Login
no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Galaxy / Eternal Galaxy 1.1 Ranking Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 3 4 5 >| | |
| Poster | Message |
| posted: 2014-06-15 10:41:04 (ID: 100035917) Report Abuse | |
|
And that is the Top 30 Galaxy 1.1 Ranking (Average Wins League + PO)
incl. Saison 12 The same as in the Total List; BOTs are marked with : BOT  Source: http://i58.tinypic.com/24xzzut.png |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2014-06-15 10:41:47 (ID: 100035918) Report Abuse | |
|
Those 4 leading are my favorites to enter toptop...we will see...
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2014-06-15 10:48:32 (ID: 100035920) Report Abuse | |
|
And finally
The Eternal Champions of Galaxy 1.1 Since Saison 2  Source: http://i62.tinypic.com/21o2azt.png Standings: AC 6 - NC 5. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Toni Gorilla
|
posted: 2014-06-15 11:21:27 (ID: 100035924) Report Abuse |
|
Thanks again, Kottan.
 |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2014-06-18 17:50:10 (ID: 100036419) Report Abuse | |
|
Kottan wrote:
And finally The Eternal Champions of Galaxy 1.1 Since Saison 2 Source: http://i62.tinypic.com/21o2azt.png Standings: AC 6 - NC 5. The problem is, I'm something like 3-4 in championships....oh what could have been. I think the Bandits are 3-0 in the finale, no? Steve SD Blitz |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2014-06-18 18:41:36 (ID: 100036425) Report Abuse | |
|
Solana_Steve wrote:
The problem is, I'm something like 3-4 in championships....oh what could have been. I think the Bandits are 3-0 in the finale, no? Steve SD Blitz It is Steve what you've written everything correctly. Now you want a further criterion: efficiency Then arises: Bandits: 3 WINS from 3 entries = 100% Blitz: 3 WINS by 7 participations = 42.86% And maybe add f.e.Turtles 0 WINS in 3 Bowls = 0 % But I do think that this list has little meaning. Or am I wrong? Kottan |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2014-06-18 21:35:20 (ID: 100036453) Report Abuse | |
|
Kottan wrote:
Solana_Steve wrote:
The problem is, I'm something like 3-4 in championships....oh what could have been. I think the Bandits are 3-0 in the finale, no? Steve SD Blitz It is Steve what you've written everything correctly. Now you want a further criterion: efficiency Then arises: Bandits: 3 WINS from 3 entries = 100% Blitz: 3 WINS by 7 participations = 42.86% And maybe add f.e.Turtles 0 WINS in 3 Bowls = 0 % But I do think that this list has little meaning. Or am I wrong? Kottan Not really...it's just a measure of conference titles and championship futility. As for Turtles, that's not really a fair number as the game engine was biased against them. :-) Steve SD Blitz |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2014-06-19 08:49:34 (ID: 100036515) Report Abuse | |
|
Solana_Steve wrote:
Kottan wrote:
Solana_Steve wrote:
The problem is, I'm something like 3-4 in championships....oh what could have been. I think the Bandits are 3-0 in the finale, no? Steve SD Blitz It is Steve what you've written everything correctly. Now you want a further criterion: efficiency Then arises: Bandits: 3 WINS from 3 entries = 100% Blitz: 3 WINS by 7 participations = 42.86% And maybe add f.e.Turtles 0 WINS in 3 Bowls = 0 % But I do think that this list has little meaning. Or am I wrong? Kottan Not really...it's just a measure of conference titles and championship futility. As for Turtles, that's not really a fair number as the game engine was biased against them. :-) Steve SD Blitz What are the three better WINS? Blitz with 7 bowl appearances or Bandits with only 3 entries. Or in other words: more bowl appearances or effectiveness is better? I think this is a matter of opinion. Therefore, I would count only the Bowl victories. Because in the end it is only important who is the winner. I don´t want a ranking the runner-ups. Last edited on 2014-06-19 08:49:56 by Kottan |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 3 4 5 >| | |
| Main / Galaxy / Eternal Galaxy 1.1 Ranking | |
