no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Discussions / SG 4WRs vs 3-4-4 / 3-3-5 coverage assignments Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 >| | |
| Poster | Message |
|
alexshans84
|
posted: 2013-03-21 06:47:59 (ID: 87645) Report Abuse |
|
hosh13 wrote:
Outside being toward the sideline, inside being toward the middle. Whether it's an outside or inside WR or a TE matters not. It seems to me that in 4 WR set 2 outside WRs always run outside routes and 2 inside WRs run inside routes on their side or middle route. So your outside WRs have only one route to run and your inside WRs have 2 routes to run. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
wiesengrund
|
posted: 2013-03-21 07:32:37 (ID: 87647) Report Abuse |
|
Buffalo wrote:
It is definitly a zone thing and it seem to be that a good CB can cover 2 WR. For sure he need enough Speed and tactical skills to be in the range of both WR. Yes, there were already some observations on the fact that #1/#2 CBs cover inner passes too, at least in the Dime. It would follow that they probably also have the first tackle opporunity to inner passes against the SG4, though I never tested that. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
panoramix
|
posted: 2013-03-21 12:00:47 (ID: 87665) Report Abuse |
|
Buffalo wrote:it seem to be that a good CB can cover 2 WR
Lol, Spiderman? 
I know this is true, but unrealistic too. Last edited on 2013-03-21 12:02:40 by panoramix |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 >| | |
| Main / Discussions / SG 4WRs vs 3-4-4 / 3-3-5 coverage assignments | |
