no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Discussions / Less sacks after blitzing implementation Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< 2 > >| | |
| Poster | Message |
|
Buffalo
|
posted: 2012-01-02 17:51:20 (ID: 21794) Report Abuse |
|
I have the impression that after the blitz implemenatiton less sacks were forced.
My best defender hat 25 Sacks last season. After a half season he has now only 4 sacks, while his skills improved. In the hall of fame had the best "Sacker" in season 1 54 Sacks and after a half season 2 the best has only 13. I expected that after the draft monster DE would have a higher impact. What is your impression? Is ist a weak blitzing system or a better protection from OL,TE and FB? |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
strepitoso
|
posted: 2012-01-02 18:53:49 (ID: 21811) Report Abuse |
|
I do not know what causes this but I've noticed that the statistics of sacks have dropped a lot
 |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2012-01-02 21:21:10 (ID: 21841) Report Abuse | |
|
Perhaps better O-Linemen now?
Steve SD Blitz Last edited on 2012-01-02 21:21:23 by Solana_Steve |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Admin
Contact |
posted: 2012-01-02 21:23:52 (ID: 21843) |
|
A "more complex calculation" would be the right answer
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
strepitoso
|
posted: 2012-01-02 21:26:06 (ID: 21844) Report Abuse |
|
Admin wrote:
A "more complex calculation" would be the right answer I think this "more complex calculation" makes the game less realistic.  |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
bellj
|
posted: 2012-01-02 21:44:46 (ID: 21845) Report Abuse |
|
strepitoso wrote:
Admin wrote:
A "more complex calculation" would be the right answer I think this "more complex calculation" makes the game less realistic. Why less realitstic? 54 sacks in one season seems even more unrealistic to me. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Admin
Contact |
posted: 2012-01-02 21:45:04 (ID: 21846) |
|
strepitoso wrote:
Admin wrote:
A "more complex calculation" would be the right answer I think this "more complex calculation" makes the game less realistic. That is a question of long term balancing. Last edited on 2012-01-02 21:45:13 by Admin |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
TombKing
|
posted: 2012-01-02 21:55:53 (ID: 21849) Report Abuse |
|
The funny thing is, after blitz implementation my defense is finally getting some sacks in games. Before that I didn't have a single one in any game.
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Buffalo
|
posted: 2012-01-02 22:01:11 (ID: 21852) Report Abuse |
|
bellj wrote:
Why less realitstic? 54 sacks in one season seems even more unrealistic to me. Don't forget, that we play 31 regular games + playoffs in one season. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
strepitoso
|
posted: 2012-01-02 22:02:49 (ID: 21853) Report Abuse |
|
Buffalo wrote:
bellj wrote:
Why less realitstic? 54 sacks in one season seems even more unrealistic to me. Don't forget, that we play 31 regular games + playoffs in one season. +1 |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< 2 > >| | |
| Main / Discussions / Less sacks after blitzing implementation | |
