) but in overall rating Team B has a better rating. Have to say it confuses me too No. If team A stronger in 4 parts. And teams are equal in 1 parts. The team A must be the stronger in overal. (from mathematiŃal point of view). I do not speak about (pass + passd + rush + rushd + specialteam)/5 Sorry, but this is....bullshit. If I built an average over ALL involved players the single grouped ratings dont matter! Sorry, but this is....bullshit. Then you calculate rating of the 1-st group you use players of this group. Then you calculate rating of the 2-nd group you use players of this group. Then you calculate rating of the 3-rd group you use players of this group. Then you calculate rating of the 4-th group you use players of this group. Then you calculate rating of the 5-th group you use players of this group. Then you calculate overal rating you use players of the all 5 groups. Do you have any education in mathematix and programming??? |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2013-02-01 21:10:11 (ID: 80202) Report Abuse | |
|
watch your tongue and dont attack me in such an offensive way. thank you for your attention.
find the mistake in your math proposal by yourself |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
dark_wing
|
posted: 2013-02-01 21:49:33 (ID: 80205) Report Abuse |
|
pete wrote:
find the mistake in your math proposal by yourself I can do it. But I need the blueprint for this. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2013-02-01 22:20:20 (ID: 80210) Report Abuse | |
|
like this
Gr.A (100+100)/2=100 > Gr.B (95+95+95+95+95)/5=95 Gr.A (10+10+10+10+10)/5=10 > Gr.B (10+9)/2=9,5 but overall Group A (100+100+10+10+10+10+10)/7=35,7 < Group B (95+95+95+95+95+10+9)/7=70,5 Edit: bolded Last edited on 2013-02-01 22:25:05 by Sanco |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2013-02-01 23:49:02 (ID: 80217) Report Abuse | |
|
Sanco wrote:
like this Gr.A (100+100)/2=100 > Gr.B (95+95+95+95+95)/5=95 Gr.A (10+10+10+10+10)/5=10 > Gr.B (10+9)/2=9,5 but overall Group A (100+100+10+10+10+10+10)/7=35,7 < Group B (95+95+95+95+95+10+9)/7=70,5 Edit: bolded  |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
hosh13
|
posted: 2013-02-02 02:34:12 (ID: 80226) Report Abuse |
|
It would seem the rating system is a little flawed in this case.
As it stands, 4 very good LBs on 1 squad are rated the same as 6 on another - clearly 6 are better than 4. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
dark_wing
|
posted: 2013-02-02 10:11:02 (ID: 80240) Report Abuse |
|
Sanco wrote:
like this Gr.A (100+100)/2=100 > Gr.B (95+95+95+95+95)/5=95 Gr.A (10+10+10+10+10)/5=10 > Gr.B (10+9)/2=9,5 but overall Group A (100+100+10+10+10+10+10)/7=35,7 < Group B (95+95+95+95+95+10+9)/7=70,5 Edit: bolded This example is not correct. Because we are not have the so large difference between players' rating. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2013-02-02 10:15:55 (ID: 80241) Report Abuse | |
Darkwing, you ask the owner and creator of this game if he can program? How can that NOT be offending and rude? 
That simple example did it, I think, to explain the basics. It CAN happen. Another question is, if it is right or wrong in your mind, but since this is Peters game .... @all: I really don't get why everyone is so horny over those ratings. They just help to compare in a raw kind of way. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
dark_wing
|
posted: 2013-02-02 10:39:45 (ID: 80246) Report Abuse |
|
jack6 wrote:
Darkwing, you ask the owner and creator of this game if he can program? How can that NOT be offending and rude?
That simple example did it, I think, to explain the basics. It CAN happen. Another question is, if it is right or wrong in your mind, but since this is Peters game .... @all: I really don't get why everyone is so horny over those ratings. They just help to compare in a raw kind of way. WOW.
We have players with rating 3 and 30?
With example where in group A numbers are aprox millions You'll have more interresting results. And example gives information about big problem in overal rating calculation on the blueprint stage. You a right raiting system here is incorrect. But manugers do not have another numbers for team developmant. And this is the problem. 
Last edited on 2013-02-02 10:49:53 by dark_wing |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 4 5 > >| | |
| Main / Discussions / The BUG or not? - NO BUG | |
