no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Discussions / I HATE the Transfer Market... Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 3 5 > >| | |
| Poster | Message |
|
Turtlemania
|
posted: 2012-01-03 12:43:45 (ID: 21968) Report Abuse |
|
Admin wrote:
Maybe we should limit the number of bids a manager could make on one player, at the same time we remove the limits on new bids. So each manager can place up to X bids per player, and the highest one gets it. By this, we could remove the deadline, and transfer the player if there are Y hours with no new bids on him. Let's say X is 5, and Y 24... Interesting one - X is fine, Y is too high - Transfer could go for over 10 days then easily but also gives nice strategic one I could just extend the bid until my next homegame to have more money  |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Admin
Contact |
posted: 2012-01-03 12:46:53 (ID: 21969) |
|
I used Y=24 top allow managers that login once per day, not to miss the brand new prospect on the market
And I am not afraid on the 10 days auction...if it happens, it happens Last edited on 2012-01-03 12:47:27 by Admin |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Buffalo
|
posted: 2012-01-03 12:48:58 (ID: 21970) Report Abuse |
|
Admin wrote:
Maybe we should limit the number of bids a manager could make on one player, at the same time we remove the limits on new bids. So each manager can place up to X bids per player, and the highest one gets it. By this, we could remove the deadline, and transfer the player if there are Y hours with no new bids on him. Let's say X is 5, and Y 24... You can't remove the limit, because I would allow the cheating, which you allways warried about. 5 bids would be ok. I would say a player has to stay a minimum of 2 days on the transfermarket and than the bidding end 12 or 24 hours after the last bid. With no deadline you have to check the TM everyday. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Admin
Contact |
posted: 2012-01-03 12:51:43 (ID: 21971) |
|
Buffalo wrote:
You can't remove the limit, because I would allow the cheating, which you allways warried about. Valid point, Buffalo! The limits have to stay how they are, but the other part of that idea would still work. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Buffalo
|
posted: 2012-01-03 12:56:49 (ID: 21972) Report Abuse |
|
10 Managers = 50 possible bids
They can still raise the prize in a bidding war over 20 Mio. I think limiting the bids in a first step would work. Starting with 5 bids for each team, with the option to reduce it to 4 or 3 if the system don't work. I would first stay with the old deadline system. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2012-01-03 13:04:08 (ID: 21973) Report Abuse | |
|
Buffalo wrote:
10 Managers = 50 possible bids They can still raise the prize in a bidding war over 20 Mio. I think limiting the bids in a first step would work. Starting with 5 bids for each team, with the option to reduce it to 4 or 3 if the system don't work. I would first stay with the old deadline system. 10 managers = 50 bids = 50 days in TM Then the elder players will celebrate their retirement in the TM. I say NO, to this suggestion ! Please let the TM as it is. There are some pro and some cons on the old system. But everyone know these, then I think everyone can live with the ols system. Thank you |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Admin
Contact |
posted: 2012-01-03 13:05:48 (ID: 21974) |
|
Kottan wrote:
10 managers = 50 bids = 50 days in TM Wrong. This is only valid if each manager would wait 23:59:59 to place his bid, and this won't happen, IMO It is not a discussion to replace anything yet or within hours, much more it is just a discussion to find a better way for the future Last edited on 2012-01-03 13:06:30 by Admin |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Buffalo
|
posted: 2012-01-03 13:07:45 (ID: 21975) Report Abuse |
|
Kottan wrote:
Buffalo wrote:
I would first stay with the old deadline system. 10 managers = 50 bids = 50 days in TM ? No 50 days, if we stay with the acutal deadline system. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
panoramix
|
posted: 2012-01-03 13:39:40 (ID: 21981) Report Abuse |
|
Hmmm...and a secret bid?
You can see only that for a player are bidding 8-10 teams, but you can not see the amount until the end of the deadline... |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Lee1950
|
posted: 2012-01-03 13:42:41 (ID: 21983) Report Abuse |
|
Another possibility:
Change the minimum raise amount for the next bid from $1,000 to a 10% increase. It won't make much difference when the bidding is low, but it speeds things along at higher levels... $1,000,000 requires a overbid of $1,100,000 $10,000,000 needs a next bid of $11,000,000 instead of 10,001,000. or, remove the 50% cap on new bids. Then we could raise bids by double or triple or whatever. If you are interested in a player, you can make your max bid and then go to bed. Sorry to keep throwing new wrinkles in - I hope it's helping the debate. I kinda like the Nerfing idea best..... |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 3 5 > >| | |
| Main / Discussions / I HATE the Transfer Market... | |
