no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Rookie Area / Summary of preferred skills by position? Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< 2 3 > >| | |
| Poster | Message |
|
occam
|
posted: 2011-12-01 13:57:49 (ID: 18286) Report Abuse |
|
Greetings,
I've been looking a bit for a summary of preferred skills by position. Does any such suggestion list exist? Obviously, the individual position descriptions but I was hoping for a beginners crib sheet to get started. Thanks in advance. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Lee1950
|
posted: 2011-12-01 14:07:10 (ID: 18290) Report Abuse |
|
Everyone on defense benefits from Intel, Vision, Positioning, and Tackling.
QB Intel, Str, Vision rest of offense pretty mixed bag, but about what you would guess.... When the Season 2 Draft Board is available, you will get a good look at good players. Welcome to RZA! Last edited on 2011-12-01 14:11:42 by Lee1950 |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
sfniner08
|
posted: 2011-12-01 20:55:34 (ID: 18418) Report Abuse |
|
Everyone on def needs intelligence? Even the DT, DE? I thought it was pretty much the MLB and safety that need intel.
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
NYDOGS
|
posted: 2011-12-01 20:56:35 (ID: 18419) Report Abuse |
|
Same for me... It depends on the managers and Int never hurts!!!
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Lee1950
|
posted: 2011-12-01 21:31:00 (ID: 18438) Report Abuse |
|
Well....
I am going by a small sample of highly skilled players....my Draft pool. Please note - Admin has pointed out in another thread that my sample base is still quite small! You can probably safely assume a +/- 10% error at most/all of the positions. After scouting (@Scout=20) those 96 players and plugging them into a spreadsheet, average INT ranked #1 QB (Only 1 QB in my sample data base, but makes sense) #2 LB (14 of them, so relatively good data base) #3 WR (sample size =4, a bit random) #4 P (sample size =6) #5 K (sample size =2, pretty random, but correlates with P) #6 DL (sample size =17) #7 SF (sample size =5, a bit random) #8 TE (sample size =1, so quite random) #9 OL (sample size =18) #10 G (sample size =9) #11 FB (sample size =2, pretty random) #12 CB (sample size =5, a bit random) #13 RB (sample size =8) #14 KR (sample size =6) I don't think this is giving away much info, but if it is, Admin: Please clear it. So: Other than CBs. it looks to me as if INT is more important on Defense, overall, than Offense. Since RB, FB, and KR are nicely grouped at the low end, you can probably get by with lower INT ball carriers than you can with low INT defenders. DL and OL averages were only 1 point apart, so they could easily be reversed in importance, given the data size. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
NYDOGS
|
posted: 2011-12-01 21:32:58 (ID: 18439) Report Abuse |
|
Yes but in your team players with good speed, average tackle and bad int have 2.5 stars as CB
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Lee1950
|
posted: 2011-12-01 21:34:48 (ID: 18440) Report Abuse |
|
Well, almost everyone has at least 2* at CB. The Game Engine rates everyone high at that position.
 |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
NYDOGS
|
posted: 2011-12-01 21:35:45 (ID: 18441) Report Abuse |
|
That's why all my players are CB!!!
 |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
sfniner08
|
posted: 2011-12-01 22:57:29 (ID: 18456) Report Abuse |
|
Lee1950 wrote:
Well.... I am going by a small sample of highly skilled players....my Draft pool. Please note - Admin has pointed out in another thread that my sample base is still quite small! You can probably safely assume a +/- 10% error at most/all of the positions. After scouting (@Scout=20) those 96 players and plugging them into a spreadsheet, average INT ranked #1 QB (Only 1 QB in my sample data base, but makes sense) #2 LB (14 of them, so relatively good data base) #3 WR (sample size =4, a bit random) #4 P (sample size =6) #5 K (sample size =2, pretty random, but correlates with P) #6 DL (sample size =17) #7 SF (sample size =5, a bit random) #8 TE (sample size =1, so quite random) #9 OL (sample size =18) #10 G (sample size =9) #11 FB (sample size =2, pretty random) #12 CB (sample size =5, a bit random) #13 RB (sample size =8) #14 KR (sample size =6) I don't think this is giving away much info, but if it is, Admin: Please clear it. So: Other than CBs. it looks to me as if INT is more important on Defense, overall, than Offense. Since RB, FB, and KR are nicely grouped at the low end, you can probably get by with lower INT ball carriers than you can with low INT defenders. DL and OL averages were only 1 point apart, so they could easily be reversed in importance, given the data size. I would be surprised to see a DT or DE need high intelligence. I mean that position is just, see the qb, hit the qb or see the rb hit the rb. Doesn't take much brain power to play those two positions. LB? Absolutley, especially mlb. Olb to a lesser degree. Saftey for sure. Cb more so than a d linemen. I mean that is how it would play out in the real world. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Lee1950
|
posted: 2011-12-01 23:02:57 (ID: 18457) Report Abuse |
|
sfniner08 wrote:I would be surprised to see a DT or DE need high intelligence. I mean that position is just, see the qb, hit the qb or see the rb hit the rb. Doesn't take much brain power to play those two positions.
I guess my High School coach knew what he was doing when he put me at DE....... |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< 2 3 > >| | |
| Main / Rookie Area / Summary of preferred skills by position? | |
