Login
no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Suggestions / Defensive Tactic Changes? Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< 2 > >| | |
| Rating: | |
| Poster | Message |
|
sfniner08
|
posted: 2011-09-17 16:26:20 (ID: 10609) Report Abuse |
|
There are 2 items but they are both related to def tactics so I'm putting them both on this thread.
1. Will we at some point down the line have a goal line defense? That would be helpful for when the offense has the ball on say the 5 yard line or less. 2. Will we at some point down the line have a blitzing feature? It could be you can designate one player to blitz in certain situations, a sell out blitz, or even a computer selected player blitzes and you just check off a box to blitz. For defensive strategy sake it would be helpful to blitz in say a 4 wr shotgun formation in a specific down. It would mean more opportunities for offense and defense. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Admin
Contact |
posted: 2011-09-17 16:53:26 (ID: 10616) |
|
Here we go
Formations: Whenever you feel to suggest a new formation, please put it like this into the forum: formation name: iformation formation type: offense lineup: otl|otr|ogl|ogr|oc|wrl|wrr|tel|qb|hbc|fbc I will ignore suggestions of really extreme formations, one sided formations. To keep it fair on the field. Blitzing: Already on the todo, and already in the engine and the playbook, but hidden for the moment. we had it some months ago, but I had to disable it due some odd things. It will come back, for sure. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Monkey
|
posted: 2011-09-17 18:52:48 (ID: 10658) Report Abuse |
|
Goaline
offence OT/L,OG/L,OC,OG/R,OT/R,TE/L,TE/R,TE/R,QB,HB/C,FB/C Goaline Defense DE/L,DT/L,NT,DT/R,DE/R,OLB/L,MLB,MLB,OLB/R,SS/L,SS/R Thats about right i think Last edited on 2011-09-17 18:54:10 by Monkey |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Buffalo
|
posted: 2011-09-17 21:17:47 (ID: 10693) Report Abuse |
|
Monkey wrote:
Goaline Defense DE/L,DT/L,NT,DT/R,DE/R,OLB/L,MLB,MLB,OLB/R,SS/L,SS/R Thats about right i think I thought the original is DE/L,DT/L,NT,DT/R,DE/R,OLB/L,MLB,MLB,OLB/R,CB/L,CB/R |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Admin
Contact |
posted: 2011-09-17 21:30:34 (ID: 10699) |
|
Monkey wrote:
Goaline offence OT/L,OG/L,OC,OG/R,OT/R, OK Monkey wrote:
TE/L,TE/R,TE/R, not ok, only 1 TE on each side pls Monkey wrote:
QB,HB/C,FB/C OK So we have to change it a bit on the TE position. Any ideas? |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
sfniner08
|
posted: 2011-09-17 21:37:26 (ID: 10704) Report Abuse |
|
2 te's max on the line. 5 Oline, 2 TE, 1 FB, 1 QB, and 2 WR. The purpose of the goal line package on offense is to make it strong for a short rush but the wr give a little flex to throw.
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Admin
Contact |
posted: 2011-09-17 21:48:21 (ID: 10711) |
|
Here are the rules regarding formations...hopefully I did not forget anything...
Faq: new formations |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Monkey
|
posted: 2011-09-17 23:21:09 (ID: 10733) Report Abuse |
|
Admin wrote:
Monkey wrote:
Goaline offence OT/L,OG/L,OC,OG/R,OT/R, OK Monkey wrote:
TE/L,TE/R,TE/R, not ok, only 1 TE on each side pls Monkey wrote:
QB,HB/C,FB/C OK So we have to change it a bit on the TE position. Any ideas? without the 3rd TE standing off the line of scrimmage its just a bigI formation  |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Monkey
|
posted: 2011-09-17 23:22:19 (ID: 10734) Report Abuse |
|
Buffalo wrote:
Monkey wrote:
Goaline Defense DE/L,DT/L,NT,DT/R,DE/R,OLB/L,MLB,MLB,OLB/R,SS/L,SS/R Thats about right i think I thought the original is DE/L,DT/L,NT,DT/R,DE/R,OLB/L,MLB,MLB,OLB/R,CB/L,CB/R could well be  that was just off the top of my head |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2011-09-18 08:39:19 (ID: 10751) Report Abuse | |
|
Goalline offense normally is a Big package with double TE like the BIG-I and then a 3rd TE/H-Back outside one of the TEs.
Problem with redzoneaction is probably, that it's not meant to have 3 TE, so maybe change that TE/H-Back to a second FB? Possible? Or define a H-Back-Position ... Goalline defense is a very wide field. Teams playing with their regular defense just with different alignments and exchanging normally 1-2 LB with D-Liner if more wight is needed. So every suggested formation is right and wrong, because there are several shades of defenses. This goes up to 6 D-Liner and exchanging corners to SSs or even LB. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< 2 > >| | |
| Main / Suggestions / Defensive Tactic Changes? | |
