Login
no content
AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting redzoneaction.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Discussions / Question about (Quote-on-Quote) Trades . Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< >| | |
| Poster | Message |
| posted: 2026-01-16 20:13:37 (ID: 100196514) Report Abuse | |
|
Ok, I have a question:
If you want a specific player that is on another team, wanted to decrease the player salary, or anything else that requires wanting to get rid of and acquire a specific player at the same time, is it possible for an owner to message a specific trade offer to another owner and if it involves players then the owners can put them on the transfer market with also letting others know that it is apart of a trade process so that they can understand and leave them be? An example of a trade offer would be: (example, not players for RZA) Offering: John Jonny, LB (Wage 110K) For: Tim Timmy, RB (Wage 30K) & Greg Gregory, CB (Wage 50K) (Both would be put on TM manually by both owners for trade to work and one owner would let others know that it is a part of a trade process). I don't know, it was just a thing on my mind and I didn't know if this should've been on suggestions because I know trades had been suggested before and I want to get others opinion on this idea for trades to semi-work without really needing to put anything extra into the site. Can I get people's opinions on this so I know what to do for the near future 
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2026-01-16 21:49:24 (ID: 100196516) Report Abuse | |
|
There is no trading between 2 parties directly.
Only via transfer market, by offering the player to the market "sell" and then everyone can bid, if they like. If the player receives at least one bid, he will switch the team for that money minus the tax. If no bid was made, he stays and his TC and I think also moral does decrease. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2026-01-17 15:59:02 (ID: 100196527) Report Abuse | |
|
That’s not his point. I think he’s contemplating to have two managers come to the agreement that, once a player is put on the transfer market, only the manager wanting the player puts money on him.
The catch in his proposal, as I understand it, is that there’s a gentlemen’s agreement with all other managers, being once it is somehow made public that it’s a trade between two particular parties/teams no other manager should drive up the price by trying to get the player, too. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2026-01-17 18:21:39 (ID: 100196540) Report Abuse | |
|
Chrill wrote:
That’s not his point. I think he’s contemplating to have two managers come to the agreement that, once a player is put on the transfer market, only the manager wanting the player puts money on him. The catch in his proposal, as I understand it, is that there’s a gentlemen’s agreement with all other managers, being once it is somehow made public that it’s a trade between two particular parties/teams no other manager should drive up the price by trying to get the player, too. You are right, I did oversee that detail. Still, no such stuff is in place and honestly I don't think it ever will be. |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2026-01-23 02:39:24 (ID: 100196660) Report Abuse | |
|
I think it is too messy to work. If it isn't a feature you use and an "agreement" then it gets murky. Some won't care about an agreement. Some might be new and not realize. The only way it would be possible if if Pete had a trade option....which if I remember correctly isn't happening.
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2026-01-23 03:03:29 (ID: 100196662) Report Abuse | |
|
sfniner08 wrote:
I think it is too messy to work. If it isn't a feature you use and an "agreement" then it gets murky. Some won't care about an agreement. Some might be new and not realize. The only way it would be possible if if Pete had a trade option....which if I remember correctly isn't happening. Yeah, It would be cool since it would change the game a lot more and make it in my opinion more fun for some owners, but really it is not my thing to mess with and I just wanted to see if there was another way to do it without the option Avalible. Thanks everyone for answering my question, I will now...uh...find other stuff to do for until Saturday's games I suppose  |
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2026-01-23 12:54:30 (ID: 100196673) Report Abuse | |
|
We hade a trade system in place during the RZA tests back in 2010. It was messy, it caused tension, it was a headache guarantee. We had to establish a veto system to make it work. Overall we ditched it completely before going public. And yes, the source code is still there, even I doubt it would work out of the box today ...
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| posted: 2026-01-23 14:43:01 (ID: 100196679) Report Abuse | |
|
OK when I saw this thread - I understood the item, my thinking is - if you really want another teams player, ask to transfer, or send to Free Agent, Q: why would the other team want a player { or 2 } when the market can bring a better free agent? if it is for a name { My name is Sam Wright, and you have him , can you sell } I get a trade.. but for skills then no.. Understanding that NFL teams trade that way for a Draft too, That I think was reason for the Question..
|
|
| Quote Reply Edit | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< >| | |
| Main / Discussions / Question about (Quote-on-Quote) Trades . | |
