no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Rookie Area / Player ratings Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< 2 3 4 > >| | |
| Poster | Message |
|
kelvinkmq
|
posted: 2013-07-12 03:34:46 (ID: 101609) Report Abuse |
|
What topics are exactly used to give the rating to players? It's the average skill points better than X points then you get a Y* rating, for example?
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2013-07-12 06:28:51 (ID: 101641) Report Abuse | |
|
the positional rating represents the skills of a player, basically.
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Frankebasta
|
posted: 2013-07-15 07:06:28 (ID: 100000290) Report Abuse |
|
If I'm not mistaken, the experience is involved as well.
BTW, I feel it would be useful to have a better gauge of player's abilities by actually using ALL five rating stars. Right now, even the lousiest players have one star, and I couldn't find a 4-star one even on the best teams' rosters. Same way, it'd be nice to have all positions rated by the same standard. To me, it looks like CB stars are much cheaper than S, let alone DL. And FB position is even stingier. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Chareos
|
posted: 2013-07-15 08:11:23 (ID: 100000312) Report Abuse |
|
Frankebasta wrote:
If I'm not mistaken, the experience is involved as well. BTW, I feel it would be useful to have a better gauge of player's abilities by actually using ALL five rating stars. Right now, even the lousiest players have one star, and I couldn't find a 4-star one even on the best teams' rosters. Same way, it'd be nice to have all positions rated by the same standard. To me, it looks like CB stars are much cheaper than S, let alone DL. And FB position is even stingier. 4 Star |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
panoramix
|
posted: 2013-07-17 23:15:29 (ID: 100000698) Report Abuse |
|
Frankebasta wrote:I couldn't find a 4-star one even on the best teams' rosters.
Frank, butta un occhio dalle mie parti! 
"Frank, throw a look in my part!" Please stick with english in the global forums Last edited on 2013-07-18 07:08:04 by pete |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
sfniner08
|
posted: 2013-07-18 01:59:19 (ID: 100000703) Report Abuse |
|
I have 4 on defense and none a cb.
4 star dl I drafted in the first draft 4 star dl I bought 4 star lb I drafted 4 star lb my first overall draft pick ever. I have 5 player on offense at 3.5 stars. I have 9 more defensive players that are at 3.5 stars. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Frankebasta
|
posted: 2013-07-18 05:11:23 (ID: 100000705) Report Abuse |
|
That's my point exactly!
If two among the best teams in the game, have barely half a dozen 4* (actually, more like 4 of them each), there's a problem with this kind of rating. Five stars are impossible (?) to reach. Even 4-and-a-half.... doesn't exist. I would like to see the whole 5* spectrum used. It would make for a more precise reading, gauging players on the market, and when scouting. Not to mention, it would help new users to effectively set their rosters up. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2013-07-18 07:08:55 (ID: 100000714) Report Abuse | |
|
There is the whole spectrum available. At the test platforms such players exists
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Firenze
|
posted: 2013-07-18 11:06:49 (ID: 100000732) Report Abuse |
|
pete wrote:
There is the whole spectrum available. At the test platforms such players exists If I had to guess, a 5* player would need 48 - 50 skill points in each relevant non-physical, along with max experience. This only seems viable for QB / K / P. It also doesn't sound very.affordable  |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2013-07-18 11:29:44 (ID: 100000733) Report Abuse | |
|
Firenze wrote:
...and it is not the goal to provide each team with such playerspete wrote:
There is the whole spectrum available. At the test platforms such players exists If I had to guess, a 5* player would need 48 - 50 skill points in each relevant non-physical, along with max experience. This only seems viable for QB / K / P. It also doesn't sound very.affordable |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< 2 3 4 > >| | |
| Main / Rookie Area / Player ratings | |
