no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Discussions / Gamesettings for Quarter/Half Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 >| | |
| Poster | Message |
|
petef
|
posted: 2013-02-18 16:58:53 (ID: 83683) Report Abuse |
|
What I find is a lot of managers want to come up with a way to trick or produce mismatches against the defense. Per Qtr settings would make that far easier but IMO not fair to the defense as it would struggle to adjust on a per qtr basis. I feel we would end up with a shoot out format like another site I could think of where the Defense is more of an after thought.
So  from me to per qtr settings |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
sh8888
|
posted: 2013-02-18 17:12:28 (ID: 83684) Report Abuse |
|
petef wrote:
What I find is a lot of managers want to come up with a way to trick or produce mismatches against the defense. Per Qtr settings would make that far easier but IMO not fair to the defense as it would struggle to adjust on a per qtr basis. I feel we would end up with a shoot out format like another site I could think of where the Defense is more of an after thought. So from me to per qtr settingsI agree with this sentence "What I find is a lot of managers want to come up with a way to trick or produce mismatches against the defense" However, plenty of Managers are currently writing 'trick playbooks' in order to trick the Defense. So why not make their life easier, and more importantly, their playbooks more realistic and less gimmicky by allowing per Quarter Match Settings ? btw ..."I feel we would end up with a shoot out format like another site I could think" ......... no idea which site that is, but it sounds fantastic   |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
bwadders76
|
posted: 2013-02-18 18:16:58 (ID: 83691) Report Abuse |
|
sh8888 wrote:
petef wrote:
What I find is a lot of managers want to come up with a way to trick or produce mismatches against the defense. Per Qtr settings would make that far easier but IMO not fair to the defense as it would struggle to adjust on a per qtr basis. I feel we would end up with a shoot out format like another site I could think of where the Defense is more of an after thought. So from me to per qtr settingsI agree with this sentence "What I find is a lot of managers want to come up with a way to trick or produce mismatches against the defense" However, plenty of Managers are currently writing 'trick playbooks' in order to trick the Defense. So why not make their life easier, and more importantly, their playbooks more realistic and less gimmicky by allowing per Quarter Match Settings ? btw ..."I feel we would end up with a shoot out format like another site I could think" ......... no idea which site that is, but it sounds fantastic Totally agree and this would make the playbook redundant. Why spend an hour or so creating a varied playbook when you can have one just as varied in the match settings per quarter? Next we will have someone suggesting offensive audibles to trick the engine ......... wait!  |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
sfniner08
|
posted: 2013-02-19 08:04:40 (ID: 83746) Report Abuse |
|
I don't see this as a big deal really. I mean we can already do this, but it is cumbersome to have a giant list of plays. It would be nice just to make the playbook creating more user friendly. An example would be to have 5 tabs in the playbook for each quarter and OT. I don't understand the objections that this suggestion would really do anything different than is already available.
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Monkey
|
posted: 2013-02-19 08:28:52 (ID: 83755) Report Abuse |
|
sfniner08 wrote:
I don't see this as a big deal really. I mean we can already do this, but it is cumbersome to have a giant list of plays. It would be nice just to make the playbook creating more user friendly. An example would be to have 5 tabs in the playbook for each quarter and OT. I don't understand the objections that this suggestion would really do anything different than is already available. agreed but would need to have a 6th tab as all quarters |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Ranagol
|
posted: 2013-02-19 08:42:46 (ID: 83759) Report Abuse |
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
hosh13
|
posted: 2013-02-19 10:17:14 (ID: 83775) Report Abuse |
...and add in my idea about O's being able to adjust to Ds and you have a real winner. 
This would get a little complex but it wouldn't be mandatory. And in any case it would be less complex than the present PB situation. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Brainburned
|
posted: 2013-02-19 14:07:11 (ID: 83802) Report Abuse |
|
Ah, I haven't found this ones. Everything I mean was said in that suggestions. Like we see it here the opinions are split and it won't come true for now. Correct? |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 >| | |
| Main / Discussions / Gamesettings for Quarter/Half | |
