no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Discussions / Tempted to sell the star player for established teams? Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 3 4 5 >| | |
| Poster | Message |
|
canonico
|
posted: 2012-08-18 00:26:33 (ID: 52864) Report Abuse |
|
sfniner08 wrote:
Since I have them uploaded in Textats spread sheet anyway the totals are there for the skills that IMO impact the position. So I just divided them up and *2...this is my starters scores QB 65 Draft RB 55 RB 52 FB 51 TE 44 TE 38 WR 63 Draft WR 47 WR 43 OL 56 Draft OL 52 Draft Converted from FB OL 48 Draft Converted from FB OL 46 OL 46 DE 65 Draft DT 64 Draft DT 51 NT 54 DE 53 Draft OLB 65 Draft MLB 72 Draft OLB 72 Draft CB 49 CB 43 SF 50 Draft SF 47 Draft converted from gunner What it does help to tell me is where I am weaker. Offense is my weak point. My secondary needs work for sure. You can also use it to check for overall consistensy by sectors. It can be used for many things, and it is simple enough to do. The results may vary depending on what each user thinks of important skills for each position. And I would definately be more concerned about your secondary, but that's my defensive minded coaching style posting. Playing in 1.1 and with the new engine coming up adding more capacity to the passing game, I'd say you better Watch out, that secondary specialy those 2 CB's seem low when compared to your DL. For what is worth, my best CB as 45.6, my #2 is 40.7 using the same skills method I used on the LB's that you posted, so I doubt that you used those skills to come up with your CB's ESR/EL ratings, I would assime they are much more trained then mine. Anyways my team is currently playing in 2.2 where it's windy and snowing and QB's usualy can't throw or WR can't catch so at this point I ain't worried, but I am starting to plan ahead on my secondary, specialy seeing how big plays are happening in the Friendly engine, I get it that part of it must be do to the bad defense calling, but heck man, even a bad defense call won't cost you 30, 40 or 50+ yards lamost each throw the QB makes, so I'm saying watch your six cuz long throws are coming if this keeps going the way it is.  Source: http://i48.tinypic.com/2h6rdxj.gif |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
sfniner08
|
posted: 2012-08-18 01:07:11 (ID: 52865) Report Abuse |
|
I actually did use the same as defense it is a little more interchangeable.
If I used only Speed, tackle, and vision it would be 3 cb's at 57 each. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
canonico
|
posted: 2012-08-18 01:39:12 (ID: 52866) Report Abuse |
|
sfniner08 wrote:
I actually did use the same as defense it is a little more interchangeable. If I used only Speed, tackle, and vision it would be 3 cb's at 57 each. Ah I see, but I don't think those are enough to ratee a CB, I actualy like the skills that you posted for LB's on CB's to. Maybe TW and INT might not be needed to much, because a CB in terms of Teamwork doesn't really makes sence to take effect, since it is a lonely position to be in. Usualy it's one on one situations, with exceptions. Inteligence might play a part on it to tho, just don't know if so much so as in the LB position. The rest of the skills I think are usefull for both postitions, hence me using them to judge both CB's and LB's equally on that exercise. Even rating my SF I would apply the same skills. But FWIW using Speed, Tackle and Vision, Rates my top two CB's at 43.3 & 46.3. Interesting enough my #1 scores less then my #2 and that's not because he is more well rounded then the #2. The reason why this happens is because my #1 CB has much more Strength then the #2, which I also happen to think a CB needs it to complete tackles. So he scores higher on the first rating scheme, so like I posted it goes from owner to owner, one prefers to rate only 3 or 4 skills others like me think there is more to it... Nice to have variety. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Ranagol
|
posted: 2012-08-18 02:37:54 (ID: 52870) Report Abuse |
|
This is a nice tool, thanks for sharing canonico! But isn't getting i.e. the CB rating with 50 strength as a base kind of misleading? Personally I think having 35 for strength is plenty enough for a CB, so once he reaches that it should be 35/35 so 100% and not 35/50 at 70% which pulls down the overall rating. And that's just off the top of my head for CB.
I guess it depends on the manager how he makes the calculations... |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
canonico
|
posted: 2012-08-18 02:55:52 (ID: 52874) Report Abuse |
|
Ranagol wrote:
This is a nice tool, thanks for sharing canonico! But isn't getting i.e. the CB rating with 50 strength as a base kind of misleading? Personally I think having 35 for strength is plenty enough for a CB, so once he reaches that it should be 35/35 so 100% and not 35/50 at 70% which pulls down the overall rating. And that's just off the top of my head for CB. I guess it depends on the manager how he makes the calculations... Yep, and I prefer to go with 50 because it is the max a player can get in any of the skills mentioned. Will I take it so far, I have no idea and most likely not, but I like to base my numbers on that. But you said it well "It depends on the manager how he makes the calculations..."  |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 3 4 5 >| | |
| Main / Discussions / Tempted to sell the star player for established teams? | |
