no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Galaxy / Eternal Galaxy 1.1 Ranking Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 3 4 5 >| | |
| Poster | Message |
| posted: 2014-06-15 10:41:04 (ID: 100035917) Report Abuse | |
|
And that is the Top 30 Galaxy 1.1 Ranking (Average Wins League + PO)
incl. Saison 12 The same as in the Total List; BOTs are marked with : BOT  Source: http://i58.tinypic.com/24xzzut.png |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2014-06-15 10:41:47 (ID: 100035918) Report Abuse | |
|
Those 4 leading are my favorites to enter toptop...we will see...
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2014-06-15 10:48:32 (ID: 100035920) Report Abuse | |
|
And finally
The Eternal Champions of Galaxy 1.1 Since Saison 2  Source: http://i62.tinypic.com/21o2azt.png Standings: AC 6 - NC 5. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Toni Gorilla
|
posted: 2014-06-15 11:21:27 (ID: 100035924) Report Abuse |
|
Thanks again, Kottan.
 |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2014-06-18 17:50:10 (ID: 100036419) Report Abuse | |
|
Kottan wrote:
And finally The Eternal Champions of Galaxy 1.1 Since Saison 2 Source: http://i62.tinypic.com/21o2azt.png Standings: AC 6 - NC 5. The problem is, I'm something like 3-4 in championships....oh what could have been. I think the Bandits are 3-0 in the finale, no? Steve SD Blitz |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2014-06-18 18:41:36 (ID: 100036425) Report Abuse | |
|
Solana_Steve wrote:
The problem is, I'm something like 3-4 in championships....oh what could have been. I think the Bandits are 3-0 in the finale, no? Steve SD Blitz It is Steve what you've written everything correctly. Now you want a further criterion: efficiency Then arises: Bandits: 3 WINS from 3 entries = 100% Blitz: 3 WINS by 7 participations = 42.86% And maybe add f.e.Turtles 0 WINS in 3 Bowls = 0 % But I do think that this list has little meaning. Or am I wrong? Kottan |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2014-06-18 21:35:20 (ID: 100036453) Report Abuse | |
|
Kottan wrote:
Solana_Steve wrote:
The problem is, I'm something like 3-4 in championships....oh what could have been. I think the Bandits are 3-0 in the finale, no? Steve SD Blitz It is Steve what you've written everything correctly. Now you want a further criterion: efficiency Then arises: Bandits: 3 WINS from 3 entries = 100% Blitz: 3 WINS by 7 participations = 42.86% And maybe add f.e.Turtles 0 WINS in 3 Bowls = 0 % But I do think that this list has little meaning. Or am I wrong? Kottan Not really...it's just a measure of conference titles and championship futility. As for Turtles, that's not really a fair number as the game engine was biased against them. :-) Steve SD Blitz |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2014-06-19 08:49:34 (ID: 100036515) Report Abuse | |
|
Solana_Steve wrote:
Kottan wrote:
Solana_Steve wrote:
The problem is, I'm something like 3-4 in championships....oh what could have been. I think the Bandits are 3-0 in the finale, no? Steve SD Blitz It is Steve what you've written everything correctly. Now you want a further criterion: efficiency Then arises: Bandits: 3 WINS from 3 entries = 100% Blitz: 3 WINS by 7 participations = 42.86% And maybe add f.e.Turtles 0 WINS in 3 Bowls = 0 % But I do think that this list has little meaning. Or am I wrong? Kottan Not really...it's just a measure of conference titles and championship futility. As for Turtles, that's not really a fair number as the game engine was biased against them. :-) Steve SD Blitz What are the three better WINS? Blitz with 7 bowl appearances or Bandits with only 3 entries. Or in other words: more bowl appearances or effectiveness is better? I think this is a matter of opinion. Therefore, I would count only the Bowl victories. Because in the end it is only important who is the winner. I don´t want a ranking the runner-ups. Last edited on 2014-06-19 08:49:56 by Kottan |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 2 3 4 5 >| | |
| Main / Galaxy / Eternal Galaxy 1.1 Ranking | |
