no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Dragons / Dragon Bowl : Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 >| | |
| Poster | Message |
|
sfniner08
|
posted: 2013-04-10 09:04:23 (ID: 90520) Report Abuse |
|
Besides I think the 4wrsg is going to somehow get nerfed at some point sooner than later.
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
MTS1972
|
posted: 2013-04-10 09:08:23 (ID: 90522) Report Abuse |
|
sfniner08 wrote:
We want realism for sure, but dude, we want to win. I see it as my job to make my team as successful as possible, which means to win. Which is fair enough - but doesnt doing that then moaning about it make it quite hypocritical? As said - i mean no disrespect - i just find it interesting seeing how other Leagues have panned out in comparison to ours, where we've just enjoyed one of the most open and exciting seasons to date - and had our 7th different Bowl winner in 7 seasons. But it did occur to me that if you choose a set of mundane singular plays 'to win' rather than use a more realistic playbook then thats more the fault of the Coach than it is of the game? |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
ScottWAR
|
posted: 2013-04-10 09:46:46 (ID: 90526) Report Abuse |
|
In reality coaches call the plays they think will win. This usually means mixing it up, so the other team isn't able to adjust to what you are doing.
If the game dictates that you use the same formations/plays all the time to have the best chance to win,...then it is not realistic,......and if realism is the goal, changes to the engine should be made so that being able to win means being realistic as far as play calling is concerned. You cant expect the players to use realistic play calling if that doesn't give them the best chance to win. So yes, if you are more likely to win with a singular set of plays than a more realistic playbook,...it is the fault of the game....if realism is the goal. Last edited on 2013-04-10 09:50:03 by ScottWAR |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
MTS1972
|
posted: 2013-04-10 10:14:02 (ID: 90528) Report Abuse |
|
So youre saying these teams cant win unless they play a bastardized set of play calls?
Funny...other teams seem to manage just fine.... |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
panoramix
|
posted: 2013-04-10 13:26:45 (ID: 90547) Report Abuse |
|
MTS1972 wrote:
So youre saying these teams cant win unless they play a bastardized set of play calls? Funny...other teams seem to manage just fine.... You're wrong: other teams (as my team, partially) don't like to play a monothematic PB, so set up a more various and realistic PB. This does not mean that his PBs are more effective. I think that with a only-4WR PB my win vs. SF would have been much larger and quite: a large number of tests says that a simple 4WR PB (*) is enough to win if you are at the same level of your opponent, because we have no efficient defensive formations to counter it. On this issue we are almost in the same conditions in wich we were at season two (or three?), with Big-I formation and run, run, run. (*) 1st down: prefer pass 2nd down: prefer run 3rd down: prefer pass |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
sfniner08
|
posted: 2013-04-10 13:33:33 (ID: 90554) Report Abuse |
|
MTS1972 wrote:
So youre saying these teams cant win unless they play a bastardized set of play calls? Funny...other teams seem to manage just fine.... Of course we can win and succeed with other playbooks. It is just the 4wrsg is the MOST effective right now. It only makes sense to go with the most effective strategy. I've only used this playbook for less than half a season actually. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Quimriera
|
posted: 2013-04-10 15:00:32 (ID: 90570) Report Abuse |
|
Congratulations again, Panoramix...!!
Being so many seasons at the top has much merit. 
Un abbraccio da Girona! 
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
panoramix
|
posted: 2013-04-10 15:35:57 (ID: 90579) Report Abuse |
|
Quimriera wrote:
Congratulations again, Panoramix...!! Being so many seasons at the top has much merit.
Un abbraccio da Girona!
Thank you, Quim!
I'm waiting for you at the next Bowl. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
sfniner08
|
posted: 2013-04-15 08:44:56 (ID: 91203) Report Abuse |
|
Plan B enacted. Single Big, and Single spread. lol
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
panoramix
|
posted: 2013-04-15 18:36:06 (ID: 91300) Report Abuse |
|
Single back spread is enough: now, with a very good RB, you have not even the problem of the "out of position" malus.
Great work, Pete!
 |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 >| | |
| Main / Dragons / Dragon Bowl : | |
