no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / American Football in real life / SUPER BOWL LVII Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 >| | |
| Poster | Message |
| posted: 2023-02-13 10:57:27 (ID: 100172130) Report Abuse | |
|
Solana_Steve wrote:
What was the interruptions? Steve SD Blitz The streaming was interupted for a few minutes, as it is tradition in bowls for the NFL. One would think such a multi billion dollar enterprise like the nfl should have the ressources to run a stream, but hey ... |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Krysgen
|
posted: 2023-02-13 18:50:58 (ID: 100172138) Report Abuse |
|
The chiefs won because they bought the refs...
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2023-02-13 21:40:58 (ID: 100172140) Edits found: 1 Report Abuse | |
|
To be honest, I did not see any major flaws in the referees action. For me, there was only one questionable thing, and that was overruling the completion of that pass early in the game. For my taste, this was enough possession of the ball to call it ccomplete, or at least did I not see enough evidence to overrule the call on the field.
Last edited on 2023-02-13 23:03:24 by pete |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2023-02-13 23:17:01 (ID: 100172144) Report Abuse | |
|
Btw, even Bradberry himself told it was a holding. And I read some people saying "yes, but you cannot call it in that situation". I truly believe this is rubbish. A holding is a holding, no matter at what game it happens, at what time in the game it happens, and no matter what the call might cause, or even it the call might change the outcome of the game.
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2023-02-14 00:03:22 (ID: 100172145) Report Abuse | |
|
pete wrote:
Btw, even Bradberry himself told it was a holding. And I read some people saying "yes, but you cannot call it in that situation". I truly believe this is rubbish. A holding is a holding, no matter at what game it happens, at what time in the game it happens, and no matter what the call might cause, or even it the call might change the outcome of the game. Correct outlook. Clear hold, there's no way a ref could get away with not calling it. It'll affect the game the same as a no-call, might as well do your job as correct as possible. Also, it was one play. Eagles made mistakes and were obviously out-coached in the second half. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Krysgen
|
posted: 2023-02-14 12:31:37 (ID: 100172149) Report Abuse |
|
pete wrote:
To be honest, I did not see any major flaws in the referees action. For me, there was only one questionable thing, and that was overruling the completion of that pass early in the game. For my taste, this was enough possession of the ball to call it ccomplete, or at least did I not see enough evidence to overrule the call on the field. Btw, even Bradberry himself told it was a holding. And I read some people saying "yes, but you cannot call it in that situation". I truly believe this is rubbish. A holding is a holding, no matter at what game it happens, at what time in the game it happens, and no matter what the call might cause, or even it the call might change the outcome of the game. Thanks for pointing that out. I was with Greg Olsen, who also was one of the persons saying there wasn't enough contact for a flag. Didn't know that the player "confessed". But that pass-review was even stranger to get overturned. Well it was a close game and who blames the chiefs to manage the playtime. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 >| | |
| Main / American Football in real life / SUPER BOWL LVII | |
