no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Discussions / Less free agents...prices rising? Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< 2 > >| | |
| Poster | Message |
| posted: 2013-06-02 15:48:10 (ID: 97773) Report Abuse | |
|
Are there less free agents now, compare to a few week ago?
Steve SD Blitz |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Firenze
|
posted: 2013-06-02 16:02:19 (ID: 97775) Report Abuse |
|
Solana_Steve wrote:
Are there less free agents now, compare to a few week ago? Steve SD Blitz There's definitely fewer of the quality free agents we're used to seeing. Therefore, any players that enter the market seem better by comparison. I sold a bunch of players yesterday and got good prices for most of them. It was about time player value increased, to be honest. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Lamumia
|
posted: 2013-06-02 16:37:54 (ID: 97778) Report Abuse |
|
Pete wrote it in a thread a couple of weeks ago, that he would lower the number of those free agents a little again. I can't find the thread to back it up though.
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
E Logic
|
posted: 2013-06-02 18:45:27 (ID: 97791) Report Abuse |
|
Lamumia wrote:
i think your right, i remember seeing pete writing something like that as wellPete wrote it in a thread a couple of weeks ago, that he would lower the number of those free agents a little again. I can't find the thread to back it up though. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2013-06-02 19:13:40 (ID: 97794) Report Abuse | |
|
E Logic wrote:
Lamumia wrote:
i think your right, i remember seeing pete writing something like that as wellPete wrote it in a thread a couple of weeks ago, that he would lower the number of those free agents a little again. I can't find the thread to back it up though. I think you are right if you think he is right in remembering reading me writing about changes on the number FAs... |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Meitheisman
|
posted: 2013-06-02 19:28:46 (ID: 97797) Report Abuse |
|
I must have missed that thread... Wouldn't reducing the number of FAs increase the time it'll take new teams to catch-up?
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2013-06-02 19:31:47 (ID: 97798) Report Abuse | |
|
No. I tracked the number of FAs that hit the transfer market, and those that were hired. I reduced the number then by a percentage of the amount of the non-hired. Yes, it might have an effect, but only a very very small one
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Meitheisman
|
posted: 2013-06-02 19:46:33 (ID: 97799) Report Abuse |
|
Fair enough, I trust your judgment.
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Lamumia
|
posted: 2013-06-02 19:58:21 (ID: 97800) Report Abuse |
|
I'm a little confused
Is it correct understood that you only lowered the percentage for the ones that most likely didn't get hired anyway? |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2013-06-02 20:08:27 (ID: 97802) Report Abuse | |
|
example numbers to make it clear
i put 100 FAs on the market, and 50 got hired...this makes 50 non-hired FAs. I reduced the number by 50% of the non.hired FA, which makes 75 then... Again: numbers are not real, just examples And yes, I did not change the average quality by just removing those not being hired...That would be too easy |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< 2 > >| | |
| Main / Discussions / Less free agents...prices rising? | |
