no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Rookie Area / Aging Penalty Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 >| | |
| Poster | Message |
| posted: 2025-09-15 05:56:14 (ID: 100193721) Report Abuse | |
|
Either a loophole, or may be he is one of those rare ones who can have their limit higher than 50? I don't remember where, but I am pretty sure Pete has mentioned it somewhere (I've never had one of those though, myself).
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2025-09-15 06:08:38 (ID: 100193722) Report Abuse | |
|
jpnwrt wrote:
Either a loophole, or may be he is one of those rare ones who can have their limit higher than 50? I don't remember where, but I am pretty sure Pete has mentioned it somewhere (I've never had one of those though, myself). I don't think so. Yes, in rare cases a player can have 50.x skill value, but the caps were always full numbers, so 50 in this case. I think the special case here is, that the skill value of this player was not red capped, but close and the reduction happens in same value on skill and cap. Hence the skill stayed close to the cap and the cap itself is reduced from 50 to 48.5. But that's my theory / conclusion and only the next training(s) will show the truth. The case you described would be vice versa. Skill at 50.x, cap at 50, the reduction would bring the player down to whatever, but if the theory of equal reduction fits, the cap would be also reducted and still be below the actual skill. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< < 1 >| | |
| Main / Rookie Area / Aging Penalty | |
