no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Discussions / Quick Confirmation needed pls Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 3 > >| | |
| Poster | Message |
|
MTS1972
|
posted: 2013-01-23 16:32:34 (ID: 78081) Report Abuse |
|
surely the #1 WR (for eg) will always start in his chosen/preferred/selected spot as per the DC and will play every snap until he is below the given percentage - sub comes into his place - but as soon as his PC/energy is back above the 'sub out' level he comes back in to his own slot?
He wouldnt get moved around to cover others as he is the one for whom cover is given - its not a rotation system surely? |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
MTS1972
|
posted: 2013-01-23 16:35:07 (ID: 78083) Report Abuse |
|
to follow on from that, i dont believe the DC allows you to change a players position according to which formation you use either? so if he is WR1, he will always be WR1, unless subbed out - but then goes back into WR 1 once recovered?
WRs 3,4,5 and 6 may well move around - but a manager isnt likely (unless he has an abundance of riches) to put his Star Man in at 3,4,5 or 6? |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
sfniner08
|
posted: 2013-01-23 16:51:13 (ID: 78088) Report Abuse |
|
Nope. My #1 WR plays both left and right through out the game. When they come back in they don't automatically go back to the side of field they started on.
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
MTS1972
|
posted: 2013-01-23 16:54:42 (ID: 78091) Report Abuse |
|
sfniner08 wrote:
Nope. My #1 WR plays both left and right through out the game. When they come back in they don't automatically go back to the side of field they started on. Tits. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Ranagol
|
posted: 2013-01-23 17:03:50 (ID: 78094) Report Abuse |
|
Yep, it's like that. So when your WR1 gets tired and subbed out, your WR2 will fill the 1st spot, then the WR3 fills the 2nd and on it goes. When your WR1 comes back up he'll be at the end of the list filling up whatever position that's left afaik
 |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Buffalo
|
posted: 2013-01-26 17:01:55 (ID: 78723) Report Abuse |
|
Ranagol wrote:
Yep, it's like that. So when your WR1 gets tired and subbed out, your WR2 will fill the 1st spot, then the WR3 fills the 2nd and on it goes. When your WR1 comes back up he'll be at the end of the list filling up whatever position that's left afaik This seem to be wrong. I had this lineup in in the 4WR SG today in the 4.quarter. WRl:WR#5 WRr:WR#2 WRli:WR#1 WRri:WR#4 It seem that WR#1 and #3 were tired. First WR#5 replaced WR#1. WR#6 was injured and could not replace WR#3, so WR#1 replaced #3. Really confusing. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Ranagol
|
posted: 2013-01-26 17:27:44 (ID: 78729) Report Abuse |
|
Buffalo wrote:
Ranagol wrote:
Yep, it's like that. So when your WR1 gets tired and subbed out, your WR2 will fill the 1st spot, then the WR3 fills the 2nd and on it goes. When your WR1 comes back up he'll be at the end of the list filling up whatever position that's left afaik
This seem to be wrong. I had this lineup in in the 4WR SG today in the 4.quarter. WRl:WR#5 WRr:WR#2 WRli:WR#1 WRri:WR#4 It seem that WR#1 and #3 were tired. First WR#5 replaced WR#1. WR#6 was injured and could not replace WR#3, so WR#1 replaced #3. Really confusing. Hmm you're right. So the DC lineup always stays as is if the WR is above the set energy %? Like #2 will always be #2 if he can stay above the set energy % and those who get tired get replaced by the next in line like with #1 and #5? I guess the injured #6 got replaced by #1 because even when below the set %, he still had more energy than #3? Help us mighty Yoda, you are our only hope!  |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2013-01-26 19:04:08 (ID: 78762) Report Abuse | |
|
i am there, my tongue burning (had maroccan burger, quite spicy) and dont understand the confusion
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Buffalo
|
posted: 2013-01-27 08:51:30 (ID: 78866) Report Abuse |
|
We are a little bit confused about the substitutions.
We thought it would be like this. The substitution rule is e.g. ( <70%). So we expected that WR2 would replace and WR3 would play for WR2 and so on. Now it look more like this. Engine fills the WR spots depending on the DC first. WR1 (below 70%) WR2 (above 70%) WR3 (below 70%) WR4 (above 70%) Than the engine look if there are players <70% and substitute them with the remaining WRs on the DC. So WR1 is below<70% and will be replaced by WR5. WR3 is also below <70%, but there is no more WR above 70% left. So the engine pick again from top to bottom and s e l e c t WR1 with <70% to fill the spot of WR3. Is this right? Last edited on 2013-01-27 10:01:42 by Buffalo |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2013-01-27 09:29:10 (ID: 78875) Report Abuse | |
|
if wr3 is below the subst threshold too, this is not valid anymore...
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 3 > >| | |
| Main / Discussions / Quick Confirmation needed pls | |
