no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Discussions / Introducing Coaches (Head coach and Assistent coaches) Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 3 48 50 > >| | |
| Poster | Message |
|
Lee1950
|
posted: 2012-01-16 17:27:32 (ID: 24229) Report Abuse |
|
In addition to the game day bonus, I also wanted to focus my training on the running game. So High CP RB Assistant Coach and OL AC.
I figure a strong OL never hurts, because later I want to focus on my passing game. My RB AC is older than I am  , so I'm hoping he stays around another couple seasons until my RB cadre is where I want it. Then when he retires, I'll switch to training the passing game.
btw - I was not impressed with my 97 CP head coach's debut. 0-7 loss.  |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Turtlemania
|
posted: 2012-01-16 18:42:25 (ID: 24240) Report Abuse |
|
Lee1950 wrote:
btw - I was not impressed with my 97 CP head coach's debut. 0-7 loss. Because effects are not active already i think this is not reason for your loss. As i understand such type of engine changes only at start of new season or i understand wrong? |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Buffalo
|
posted: 2012-01-16 18:53:29 (ID: 24242) Report Abuse |
|
Turtlemania wrote:
Lee1950 wrote:
btw - I was not impressed with my 97 CP head coach's debut. 0-7 loss. Because effects are not active already i think this is not reason for your loss. As i understand such type of engine changes only at start of new season or i understand wrong? No, you are right. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Lee1950
|
posted: 2012-01-16 19:54:16 (ID: 24252) Report Abuse |
|
Buffalo wrote:
Turtlemania wrote:
Lee1950 wrote:
btw - I was not impressed with my 97 CP head coach's debut. 0-7 loss. Because effects are not active already i think this is not reason for your loss. As i understand such type of engine changes only at start of new season or i understand wrong? No, you are right. Oh. I guess that means my 3-game losing streak is my fault.  |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2012-01-17 08:24:02 (ID: 24291) Report Abuse | |
|
Peter, you have the exp-gain-formular under the con-chapter.
 |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Admin
Contact |
posted: 2012-01-17 08:39:04 (ID: 24294) |
|
jack6 wrote:
Peter, you have the exp-gain-formular under the con-chapter. Ups, fixed  |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Admin
Contact |
posted: 2012-02-09 18:53:45 (ID: 27663) |
|
Later this evening we will activate coaches for the simulation engine.
As written earlier: the higher an ACs CP is, the better players on that position will perform. This means nothing else than a TE Coach will increase the performance only if the TE is set to be a TE in the player details, and is playing on the field as TE! The math $factor=(($cp + 45 + 1000) / 1100) + (rand(-50,50) / 10000) This will result in something like +-5%, if the player is playing his position, on the skills the AC is affecting. There is no direct advantage from your Head coach at the moment. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Turtlemania
|
posted: 2012-02-09 19:14:09 (ID: 27664) Report Abuse |
|
Admin wrote:
This will result in something like +-5%, if the player is playing his position, on the skills the AC is affecting. Without do any math just a simple question: When i have AC: it is possible, that the player play worse than they could? Dont get me wrong, but then please i want to have some more details (formula) what happens when i do not have AC at all! Screw the bonus on training - then i want to decide if its worth to pay Millions per seasons on ACs just for a "random" chance Please dont get me wrong: i like random factors, but not when its total illogic - my 5 cents. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Admin
Contact |
posted: 2012-02-09 19:21:48 (ID: 27665) |
|
Turtlemania wrote:
Admin wrote:
This will result in something like +-5%, if the player is playing his position, on the skills the AC is affecting. Without do any math just a simple question: When i have AC: it is possible, that the player play worse than they could? Dont get me wrong, but then please i want to have some more details (formula) what happens when i do not have AC at all! Screw the bonus on training - then i want to decide if its worth to pay Millions per seasons on ACs just for a "random" chance Please dont get me wrong: i like random factors, but not when its total illogic - my 5 cents. No coaches: the player will act based on the CP shown in the COaches Overview. There is a little chance on Low CP coaches the player could act worse than without a Coach, yes. Consider this to be a "penalty" for the YA-TP-Hunters. The randomness in this formula is very very ... very low. So the COach is the trigger, not the RNG. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Turtlemania
|
posted: 2012-02-09 19:32:52 (ID: 27666) Report Abuse |
|
Ok and thanks for quick reply!
Admin wrote:
This will result in something like +-5%, if the player is playing his position, on the skills the AC is affecting. This range is referring to AC from 0 to 100 - correct? Sure you can guess i did maths meanwhile - so its just for cross check and confirmation  |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 3 48 50 > >| | |
| Main / Discussions / Introducing Coaches (Head coach and Assistent coaches) | |
