no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
Main / Suggestions / Emergency Player designation on QB Position Search Forum | |
Navigation: |< 2 3 > >| | |
Rating: | |
Poster | Message |
Turtlemania
|
posted: 2012-08-22 09:04:01 (ID: 53411) Report Abuse |
Because we had this before that both QB get injured in a game i carry always 3 QB in depth chart
But either i play "dont substitute QB" so i play all the time only one QB Or i would play open and then all 3 would play I would prefer to have on QB an "emergency spot" So this could make it to play #1 and #2 in rotation and #3 would only come in when #1 AND #2 injured in game Personall i do not see exploit risk since QB is only position with only 1 starter need and i can use the "emergency spot" only when field 3 QB |
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
Buffalo
|
posted: 2012-08-22 09:13:00 (ID: 53413) Report Abuse |
You can put your 3. QB as 3rd Kicker and select, never substitute Kicker. If your first 2 QB are injured, than the engine look first for another QB on the DC and would find the QB as K.
|
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
Turtlemania
|
posted: 2012-08-22 09:15:38 (ID: 53414) Report Abuse |
Buffalo wrote:
You can put your 3. QB as 3rd Kicker and select, never substitute Kicker. If your first 2 QB are injured, than the engine look first for another QB on the DC and would find the QB as K. Sounds as good workaround and has the same effect as i want If it really works this way: thank you Buffalo So maybe please Admin can confirm and then close this topic |
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
posted: 2012-08-22 09:18:37 (ID: 53415) Report Abuse | |
Sorry, but I cannot confirm "abuse"...I hope you will understand that.
I am thinking quite a bit different: If you take the risk of having no QB due injuries, take it. If you don't like that way, carry a third QB, and by this consume one DC-slot. |
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
Turtlemania
|
posted: 2012-08-22 09:20:31 (ID: 53416) Report Abuse |
pete wrote:
Sorry, but I cannot confirm "abuse"...I hope you will understand that. Sure i do So then what do you think about my suggestion since this would help close a possible "hole" |
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
Buffalo
|
posted: 2012-08-22 09:21:28 (ID: 53417) Report Abuse |
pete wrote:
Sorry, but I cannot confirm "abuse"...I hope you will understand that. I am thinking quite a bit different: If you take the risk of having no QB due injuries, take it. If you don't like that way, carry a third QB, and by this consume one DC-slot. I think you mean "misuse" instead of "abuse". |
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
posted: 2012-08-22 09:22:41 (ID: 53418) Report Abuse | |
Buffalo wrote:
pete wrote:
Sorry, but I cannot confirm "abuse"...I hope you will understand that. I am thinking quite a bit different: If you take the risk of having no QB due injuries, take it. If you don't like that way, carry a third QB, and by this consume one DC-slot. I think you mean "misuse" instead of "abuse". maybe, yes. Blame my english |
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
posted: 2012-08-22 09:24:06 (ID: 53419) Report Abuse | |
Turtlemania wrote:
pete wrote:
Sorry, but I cannot confirm "abuse"...I hope you will understand that. Sure i do So then what do you think about my suggestion since this would help close a possible "hole" As written, for the moment I don't see a hole here. Maybe you could explain a little bit more about the fears, you could use PM if you don't like to reveal things in public. |
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
Turtlemania
|
posted: 2012-08-22 09:26:09 (ID: 53420) Report Abuse |
No it is fine
I took approach so i done my duty and so i will wait and see Thanks for clarification |
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
posted: 2012-08-22 09:54:32 (ID: 53422) Report Abuse | |
Your decision...even I will never understand what's wrong in telling details about possible "exploits", or even "holes". This sounds ... just selfish... somehow...However, it is on you.
|
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
reply Mark this thread unread | |
Navigation: |< 2 3 > >| | |
Main / Suggestions / Emergency Player designation on QB Position |