no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Discussions / The big EXP question Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 3 5 6 7 > >| | |
| Poster | Message |
|
hosh13
|
posted: 2013-04-22 16:20:56 (ID: 92811) Report Abuse |
|
Nogard wrote:
thats how I think about it too, pete. it is important not dominant. physicals for example are completely not influenced by exp. No, and I think the direct counterpart there is PC. You will notice that every good team has that > 95 ! 
So in comparison to EXP ~ 4.5 - 5* The other interesting point here is that it is a no brainer to train physicals on a player with low EXP since you will get the full (undiluted) benefit of doing so since his PC will be ~ 100. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Nogard
|
posted: 2013-04-22 16:32:56 (ID: 92816) Report Abuse |
|
PC influences all skills not only the physicals. And you cant compare PC with expierience. Exp is sth you can´t train. it is a process by geting older be in several situations and so on.
you compare apples with pears. Last edited on 2013-04-22 16:34:14 by Nogard |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2013-04-22 16:35:33 (ID: 92817) Report Abuse | |
 |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2013-04-22 16:35:37 (ID: 92818) Report Abuse | |
|
I have no problem with a model whereby a player keeps gaining experience until retirement (never hits max experience/5 stars). I just think the problem is the benefit/penalty shouldn’t be linear. The amount of player growth between year 1 and year 2 is larger compared to the growth between year 9 and year 10. Frankly, but year 10...I think the benefits of additional experience would be pretty small.
Surely the knowledge/experience that Brett Favre gained as a rookie was more beneficial that after 10 seasons in the league. Steve SD Blitz Last edited on 2013-04-22 16:37:08 by Solana_Steve |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2013-04-22 16:38:33 (ID: 92819) Report Abuse | |
|
But somehow we cover this already, since EXP0 means EXP 75, where EXP "full" means EXP 100...therefore we have no "zero experienced" players
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Meitheisman
|
posted: 2013-04-22 17:59:26 (ID: 92845) Report Abuse |
|
pete wrote:
But somehow we cover this already, since EXP0 means EXP 75, where EXP "full" means EXP 100...therefore we have no "zero experienced" players He said "I just think the problem is the benefit/penalty shouldn’t be linear." Unless I'm missing something whether it starts at 0 or 75 it's still linear, isn't it? What he means is that it should be easier to go from 1* EXP to 2* EXP than it should be to go from 4* EXP to 5* EXP. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2013-04-22 18:12:00 (ID: 92849) Report Abuse | |
|
It is indeed linear, but you dont start with 0. That is the difference
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Meitheisman
|
posted: 2013-04-22 19:35:55 (ID: 92872) Report Abuse |
|
pete wrote:
It is indeed linear, but you dont start with 0. That is the difference But don't you think that by playing one more game a rookie gains more experience than a veteran in his 10th season? I'm not sure what the difficulties of coding something like this would be but I think it'd make sense to have EXP increase slower in the higher levels. Something like this for examples: (numbers are completely random) - To go from 0* EXP to 1* EXP a player needs 2,000 snaps - To go from 1* to 2* a player needs 2,400 snaps - To go from 2* to 3* a player needs 3,000 snaps - To go from 3* to 4* a player needs 3,800 snaps - To go from 4* to 5* a player needs 5,000 snaps |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2013-04-22 21:35:03 (ID: 92896) Report Abuse | |
|
Sorry...I didn't mean to imply that I thought there were serious issues with the experience portion of the game. I was approaching it from a theory of modeling/simulating some thing from real life.
Steve SD Blitz |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
hosh13
|
posted: 2013-04-23 01:39:45 (ID: 92920) Report Abuse |
|
Nogard wrote:
PC influences all skills not only the physicals. Is this right pete? Why would "Physical" Conditioning effect skills? |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 3 5 6 7 > >| | |
| Main / Discussions / The big EXP question | |
