no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Discussions / What is wrong with punters. Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 3 4 5 >| | |
| Poster | Message |
|
Lamumia
|
posted: 2013-03-27 18:36:54 (ID: 88529) Report Abuse |
|
pete wrote:
Ask the owner about his calculations  I'm curious |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
sh8888
|
posted: 2013-03-27 18:37:14 (ID: 88530) Report Abuse |
|
Lamumia wrote:
pete wrote:
Lamumia wrote:
sh8888 wrote:
Lamumia wrote:
sh8888 wrote:
48 is approx $355k 49 is approx $422k 438,546 according to a scout report, seems like a waste of money yeah, $355k is skills-based wage .... $438,546 is because he's on a Franchise contract. Agree with you about the waste of money though .... you could pay a whole team (and a pretty good team too) for that sort of money. I'm paying 300k for my entire team. Even if I would consider paying that kind of money on a player, it wouldn't be a kicker. Don't think he will have enough impact for the money Warlord99 wrote:
the franchise contract was why i picked him up; plus if i can stay in the top div after the releg game; his salary wont hurt me too much Am I misunderstanding something here? you are paying extra to have him on a franchise contract? Isn't the idea with franchise contracts to save money? You save long term, but have ti spend short term. Yeah I get that. But he is maxed in skill now at 48.5, but at the same time his salary is 16k higher than the skill based salary for skill level 49. How can that save money in the long run? I think Pete should have said ... You save long term under the right circumstances IMO, these aren't the right circumstances |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2013-03-27 18:46:17 (ID: 88531) Report Abuse | |
|
sh8888 wrote:
I think Pete should have said ... You save long term under the right circumstances IMO, these aren't the right circumstances  |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Ranagol
|
posted: 2013-03-27 20:03:36 (ID: 88555) Report Abuse |
|
Long term i.e. by the time the special teams plays get a revamp you could train your own kicker and save the millions in wages you spend on this one player alone.
Short term i.e. with the current kicking "engine" I doubt this kicker has a bigger impact than my 35 skilled kicker with a reasonable wage. He will miss FGs from any random distance between 18-62 yards, the same way any other kicker does currently. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2013-03-27 20:04:56 (ID: 88557) Report Abuse | |
|
Ranagol wrote:
He will miss FGs from any random distance between 18-62 yards, the same way any other kicker does currently. That, dear Ranagol, is wrong. The chances raise for the kicker to make the goal... |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
sh8888
|
posted: 2013-03-27 20:10:03 (ID: 88558) Report Abuse |
|
Hmmmmm, I scouted Pete's Kicker/Punter .... he's a great Kicker but a shite Punter. Am I missing a trick here ?
 |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Ranagol
|
posted: 2013-03-27 20:10:19 (ID: 88559) Report Abuse |
|
pete wrote:
Ranagol wrote:
He will miss FGs from any random distance between 18-62 yards, the same way any other kicker does currently. That, dear Ranagol, is wrong. The chances raise for the kicker to make the goal... Not nearly enough it seems.... |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2013-03-27 20:11:27 (ID: 88560) Report Abuse | |
|
sh8888 wrote:
Hmmmmm, I scouted Pete's Kicker/Punter .... he's a great Kicker but a shite Punter. Am I missing a trick here ? You do! My roster is probably the worst maintained in the whole game. It makes absolutely no sense to compare players against my roster, promised! |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
sh8888
|
posted: 2013-03-27 20:16:33 (ID: 88561) Report Abuse |
|
pete wrote:
sh8888 wrote:
Hmmmmm, I scouted Pete's Kicker/Punter .... he's a great Kicker but a shite Punter. Am I missing a trick here ? You do! My roster is probably the worst maintained in the whole game. It makes absolutely no sense to compare players against my roster, promised! If you want a good Kicker/Punter, ask Panoramix ... he's Drafted at Pick #96 for the past 4 seasons, he always gets a Kicker or Punter every season |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
panoramix
|
posted: 2013-03-27 21:18:09 (ID: 88570) Report Abuse |
|
sh8888 wrote:If you want a good Kicker/Punter, ask Panoramix ... he's Drafted at Pick #96 for the past 4 seasons, he always gets a Kicker or Punter every season
 |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 3 4 5 >| | |
| Main / Discussions / What is wrong with punters. | |
