no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Suggestions / Training affected by anthropomorphic parameters Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 4 5 6 7 > >| | |
| Rating: | |
| Poster | Message |
|
hosh13
|
posted: 2012-09-17 19:39:02 (ID: 57298) Report Abuse |
|
Ok Pete, then the first thing we need to get sorted is what exactly will H/W do. Will they simply limit other physicals or will they directly effect gameplay.
Like I gave as an example earlier - things like greater reach for taller players, greater momentum for heavier (which does not necessarily mean they are strong either)? Or will H/W simply limit spd/str/agility? |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Ranagol
|
posted: 2012-09-17 19:46:21 (ID: 57299) Report Abuse |
|
Suggestions about height & weight will always pop up until they get implemented in some way IMO. So why not implement h&w as special traits? Sounds like a good middle ground to me, plus we already have Heavyweight trait for example. The optimum/avarage just means the player has no (h&w) traits.
Thoughts? |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2012-09-17 19:47:36 (ID: 57300) Report Abuse | |
|
Haha..
"Hey lets do it this way" "OK, then we need to do that way first" "Why not sticking with this way" "Ok, we use another way"... 
Don't get me wrong, but without having averages everybody could agree on (more or less), all additional steps are wasted. This is why I suggest to find the averages and ranges first (1). Then we can decide how it affects the whole thing on training (2), gameplay (3) and so on (4). After that we can discuss about edges (5), cut them (6). And go online (7) So let's stick on 1 for the moment... |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
hosh13
|
posted: 2012-09-17 19:49:54 (ID: 57301) Report Abuse |
|
Do we get facilities to control weight?
If height and weight are related to spd/str/agility, this will give clues about caps (especially if weight is fixed). Do 16yo get taller with age? |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2012-09-17 19:51:26 (ID: 57302) Report Abuse | |
|
hosh13 wrote:
Do we get facilities to control weight? If height and weight are related to spd/str/agility, this will give clues about caps (especially if weight is fixed). Do 16yo get taller with age? That is 4. Please answer 1 first |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
canonico
|
posted: 2012-09-17 19:58:20 (ID: 57309) Report Abuse |
|
pete wrote:
Ok, here we go...again First task is: add height and weight for each of these positions, as range QB RB FB OL WR TE DL LB CB SF K P G KR Let's see if our community can finish this task without sarcasm, bad style arguing, attacking, offending, killings... Yes, you can! The idea is: if we are able to find "the optimum per position", we could this for the existing players, and this optimum would let you use the player as per today. This is the first step... Now show me we can have serious discussions, trusting you 
Did a research and suggested in a diferent thread for discussion, because this one is cluttered. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
sh8888
|
posted: 2012-09-17 19:58:24 (ID: 57310) Report Abuse |
|
If you read my post on Page 1 , you'll see some of the NFL ranges for WR & RB.......... and that doesn't include past players who were taller/shorter and heavier/lighter.
If they are actual players who had an NFL career then surely your 'range' has to include them ? |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2012-09-17 19:59:42 (ID: 57311) Report Abuse | |
|
sh8888 wrote:
If they are actual players who had an NFL career then surely your 'range' has to include them ? Might be, yes |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
hosh13
|
posted: 2012-09-17 20:04:54 (ID: 57314) Report Abuse |
|
Ok, off the top of my head -
OC/OG - 6'1" - 6'11", 6'3" avg, 270-390lb, 320lb avg OT - 6'1" - 6'11", 6'3" avg, 280-400lb, 330lb avg TE - 6'0" - 6'10", 6'4" avg, 250-310lb, 265lb avg WR - 5'8" - 6'8", 6'2" avg, 160-250lb, 210lb avg RB - 5'8" - 6'5", 6'1" avg, 180-280lb, 215lb avg FB - 5'10" - 6'5", 6'1" avg, 220-290lb, 240lb avg QB - 5'11" - 6'10", 6'3" avg, 190-270lb, 220lb avg DL - 6'0" - 6'10", 6'3" avg, 260-380lb, 290lb avg LB - 5'10" - 6'9", 6'3" avg, 210-290lb, 240lb avg DB - 5'9" - 6'6", 6'1" avg, 170-250lb, 210lb avg |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
sh8888
|
posted: 2012-09-17 20:07:14 (ID: 57315) Report Abuse |
|
pete wrote:
sh8888 wrote:
If they are actual players who had an NFL career then surely your 'range' has to include them ? Might be, yes These ranges will go absolutely Nuts then .... have you seen the height of the Tallest NFL players ? ....... I'll post a link and this is from 2011, there might have been some taller in this Year's Draft. Wow ... look at the size of these Guys ! |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 4 5 6 7 > >| | |
| Main / Suggestions / Training affected by anthropomorphic parameters | |
