no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Discussions / PC-training for OL Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 3 4 5 6 > >| | |
| Poster | Message |
| posted: 2012-08-20 14:04:49 (ID: 53092) Report Abuse | |
|
Turtlemania wrote:
pete wrote:
Had a check... For the moment it should be "No Coach is pushing PC"...this is due a speller in the sourcecode. This is not valid for Coaches pushing Speed as well... I will correct that this evening, so on wednesday morning you should see a change... Buffalo: Based on this statement and based on your correct observation that AC OL do not train PC conclusion when i understand admins english correct ist: AC OL is not pushing Speed That is true! Let me rephrase it: Usually ACs support PC, if the position is in need of PC. Due the bug they did not push PC for the moment, except the AC is pushing Speed (like for a WR as example). If the AC is pushing speed, he pushed PC if PC was selected. But none did receive too many training points. It is the other way, the players with coaches not supporting speed, and therefore not supporting PC missed a few points. It is a simple bug |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
sh8888
|
posted: 2012-08-20 14:08:22 (ID: 53095) Report Abuse |
|
pete wrote:
Usually ACs support PC, if the position is in need of PC. Don't all positions need PC ? 
I don't understand.    |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2012-08-20 14:10:03 (ID: 53097) Report Abuse | |
|
sh8888 wrote:
pete wrote:
Usually ACs support PC, if the position is in need of PC. Don't all positions need PC ?
I don't understand. I won't answer with yes or no...but there are positions that don't get pushed, since they don't consume so much PC during a game...is this enough for better understanding? C'mon! |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Buffalo
|
posted: 2012-08-20 14:14:09 (ID: 53098) Report Abuse |
|
pete wrote:
I won't answer with yes or no...but there are positions that don't get pushed, since they don't consume so much PC during a game...is this enough for better understanding? C'mon! My OL loose in most games the most PC , because my defense is so good and sit the most time of the game on the bench and relax. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
ryandinho
|
posted: 2012-08-20 14:16:18 (ID: 53100) Report Abuse |
|
Am I correct in saying that
1) The AC's don't have an added impact to PC in training from today 2) During the game some positions don't lose PC as quickly as others, for example, a RB will tire quicker than an OL or did I read something wrong? |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
sh8888
|
posted: 2012-08-20 14:21:08 (ID: 53103) Report Abuse |
|
pete wrote:
sh8888 wrote:
pete wrote:
Usually ACs support PC, if the position is in need of PC. Don't all positions need PC ?
I don't understand. I won't answer with yes or no...but there are positions that don't get pushed, since they don't consume so much PC during a game...is this enough for better understanding? C'mon! I've got it .... Pete hates Kickers & Punters ! ..... that's why experience is on a per-play basis, so that K & P don't get much experience .... and then he doesn't let the Special Teams AC push their PC training .... so ...yeah ...no doubt about it .... Pete is anti-Kickers/Punters  |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Turtlemania
|
posted: 2012-08-20 14:30:51 (ID: 53105) Report Abuse |
|
pete wrote:
Turtlemania wrote:
pete wrote:
Had a check... For the moment it should be "No Coach is pushing PC"...this is due a speller in the sourcecode. This is not valid for Coaches pushing Speed as well... I will correct that this evening, so on wednesday morning you should see a change... Buffalo: Based on this statement and based on your correct observation that AC OL do not train PC conclusion when i understand admins english correct ist: AC OL is not pushing Speed That is true! Let me rephrase it: Usually ACs support PC, if the position is in need of PC. Due the bug they did not push PC for the moment, except the AC is pushing Speed (like for a WR as example). If the AC is pushing speed, he pushed PC if PC was selected. But none did receive too many training points. It is the other way, the players with coaches not supporting speed, and therefore not supporting PC missed a few points. It is a simple bug Ok great to have understanding here! So last question because of my bad english its not clear: From Wednesday on: will PC be pushed by AC in generall? (so i dont mind exception like K/P - but good statement Sh"eight") |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2012-08-20 15:39:47 (ID: 53117) Report Abuse | |
|
Turtlemania wrote:
pete wrote:
Turtlemania wrote:
pete wrote:
Had a check... For the moment it should be "No Coach is pushing PC"...this is due a speller in the sourcecode. This is not valid for Coaches pushing Speed as well... I will correct that this evening, so on wednesday morning you should see a change... Buffalo: Based on this statement and based on your correct observation that AC OL do not train PC conclusion when i understand admins english correct ist: AC OL is not pushing Speed That is true! Let me rephrase it: Usually ACs support PC, if the position is in need of PC. Due the bug they did not push PC for the moment, except the AC is pushing Speed (like for a WR as example). If the AC is pushing speed, he pushed PC if PC was selected. But none did receive too many training points. It is the other way, the players with coaches not supporting speed, and therefore not supporting PC missed a few points. It is a simple bug Ok great to have understanding here! So last question because of my bad english its not clear: From Wednesday on: will PC be pushed by AC in generall? (so i dont mind exception like K/P - but good statement Sh"eight") If you don't mind the exceptions, we answer this with a clear YES! |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2012-08-20 15:41:40 (ID: 53118) Report Abuse | |
|
ryandinho wrote:
Am I correct in saying that 1) The AC's didn't have an added impact to PC in training until today, we fixed this error, and from wednesday morning (the next training) AC's of most positions have an impact on regular PC training 2) During the game some positions don't lose PC as quickly as others, for example, a RB or OL will tire quicker than an K or P or did I read something wrong? Fixed |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2012-08-20 15:54:43 (ID: 53124) Report Abuse | |
|
sh8888 wrote:
I've got it .... Pete hates Kickers & Punters ! ..... that's why experience is on a per-play basis, so that K & P don't get much experience .... and then he doesn't let the Special Teams AC push their PC training .... so ...yeah ...no doubt about it .... Pete is anti-Kickers/Punters I did not take your post as serious as (maybe?) Turtle, but I feel it is worth an answer. Read this! |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 3 4 5 6 > >| | |
| Main / Discussions / PC-training for OL | |
