no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Suggestions / New Training Suggestion Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< >| | |
| Rating: | |
| Poster | Message |
|
Captain Jack
|
posted: 2022-12-14 15:46:30 (ID: 100170950) Report Abuse |
|
I have been giving some thought to training and also how to help new managers. I will give my brief thoughts on this to see what comes out of it. This is how I see it:
Problem 1) Managers sign players to their Youth Academy but have no idea in what position their players will end up playing. (The younger the players the more difficult it is to decide). 2) New managers inherit a team which will typically not have the best players in the best positions. For them it is quite a steep learning curve and although we have both the manual and Jack’s Guide it would take quite a while to read through them. Also some of the information may be confusing to them or just not understood. My suggestion is that rather than allocate positional coaches to players in the Youth Academy we introduce Youth Skill Coaches (YSC). These would work much in the same way that Facilities do and we would have YSC for each of STR, SPD, TKL, BLK etc. This helps newer managers because they don’t have to work out “Should I allocate all 20 of my Youth to the DL coach or the RB coach etc.?” Once the Youth have reached their physical caps, managers then have the choice of the next skills to train. Perhaps the manager needs a strong defensive player but is still uncertain if this player will be DL, LB, CB or SF. However, all such players will need TKL so they get allocated to the YSC who trains in TKL and so on. At this point players would not have a set position but their ‘position’ would just be YA and they would be allocated to one YSC coach at a time. At some point a manager will decide a position for the player. Then the player could be allocated to the DL, LB etc coach who will train them in positional skills. We could then introduce something similar for new managers to use on their squad. Whereas it seems we currently have an 8 week grace period for them to be able to change player positions, why not, instead of this allow them to have an 8 week period (or whatever is decided) to have additional training using one of the YSC? So, for example, a new manager has several players who need to improve their TKL skills instead of trying to work out “should I allocate all 15 to my DL or LB or SF or CB coach?” The manager just adds all 15 to his YSC TKL guru and so on for other skills needed. We would probably need to allow for a New Manager (within 8 weeks or so) to be able to allocate their players to both a positional coach and a YSC. The question then, I guess, is ‘does that make present Coaches less valuable? If so, then to offset that they could have a slight improvement in their positional training stats and/or their effect on the gameplay. Over to you…… |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
BlindLark
|
posted: 2022-12-14 20:26:27 (ID: 100170967) Report Abuse |
|
Alternatively, and simpler, just have all players who have a "free position switch" designation (such as YA players) automatically default to your best position coach each training for whatever skill(s) they're working on, regardless of position. That way no one has to finesse the system by switching all their players over temporarily to whatever position has your best coach for their skills.
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Captain Jack
|
posted: 2022-12-14 20:46:46 (ID: 100170969) Report Abuse |
|
That does sound much simpler!
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
pderekdactyl
|
posted: 2022-12-14 20:51:41 (ID: 100170970) Report Abuse |
|
BlindLark wrote:
Alternatively, and simpler, just have all players who have a "free position switch" designation (such as YA players) automatically default to your best position coach each training for whatever skill(s) they're working on, regardless of position. That way no one has to finesse the system by switching all their players over temporarily to whatever position has your best coach for their skills. It would have to be done separately for Physical vs Not Physical skills, though. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2022-12-15 06:56:05 (ID: 100170980) Report Abuse | |
|
pderekdactyl wrote:
BlindLark wrote:
Alternatively, and simpler, just have all players who have a "free position switch" designation (such as YA players) automatically default to your best position coach each training for whatever skill(s) they're working on, regardless of position. That way no one has to finesse the system by switching all their players over temporarily to whatever position has your best coach for their skills. It would have to be done separately for Physical vs Not Physical skills, though. How can a best-match-approach be torn between two aspects. I think the suggestion is meant as you do training say 50% STR and 50% VIS, the player gets the best result based on who supports STR? Which has the best CP of that group? I think it would be fair to let the random thing kick in here and to to put an additional who had the best calculated CP on that day into it. The player gets STR training on the selected AC. Same for VIS, who supports? Who has best CP? Training from that AC. In that sense, individually on physicals and non-physicals, if you meant it that way. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< >| | |
| Main / Suggestions / New Training Suggestion | |
