no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
Main / Sea Devils / Sea Devils Hall Of Fame - Discussions Search Forum | |
Navigation: |< < 1 3 35 36 37 > >| | |
Poster | Message |
JohnnyAce
|
posted: 2017-02-17 19:42:57 (ID: 100098212) Report Abuse |
I suggest
1- we make it a little hard to get in there so only 1 team voted in per season. 2- each committee member only nominate 2 teams. |
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
posted: 2017-02-18 13:19:30 (ID: 100098252) Report Abuse | |
Just a comment here, since I did create the Monarchs system and I do also basically do all the work.
The presentation is my stuff, this could have been done easier, but I wanted to have the full stats available. The reason for the selection process is to have a clear path to become eligable and to have the community in it for the whole process. I did leave the bar quite low for being eligable, since I wanted to have the managers remembered for being part of the region, not because of their winning record. There were several teams in our region which had always the top teams ahead of them and did basically win nothing, but did play fair and hard over severals seasons, which is still a great thing. And the voting process is also a bit complicated to have again the community full in it. I always say ALL CAN VOTE and get 10 votes max. Regaring your commitee: Did anyone ask the guys, whether they would like to be part of it? I wish you all the best to make this happen. |
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
Browka
|
posted: 2017-02-18 13:44:49 (ID: 100098255) Report Abuse |
jack6 wrote:
The reason for the selection process is to have a clear path to become eligable and to have the community in it for the whole process. I did leave the bar quite low for being eligable, since I wanted to have the managers remembered for being part of the region, not because of their winning record. There were several teams in our region which had always the top teams ahead of them and did basically win nothing, but did play fair and hard over severals seasons, which is still a great thing. I see a lot of my team in this part. |
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
Fincyril
|
posted: 2017-02-18 15:50:01 (ID: 100098260) Report Abuse |
jack6 wrote:
Just a comment here, since I did create the Monarchs system and I do also basically do all the work. The presentation is my stuff, this could have been done easier, but I wanted to have the full stats available. The reason for the selection process is to have a clear path to become eligable and to have the community in it for the whole process. I did leave the bar quite low for being eligable, since I wanted to have the managers remembered for being part of the region, not because of their winning record. There were several teams in our region which had always the top teams ahead of them and did basically win nothing, but did play fair and hard over severals seasons, which is still a great thing. And the voting process is also a bit complicated to have again the community full in it. I always say ALL CAN VOTE and get 10 votes max. Regaring your commitee: Did anyone ask the guys, whether they would like to be part of it? I wish you all the best to make this happen. Thanks for the advices! We will see what we do after some comments from the community. |
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
JohnnyAce
|
posted: 2017-02-18 16:03:11 (ID: 100098261) Report Abuse |
I think your structure is perfect Cyril. I would just like it to be a little more restrictive is all.
|
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
jagreen
|
posted: 2017-02-18 17:05:45 (ID: 100098266) Report Abuse |
I believe it should be restrictive however maybe the first season you allowed four or five teams in?
|
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
spartans11
|
posted: 2017-02-18 17:39:51 (ID: 100098276) Report Abuse |
I agree with JohnnyAce, I like Fincyril original idea. Each league should be a little different. Looking at the list of eligible voters I don't foresee any of them not wanting to participate but if they choose not to, that is there choice.
If we vote on just current active teams I would agree that we should just vote for max of two per season. However, if we can go back and include some of the great managers from the past that have retired I think we should open up the initial voting to include more than just one or two initial inductees. |
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
Fincyril
|
posted: 2017-02-18 18:25:42 (ID: 100098281) Report Abuse |
I compromised and edited the initial post (last part only).
"To integrate the HOF: - Be the top team after the managers vote - For the first 3 votes, be the second team in the ranking and receive at least 10 votes" What do you think? About the schedule, I actualy propose to start the Comittee Votes after the Conference Championships: Comittee's vote opened: 28/02 (after Conf. Champ.) Comittee's vote closed: 03/03 (before Bowl) Managers' vote opened: 05/03 (after Bowl) Manager's vote closed: 15/03 (Day 1 of draft) OK for you? |
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
spartans11
|
posted: 2017-02-18 18:34:05 (ID: 100098282) Report Abuse |
I am on the site everyday so when ever you want to start it works for me.
|
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
Alasdaire
|
posted: 2017-02-20 12:21:46 (ID: 100098380) Report Abuse |
Sounds great. It will take a long time until i will be eligible but perhaps I reach this goal before I go into retirement.
|
|
Quote Reply Edit | |
reply Mark this thread unread | |
Navigation: |< < 1 3 35 36 37 > >| | |
Main / Sea Devils / Sea Devils Hall Of Fame - Discussions |