no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Discussions / Depth Chart, Full 55 or not and number of players per POS? Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 3 > >| | |
| Poster | Message |
|
andrew2scott2
|
posted: 2013-05-20 19:22:24 (ID: 96347) Report Abuse |
|
Well I never call anything that has TE so why list it. I go 4wr all day both singal back and 4wr shotgun.
But on the rare time that the goal line come up the pc just tosses ol,wr,rb in there which works by me |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
C17Ajax
|
posted: 2013-05-20 19:26:44 (ID: 96348) Report Abuse |
|
andrew2scott2 wrote:
Well I never call anything that has TE so why list it. I go 4wr all day both singal back and 4wr shotgun. But on the rare time that the goal line come up the pc just tosses ol,wr,rb in there which works by me Yes, but you might as well pick the best OL/WR/RB (prob OL if you only run GL w/TE) for the job and throw them into the DC under TE. They don't count against your final 55 as long as they're already on the roster...then anyone scouting your team doesn't get to instantly see that the TE formations are off the table Of course, you may enjoy going  to those that  and  more
 Last edited on 2013-05-20 19:27:34 by C17Ajax |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
andrew2scott2
|
posted: 2013-05-20 19:41:47 (ID: 96354) Report Abuse |
|
acully i had problems with the depth chart by doing that that left 3 of my linemen in for 70plays one game that why i do what i do. And no no one was injured or any thing.
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
mikemike778
|
posted: 2013-05-20 22:30:37 (ID: 96378) Report Abuse |
|
bwadders76 wrote:
MTS1972 wrote:
I can understand players using individual players to play multi positions - thats fairly standard. but to have NO player in the DC at all because you simply know you are never going to use them or any formation that requires that position (and i believe that the SG4WR is about the only one) to me makes a mockery of a game doing its damndest to be as good a simulation to RL as possible - given that its an online sim. To me it would be like someone finding that going 6-3-2 in soccer, but not having an goalkeeper, works great and you just keep churning it out. No team doesnt have a TE - no team runs/passes out of the same formation play in/play out. I respect the right for players to do as they choose - but they get zero respect for doing it. I doubt they care - but im allowed my opinion as much as anyone. Singleback Spread also now. Careful what you say you'll have the Admirals version of the village idiot piping up from his hamsters cage Ah that's not very nice is it ? I thought we were friends. You still upset about spending all that time on your playbook and still losing to someone who didn't. Have a lollipop that will make you feel better. Anyways on topic ... they certainly have a point. Can you imagine the uproar in the NFL if a team went into a game without activating say a Full Back. It would be the end of the game as we know it. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Meitheisman
|
posted: 2013-05-21 01:00:50 (ID: 96391) Report Abuse |
|
mikemike778 wrote:Anyways on topic ... they certainly have a point. Can you imagine the uproar in the NFL if a team went into a game without activating say a Full Back. It would be the end of the game as we know it.
The 2008 Eagles (and many other teams) carried no FB on their rosters before, not sure why you think there would be any uproar, I was in Philadelphia at the time and I don't remember anyone batting an eyelid over the fact that the Eagles didn't keep a single FB on the roster. 2008 Eagles roster: http://www.footballdb.com/teams/nfl/philadelphia-eagles/roster/2008 |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
C17Ajax
|
posted: 2013-05-21 04:40:28 (ID: 96404) Report Abuse |
|
Meitheisman wrote:
mikemike778 wrote:Anyways on topic ... they certainly have a point. Can you imagine the uproar in the NFL if a team went into a game without activating say a Full Back. It would be the end of the game as we know it.
The 2008 Eagles (and many other teams) carried no FB on their rosters before, not sure why you think there would be any uproar, I was in Philadelphia at the time and I don't remember anyone batting an eyelid over the fact that the Eagles didn't keep a single FB on the roster. 2008 Eagles roster: http://www.footballdb.com/teams/nfl/philadelphia-eagles/roster/2008 I think mikemike778 meant to include a  Last edited on 2013-05-21 04:40:51 by C17Ajax |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Meitheisman
|
posted: 2013-05-21 06:02:32 (ID: 96406) Report Abuse |
|
Ha. Totally flew over my head the first time around but now it looks glaringly obvious. I'm an idiot
 |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
bwadders76
|
posted: 2013-05-21 06:21:08 (ID: 96411) Report Abuse |
|
Meitheisman wrote:
Ha. Totally flew over my head the first time around but now it looks glaringly obvious. I'm an idiot I don't want to cause a row so I'll agree with you just to be nice  |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
sfniner08
|
posted: 2013-05-22 01:40:51 (ID: 96513) Report Abuse |
|
QB=2
RB=2 FB=2 TE=3 WR=5 OL=9 DL=9 LB=6 CB=5 SF=4 K=1 P=1 G=2 KR=2 |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Meitheisman
|
posted: 2013-05-22 06:33:58 (ID: 96524) Report Abuse |
|
You have guys playing only G or KR on your team? Why don't you play someone from another position since there isn't any OOPP for G and KR?
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 3 > >| | |
| Main / Discussions / Depth Chart, Full 55 or not and number of players per POS? | |
