no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
Main / Discussions / T minus 11.5...wrong...7 hours until Christmas Search Forum | |
Navigation: |< < 1 2 3 6 8 > >| | |
Poster | Message |
JonnyP
|
posted: 2012-08-09 15:50:15 (ID: 51314) Report Abuse |
Buffalo wrote:
JonnyP wrote:
Swordpriest1 wrote:
Am I the only one who thinks this way about this? You credit us with too much intelligence My #1 choice was Okorie - he was drafted only 15th- so we all have differing opinions. I gambled a little placing Filatov at #6 (my 1st round pick) - young WR - plenty of time to train him - hopefully his speed would not be capped - sadly it was, so in hindsight he should have been a 2nd round pick at best. Okorie was #15 on my board . His two Traits are great, but his INT and TW was not good enough to be higher on my board. Filatov was for me a early 2nd round pick. I had you 2nd round pick Negura very high on my board because of his speed. I prefered the 2 traits, 50 speed, and already very high other skills over the slight lack of TW/Int - are we sure Int is as imporant for CBs as it is for LBs? And as for the TW, the guy doesn't need much training!!.. 30-35 TW is far from the end of the world... As I said earlier, we all have different priorities. |
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
ombi
|
posted: 2012-08-09 16:07:28 (ID: 51317) Report Abuse |
I picked #22 this year. The worst draft for me so far, but it's still not horrible. I just didn't get any physical monsters that I usually pick. Some of the better players were at low priority positions for me, and many of them were taken before my 1st round pick anyway.
Got my #1 choice. Needed an OL to help counter old guys. With a retired OL last year, one this year and another who could retire at any time, I needed a good starter. I probably got the best or second best OL in the draft. 45.8 strength, but capped. Good TW, high talent, and young. I think I can find a starting spot for him this year, or make him a backup to help my second stringers. #11 choice was my top QB choice. He had the highest strength in the draft at 39, but has a yellow mark. Still, if the strength caps at 42 or more, I'll be happy. 50 intelligence, 20 years old, 5 talent #61 Easily the worst player I've ever drafted. A RB with yellow on his 37 speed. Talent and strength aren't bad, and no yellow on strength. Maybe a future FB. A little bit old though. |
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
JonnyP
|
posted: 2012-08-09 16:09:51 (ID: 51318) Report Abuse |
Talent is the least important skill in RZA, I didn't even glance at it when sorting my list.
|
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
Swordpriest1
|
posted: 2012-08-09 17:53:56 (ID: 51358) Report Abuse |
JonnyP wrote:
Talent is the least important skill in RZA, I didn't even glance at it when sorting my list. I only downgrade the player if its a 3 1/2* or lower. Something aesthetically displeasing about drafting a guy high who's going to be outtrained by a YA. I know the draftee will be better overall but still... |
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
Swordpriest1
|
posted: 2012-08-09 17:58:34 (ID: 51360) Report Abuse |
cantalupe wrote:
JonnyP wrote:
Swordpriest1 wrote:
Am I the only one who thinks this way about this? You credit us with too much intelligence It depends how one sets up his draft board. I didn't go for best available players, I went for the positions I need. So I put WR/OL/CB at the top and I got that. Perhaps no one needed SF/FB/RB and that's why you got them. ahh... see I dont really do that. My team is stacked on the Def front 7 and I still had a DL and LB in the top 3 just because of how I rated them overall. I'll slightly overvalue certain positions I don't have (IE. OL) but I won't rate one 7-8 spots higher than I think his draft position is. |
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
JonnyP
|
posted: 2012-08-09 18:07:40 (ID: 51362) Report Abuse |
Swordpriest1 wrote:
JonnyP wrote:
Talent is the least important skill in RZA, I didn't even glance at it when sorting my list. I only downgrade the player if its a 3 1/2* or lower. Something aesthetically displeasing about drafting a guy high who's going to be outtrained by a YA. I know the draftee will be better overall but still... Careful with those salaries fella, mine are less than 25% of yours.... |
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
stizz
|
posted: 2012-08-09 19:49:04 (ID: 51401) Report Abuse |
Quote Reply Edit | |
canonico
|
posted: 2012-08-09 19:54:07 (ID: 51404) Report Abuse |
stizz wrote:
<<<<<<<<<<<<< idiot for some reason, marked my bottom of the draft Ks and Ps as "Round 1" luckily I got my #2 and #9 overall picks with my 2nd and 3rd round... A good Kicker is not that bad IMO (Wouldn't take it in the 1st tho), it might end up giving your team alot of wins. And by might i would say will. |
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
ombi
|
posted: 2012-08-09 21:55:49 (ID: 51424) Report Abuse |
JonnyP wrote:
Talent is the least important skill in RZA, I didn't even glance at it when sorting my list. Depends on the position and how bad the talent is. I usually don't care too much, but I want a high talent starting QB. I would also be upset if my starting OL and RB were all 1 star talents. |
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
sfniner08
|
posted: 2012-08-09 22:01:46 (ID: 51425) Report Abuse |
Talent matters to me in only 3 positions...LB, QB, DL
|
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
reply Mark this thread unread | |
Navigation: |< < 1 2 3 6 8 > >| | |
Main / Discussions / T minus 11.5...wrong...7 hours until Christmas |