no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Discussions / Top 100 Traders Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 3 > >| | |
| Poster | Message |
|
KingOfTh3Hil
|
posted: 2012-12-05 10:55:02 (ID: 71084) Report Abuse |
|
sfniner08 wrote:
Nah, you just don't want to admit that spending can and does help winning. Season 5 Teams in the conference championships: Admirals Full Floters #7 buyer Sinna Ladd #40 High Fives #53 Flying Donkeys #55 Claymore Eagels # 11 AlquÃmicos de Urulandia # 51 Dragons Girona #24 SF #3 Majalorca #26 Madrid #36 Fire Mighty Magpies #6 Scheper Rams #56 GLADIATORI ROMA #41 Maykop Skylarks #63 Galaxy San Diego Blitz #5 Falling asleep while typing. I'll look again in the morning and finish this. but all of those teams is pretty old atm, thus having alot of training to their core of players. total time of training for your players, I think that matters more then if you have to buy a few players that will have 30 skillpoints more then the rest of the team. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
sh8888
|
posted: 2012-12-05 11:11:45 (ID: 71089) Report Abuse |
|
sfniner08 wrote:
Nah, you just don't want to admit that spending can and does help winning I'll admit anything if there is some proof/statistical evidence to back it up .... but as a transfer Market obsessive yourself, you seem to have a somewhat biased view on things. To me .... it's about quality .... so spending on quality can and does help winning...... but some of this spending is not on quality at all. Glad that you quoted Dragons, there is a clear example here of how you Don't have to spend big to win. If you look at Majalorca, you'll see that that vast majority of his spending ($250 Million +) was done during November 2012 ..... but Majalorca has been easily the best team in Dragons 1.1 since the start of Season 4 ..... i.e. he didn't need to spend big to win 
If I was slightly more cruel, I might compare SF's spending vs success with Majalorca's spending vs success, but no need to as I think the point has already been well made. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Firenze
|
posted: 2012-12-05 11:24:25 (ID: 71090) Report Abuse |
|
Very interesting stuff.
I'm surprised i'm only 4 mill in the red considering i've turned my roster over at least two times 
I was hoping it would show number of players bought / sold, as well as their $ value. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Viking
|
posted: 2012-12-05 11:27:33 (ID: 71091) Report Abuse |
|
sfniner08 wrote:
Nah, you just don't want to admit that spending can and does help winning. There are also another way to have good strong team, look at High Fives, they have won all they can last season, but before this, they just sell one player and bought 3, from which only one cost more then $1M. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2012-12-05 12:05:10 (ID: 71096) Report Abuse | |
|
Firenze wrote:
You can see that in the transfer history of the team, but not in the top 100 traders listVery interesting stuff. I'm surprised i'm only 4 mill in the red considering i've turned my roster over at least two times
I was hoping it would show number of players bought / sold, as well as their $ value. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
sh8888
|
posted: 2012-12-05 12:06:58 (ID: 71099) Report Abuse |
|
Just a quick question for Dearest Admin ...........
The "Earned" figure says Earned = Sold - Bought , but does the 'Sold' figure include the 5% Transfer Tax or not ? |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Firenze
|
posted: 2012-12-05 12:07:02 (ID: 71100) Report Abuse |
|
pete wrote:
Firenze wrote:
You can see that in the transfer history of the team, but not in the top 100 traders listVery interesting stuff. I'm surprised i'm only 4 mill in the red considering i've turned my roster over at least two times
I was hoping it would show number of players bought / sold, as well as their $ value. I know that, it takes ages for me to scroll down and see my outgoing transfers  |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
sh8888
|
posted: 2012-12-05 12:08:45 (ID: 71101) Report Abuse |
|
Firenze wrote:
I know that, it takes ages for me to scroll down and see my outgoing transfers Repetitive Strain Injuries to the fingers .... the perils of being a Day-Trader  |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2012-12-05 12:09:15 (ID: 71102) Report Abuse | |
|
Firenze wrote:
pete wrote:
Firenze wrote:
You can see that in the transfer history of the team, but not in the top 100 traders listVery interesting stuff. I'm surprised i'm only 4 mill in the red considering i've turned my roster over at least two times
I was hoping it would show number of players bought / sold, as well as their $ value. I know that, it takes ages for me to scroll down and see my outgoing transfers Join a psycho, to get healed from your transfer market psychosis
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Firenze
|
posted: 2012-12-05 12:13:52 (ID: 71105) Report Abuse |
|
pete wrote:
Firenze wrote:
pete wrote:
Firenze wrote:
You can see that in the transfer history of the team, but not in the top 100 traders listVery interesting stuff. I'm surprised i'm only 4 mill in the red considering i've turned my roster over at least two times
I was hoping it would show number of players bought / sold, as well as their $ value. I know that, it takes ages for me to scroll down and see my outgoing transfers Join a psycho, to get healed from your transfer market psychosis
Never!  |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 3 > >| | |
| Main / Discussions / Top 100 Traders | |
