no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Discussions / Introducing Coaches (Head coach and Assistent coaches) Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 48 49 50 > >| | |
| Poster | Message |
|
Lee1950
|
posted: 2011-12-19 23:58:34 (ID: 20370) Report Abuse |
|
Admin wrote:Only PC is going faster, and we will stick with this rule. But speed / strength / agility are at the same speed than kicking and passing as example.
Aahhh! I was thinking "Fitness=Physical Condition" and overlooked the other Physicals which train same as Skills. Should your post say "Physical points = Physical training percentage out of ((random 25:40 + Teamwork + AC-CP-Formula)/2) ....instead of Fitness? Thanks! |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Turtlemania
|
posted: 2011-12-20 01:22:53 (ID: 20371) Report Abuse |
|
Admin wrote:
What happens if I refuse to use these Coaches? Your team will perform worse during games, compared to a team that has Coaches. Coaches' consistency Each coach has consistency. Consistency is measured from one half to 5 in half star steps, where 1 half star means really inconsistent, and 5 means he is really consistent in making decisions. A coach with a half star of consistency can perform up to 10% worse or better than what his CP is. So consistency is like daily form of your coach. Question based on this snips: Will not have AC e.g. for WR make WR play always more worse compare to have AC for WR with 0,5 Star consistency and 0,5 Star experience and always bad dice roll with result lowest negative consistency faktor Or make simple: without have coach for one position can it happen that its better not having coach compare to have coach with lowest consistency? Thanks for clarification. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Tarjan
|
posted: 2011-12-20 07:01:11 (ID: 20373) Report Abuse |
|
So i have to put a bet on my hc ?
So how many HC will be at the List? Cause if all Division 1 Teams (Big Stadiums  ) will take the better guys of course, and thats OK, but how many "Garbage" coaches will be still there?
I am asking just not to save my money on waiting for a bidding war that my Stadium needs a lot. 
Take Care Last edited on 2011-12-20 07:01:34 by Tarjan |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Admin
Contact |
posted: 2011-12-20 07:22:46 (ID: 20375) |
|
4lb3rt0 wrote:
Too much new things to understand .. 
But sure the game is not boring at all 
My question is: does will remain the training page and the percentages Phisical/skills? If I have a CB AC and I Choose Agility/tackling the AC cares what I choose or not? I beg your pardon if the answer is already done but I tried to Understand also in the test site forum but too much pages and too much math for me  Thee is no change on the training itself. Only the calculation is a bit different. There is no need to change the "How do I handle the training", but you will have to spend some thoughts on the coaches you have to hire. The AC will follow your set rules, so he would go for agility and tackling in your example. But if - as example - tackling is a not supported skill for CBs, you would not get any nadvantage from having this CB AC. !!!Of course this is just an example, and tackling is important for CB!!! |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Admin
Contact |
posted: 2011-12-20 07:24:07 (ID: 20376) |
|
Lee1950 wrote:
Admin wrote:Only PC is going faster, and we will stick with this rule. But speed / strength / agility are at the same speed than kicking and passing as example.
Aahhh! I was thinking "Fitness=Physical Condition" and overlooked the other Physicals which train same as Skills. Should your post say "Physical points = Physical training percentage out of ((random 25:40 + Teamwork + AC-CP-Formula)/2) ....instead of Fitness? Thanks! No, the post is right as far as I can see. We call it Fitness skills everywhere, I guess by renaming it here to "Physical" we would create some more confusion, right? Last edited on 2011-12-20 07:34:55 by Admin |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Admin
Contact |
posted: 2011-12-20 07:25:20 (ID: 20377) |
|
Turtlemania wrote:
Admin wrote:
What happens if I refuse to use these Coaches? Your team will perform worse during games, compared to a team that has Coaches. Coaches' consistency Each coach has consistency. Consistency is measured from one half to 5 in half star steps, where 1 half star means really inconsistent, and 5 means he is really consistent in making decisions. A coach with a half star of consistency can perform up to 10% worse or better than what his CP is. So consistency is like daily form of your coach. Question based on this snips: Will not have AC e.g. for WR make WR play always more worse compare to have AC for WR with 0,5 Star consistency and 0,5 Star experience and always bad dice roll with result lowest negative consistency faktor Or make simple: without have coach for one position can it happen that its better not having coach compare to have coach with lowest consistency? Thanks for clarification. Yes, with a combination of low CON and low EXP and low CP this might be possible on a bad dice roll. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Admin
Contact |
posted: 2011-12-20 07:26:56 (ID: 20378) |
|
Tarjan wrote:
So i have to put a bet on my hc ? So how many HC will be at the List? Cause if all Division 1 Teams (Big Stadiums ) will take the better guys of course, and thats OK, but how many "Garbage" coaches will be still there?
I am asking just not to save my money on waiting for a bidding war that my Stadium needs a lot.
Take Care This is why we have "special weeks", where are flooding the market with coaches. The first week we will have only HCs on the market. You should be able to hire the guy you want. Of course I can not guarantee there won't be any bid wars... |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
schnitlick
|
posted: 2011-12-20 08:12:10 (ID: 20379) Report Abuse |
|
Admin wrote:
Tarjan wrote:
So i have to put a bet on my hc ? So how many HC will be at the List? Cause if all Division 1 Teams (Big Stadiums ) will take the better guys of course, and thats OK, but how many "Garbage" coaches will be still there?
I am asking just not to save my money on waiting for a bidding war that my Stadium needs a lot.
Take Care This is why we have "special weeks", where are flooding the market with coaches. The first week we will have only HCs on the market. You should be able to hire the guy you want. Of course I can not guarantee there won't be any bid wars... Honestly, I don't know if this decision will make this game better. I was affraid that this will soon or later happen in this game. So it will be like elsewhere - bid, bid, bid and creating of astro amount for Coaches... I'm thinking how this can create fairness to all players in the game. Those who have started earlier (at the beginning) and have their stadiums and facilities built up will have a huge advantage against the ones that have just started.. Why don't you just include Salary Cap for players (in the way - you have this and this amount and show me how good team can you build)? |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Admin
Contact |
posted: 2011-12-20 08:17:08 (ID: 20380) |
|
schnitlick wrote:
Admin wrote:
Tarjan wrote:
So i have to put a bet on my hc ? So how many HC will be at the List? Cause if all Division 1 Teams (Big Stadiums ) will take the better guys of course, and thats OK, but how many "Garbage" coaches will be still there?
I am asking just not to save my money on waiting for a bidding war that my Stadium needs a lot.
Take Care This is why we have "special weeks", where are flooding the market with coaches. The first week we will have only HCs on the market. You should be able to hire the guy you want. Of course I can not guarantee there won't be any bid wars... Honestly, I don't know if this decision will make this game better. I was affraid that this will soon or later happen in this game. So it will be like elsewhere - bid, bid, bid and creating of astro amount for Coaches... I'm thinking how this can create fairness to all players in the game. Those who have started earlier (at the beginning) and have their stadiums and facilities built up will have a huge advantage against the ones that have just started.. Why don't you just include Salary Cap for players (in the way - you have this and this amount and show me how good team can you build)? There is a "cap" already, the amount of money you can earn is limited, and it is less than you would need to have a superstar team coached by superstars. Don't get me wrong: The argument "vets will do better" is invalid in my opinion, as this is the nature of such a game concept. Of course vets will have a benefit - and this is the main driver for newcomers...catch the vets and make them struggling. To make it possible for everyone to have a solid bunch of coaches we have those 3 weeks "trial" period. I don't see any reason to call that unfair. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
juveddy
|
posted: 2011-12-20 09:03:55 (ID: 20383) Report Abuse |
|
Only one question for clarity:
Does this change mean that the current, staff-based training will be replaced with this coach-based one? So you can't have staff and coaches at the same time, I guess. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 48 49 50 > >| | |
| Main / Discussions / Introducing Coaches (Head coach and Assistent coaches) | |
