no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Discussions / Depth Chart, Full 55 or not and number of players per POS? Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< 2 3 > >| | |
| Poster | Message |
|
Meitheisman
|
posted: 2013-05-20 02:53:13 (ID: 96253) Report Abuse |
|
I have 2 questions regarding people’s Depth Chart.
1) Do you fill your DC with 55 players or less? If less, how many? 2) How many players do you have at each position? I personally do fill my roster with 55 players, the exact number of players at each position changes a little bit depending on injuries and match-ups but my base DC looks like this. QB 2 WR 5 RB 4 FB 3 TE 3 OL 9 Total Offense 26 players DL 10 LB 7 CB 5 SF 5 Total Defense 27 players K 1 P 1 Total 55 players For Gunners I usually play 2/3 fast back-up DBs/LBs and for KR I usually play 2/3 back-up WRs/RBs. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
andrew2scott2
|
posted: 2013-05-20 03:02:42 (ID: 96254) Report Abuse |
|
Well it depends on your style mostly but have 55 in DC is a must if not PC will pick people to fill it for you
As for me i run 4wr set all day QB 3 WR 8 RB 3 FB 1 with two RB behide him if he should get injured TE 0 OL 10 Total Offense 25 players DL 10 LB 8 CB 5 SF 5 Total Defense 28 players K 1 P 1 Total 55 players I list my KR and G form LB ,CB ,SF,RB,WR Last edited on 2013-05-20 03:03:39 by andrew2scott2 |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
hosh13
|
posted: 2013-05-20 03:11:22 (ID: 96255) Report Abuse |
|
Always 55
Fill main positions with the players I want in the rotations O reserves after first 2 players in KR D reserves after first 2 players in G |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Grzymisław
|
posted: 2013-05-20 12:21:13 (ID: 96296) Report Abuse |
|
I always have 55 players. It depends on their quality - for newer teams I advise to have less players and cut from depth chart some whose skills are lowest and their apperance can have negative impact on result.
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
MTS1972
|
posted: 2013-05-20 15:30:24 (ID: 96310) Report Abuse |
|
andrew2scott2 wrote:
TE 0 Yep i know players can do what they want and its all about personal preference and 'finding an edge' - but the above, to me, is just wrong and makes a mockery of the game. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
C17Ajax
|
posted: 2013-05-20 15:42:45 (ID: 96311) Report Abuse |
|
MTS1972 wrote:
andrew2scott2 wrote:
TE 0 Yep i know players can do what they want and its all about personal preference and 'finding an edge' - but the above, to me, is just wrong and makes a mockery of the game. Is that a mockery if the player would never see playtime in the PB? NFL teams do all sorts of crazy roster stuff... "out of position"? (is Dexter McCluster an RB or WR?) or when the 2 TE sets started in the NFL? I would be disappointed if he did have a dedicated player in the TE slot that never saw playtime- - that's idiocy. Although better deception on his part might be to dual-position his last 2 WRs in the TE slots for the DC  |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
MTS1972
|
posted: 2013-05-20 17:33:10 (ID: 96325) Report Abuse |
|
I can understand players using individual players to play multi positions - thats fairly standard.
but to have NO player in the DC at all because you simply know you are never going to use them or any formation that requires that position (and i believe that the SG4WR is about the only one) to me makes a mockery of a game doing its damndest to be as good a simulation to RL as possible - given that its an online sim. To me it would be like someone finding that going 6-3-2 in soccer, but not having an goalkeeper, works great and you just keep churning it out. No team doesnt have a TE - no team runs/passes out of the same formation play in/play out. I respect the right for players to do as they choose - but they get zero respect for doing it. I doubt they care - but im allowed my opinion as much as anyone. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
bwadders76
|
posted: 2013-05-20 17:37:28 (ID: 96327) Report Abuse |
|
MTS1972 wrote:
I can understand players using individual players to play multi positions - thats fairly standard. but to have NO player in the DC at all because you simply know you are never going to use them or any formation that requires that position (and i believe that the SG4WR is about the only one) to me makes a mockery of a game doing its damndest to be as good a simulation to RL as possible - given that its an online sim. To me it would be like someone finding that going 6-3-2 in soccer, but not having an goalkeeper, works great and you just keep churning it out. No team doesnt have a TE - no team runs/passes out of the same formation play in/play out. I respect the right for players to do as they choose - but they get zero respect for doing it. I doubt they care - but im allowed my opinion as much as anyone. Singleback Spread also now. Careful what you say you'll have the Admirals version of the village idiot piping up from his hamsters cage |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
alexshans84
|
posted: 2013-05-20 17:43:34 (ID: 96328) Report Abuse |
|
MTS1972 wrote:
...but to have NO player in the DC at all because you simply know you are never going to use them or any formation that requires that position (and i believe that the SG4WR is about the only one) BTW there are 4 (out of 10 offensive formations) using no TEs: Gun Spread, Singleback Spread, Wishbone and Flexbone |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
MTS1972
|
posted: 2013-05-20 18:15:13 (ID: 96332) Report Abuse |
|
alexshans84 wrote:
MTS1972 wrote:
...but to have NO player in the DC at all because you simply know you are never going to use them or any formation that requires that position (and i believe that the SG4WR is about the only one) BTW there are 4 (out of 10 offensive formations) using no TEs: Gun Spread, Singleback Spread, Wishbone and Flexbone 1,4 or whatever - it still makes a mockery of the game. To not even have one on the DC just shows the guys line of thinking. Applied to all managers out there who do the same. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< 2 3 > >| | |
| Main / Discussions / Depth Chart, Full 55 or not and number of players per POS? | |
