Login
no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Suggestions / How to handle substitutions Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< 2 > >| | |
| Rating: | |
| Poster | Message |
|
Toni Gorilla
|
posted: 2012-12-23 18:36:29 (ID: 72991) Report Abuse |
|
Hello there. I like the current substitutions system.
But I would like it to be a little bit more advanced. Here is an easy example: I have 8 equally good OL and LB players and would like to rotate them from the start, therefore I would tic "Based on Fitness / Energy only". The rest of my team has got much better starters than substitutes, and I would like my starters to play at least the first half, therefore I would tic something like "until quarter 3 starts". Dilemma. I can only press either the one or the other button. I would rather like to set up each position individually. Is that possible? |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Toni Gorilla
|
posted: 2012-12-23 18:46:46 (ID: 72992) Report Abuse |
|
Adding the option "set positions individually" besides the current "how to handle substitutions" choices.
Advances set up would look like this: QB - x "based on energy fitness only" x "don't substitute until X quarter starts" WR- x "based on energy fitness only" x "don't substitute until X quarter starts" HB - x "based on erergy fitness only" x "don't substitute until X quarter starts" etc. Last edited on 2012-12-23 22:34:02 by Toni Gorilla |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
E Logic
|
posted: 2012-12-23 21:37:45 (ID: 73003) Report Abuse |
|
this would definately improve the current system
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2012-12-23 21:39:02 (ID: 73004) Report Abuse | |
|
...and make it more complicating.
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Lamumia
|
posted: 2012-12-24 00:11:16 (ID: 73012) Report Abuse |
|
pete wrote:
...and make it more complicating. Which could be solved by keeping the current system, but enabling choosing the suggested system the same way you choose HR. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
ptossell
|
posted: 2012-12-24 00:57:32 (ID: 73020) Report Abuse |
|
Lamumia wrote:
pete wrote:
...and make it more complicating. Which could be solved by keeping the current system, but enabling choosing the suggested system the same way you choose HR.  we need a bit more flexibility here Pete |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Toni Gorilla
|
posted: 2012-12-24 08:45:42 (ID: 73030) Report Abuse |
|
ptossell wrote:
Lamumia wrote:
pete wrote:
...and make it more complicating. Which could be solved by keeping the current system, but enabling choosing the suggested system the same way you choose HR. we need a bit more flexibility here PeteYes, thanks for supporting. C'mon Pete, you cannot diss my suggestions even on Christmas day. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2012-12-24 11:15:37 (ID: 73035) Report Abuse | |
 |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
hosh13
|
posted: 2012-12-24 16:03:09 (ID: 73064) Report Abuse |
|
I am all for this in terms of the basic concept.
But the present options are almost useless imo. You can either have a player in the rotation - or not. The only way to spell your "starters" is to not allow subs until the 4th qtr which introduces the hilarious situation of playing the business end of a game with backups. We need a practical way to spell starters in the middle of games. And then we can talk about it being position specific.  |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
|
Nestoro
|
posted: 2012-12-30 15:41:46 (ID: 73749) Report Abuse |
|
+1
I really like this suggestion, could gives many more strategic variants |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< 2 > >| | |
| Main / Suggestions / How to handle substitutions | |
