Rank Team Rush-Yards per Fumble
1 Social Distance Runners 822.5
2 Konjarnik HighTowers 792.5
3 Manta Rays 646.7
4 Yorkshire Sea-Owls 640.8
5 Seattle Sea-Reapers 598.3
6 Minnesota Silver Foxes 476.0
7 St Pauli Packers 455.5
8 London Silverbacks 442.0
9 dERBENT CONVICTS 435.3
10 Glasgow Tigers 424.9
11 HAMBURG SEA LIONS 396.4
12 Kraków Conquerors 351.2
13 Wrexham Exiles 316.0
14 Rome Torresina 305.2
15 Minnesota Minotaurs 292.1
16 Northern Storm 292.0
17 Florida seminoles 243.0
18 Gaylord Spartans 236.6
19 Michipicoten Corsairs 235.0
20 Black Knights 228.4
21 PATAGONIA RAPTORS 226.3
22 Devon Warriors 222.6
23 Carolina Blackout 202.9
24 Terrifying Hamsters 175.3
25 Baltimore Blue Crabs 142.2
26 Coconuts 117.5
27 Copenhagen Chargers 106.2
28 Rome Centvrions 103.4
29 Cincinnati Bungals 83.7
30 Downriver Seals 78.8
31 Badalona Cheetahs 56.1
32 Fuenlabrada Falcons 44.3

I'm assuming these number are for offensive turnovers?

Rank Team Forced Fumble Recovery Rate
1 Social Distance Runners 1.500
2 dERBENT CONVICTS 1.250
3 St Pauli Packers 1.000
4 PATAGONIA RAPTORS 1.000
5 Terrifying Hamsters 1.000
6 Manta Rays 1.000
7 Florida seminoles 0.889
8 Black Knights 0.875
9 Carolina Blackout 0.857
10 Seattle Sea-Reapers 0.857
11 Konjarnik HighTowers 0.818
12 Kraków Conquerors 0.818
13 Michipicoten Corsairs 0.778
14 Devon Warriors 0.778
15 Yorkshire Sea-Owls 0.750
16 Northern Storm 0.750
17 Glasgow Tigers 0.727
18 Minnesota Silver Foxes 0.714
19 Wrexham Exiles 0.667
20 London Silverbacks 0.667
21 Minnesota Minotaurs 0.625
22 Rome Centvrions 0.571
23 Baltimore Blue Crabs 0.571
24 Gaylord Spartans 0.571
25 HAMBURG SEA LIONS 0.400
26 Badalona Cheetahs 0.333
27 Rome Torresina 0.286
28 Fuenlabrada Falcons 0.286
29 Cincinnati Bungals 0.250
30 Copenhagen Chargers 0.167
31 Downriver Seals 0.167
32 Coconuts 0.000

Yes, every 142 rushyards you fumble the ball and for every 205 pass-yards you're throwing one interception

I’m not very surprised to see the numbers backing my impression that we just don’t take the ball away often enough

Alabama Nomads
Alabama Nomads play a steady, balanced game with cautious passing and controlled rushing. They focus on sustaining drives, minimizing turnovers, and exploiting opponent mistakes opportunistically. Their scoring is consistent but rarely explosive, relying on structured execution rather than big plays. Defensively, they prevent major swings but don’t dominate physically. Overall, they manage games pragmatically, emphasizing consistency over flair. **NFL Analogue:** Indianapolis Colts.

Badalona Cheetahs
Badalona Cheetahs operate a high-risk, high-reward offense that is heavily pass-oriented. They rely on creating explosive plays but struggle with efficiency and turnovers, leading to unpredictable outcomes. Their defense can force fumbles but rarely dominates possession. Overall, their style favors volatility and opportunistic scoring. **NFL Analogue:** Jacksonville Jaguars.

Baltimore Blue Crabs
Baltimore Blue Crabs favor passing with moderate rushing support and play pragmatically to stay competitive. They rely on opportunistic defense to convert opponent mistakes into scoring chances. Offensive efficiency is moderate, and they often depend on situational execution. Their games are controlled, emphasizing stability over explosive performance. **NFL Analogue:** Detroit Lions.

Black Knights
Black Knights employ disciplined, methodical play, leaning slightly toward passing. Their ball security is strong, though scoring is moderate. They create turnovers opportunistically without dominating defensively. Their offense rarely produces explosive drives but remains competitive through consistency. **NFL Analogue:** New England Patriots.

Blaze
Blaze favor a pass-heavy, high-risk offense with occasional rushing bursts. Efficiency is inconsistent, and turnovers can hinder scoring. They rely on explosive plays to generate momentum, but defensive opportunism is limited. Overall, they are a volatile team capable of surprises but lacking consistency. **NFL Analogue:** Las Vegas Raiders.

Carolina Blackout
Carolina Blackout combines moderate passing with reliable rushing and emphasizes ball security. They create defensive opportunities situationally and maintain balanced play. Scoring is steady, relying on structured drives rather than long, explosive plays. Overall, they play pragmatically with a controlled offensive approach. **NFL Analogue:** New Orleans Saints.

Cincinnati Bungals
Cincinnati Bungals are pass-heavy but struggle to convert yardage into efficient scoring. Their rushing attack is limited, and turnovers can reduce their effectiveness. Defensive opportunism is modest, making consistency a challenge. Their games often hinge on big plays, making results variable. **NFL Analogue:** Chicago Bears.

Copenhagen Chargers
Copenhagen Chargers lean heavily on passing while lacking a strong rushing component. Turnovers and red-zone inefficiency limit consistent scoring. Defensive opportunism is low, making momentum swings critical to success. Overall, they adopt a high-risk, high-volume aerial attack. **NFL Analogue:** New York Jets.

Devon Warriors
Devon Warriors play a pass-oriented offense complemented by moderate rushing. They protect the ball well and exploit turnovers opportunistically. Scoring efficiency is moderate, requiring careful execution to sustain drives. Their style emphasizes structured, calculated play with limited reliance on explosive plays. **NFL Analogue:** Philadelphia Eagles.

Downriver Seals
Downriver Seals favor a conservative offensive scheme, often struggling to generate big plays. Their passing is high-risk and inefficient, while the rushing game is limited. Defensive turnovers are infrequent, making scoring opportunities scarce. Overall, they rely on careful management to stay competitive. **NFL Analogue:** New York Giants.

Fika och Chill
Fika och Chill maintain a balanced but cautious offense, with moderate contributions from both passing and rushing. Turnovers are managed but scoring efficiency is modest. Their defense is opportunistic but rarely dominant. Overall, they focus on steady, methodical football, minimizing mistakes over creating big plays. **NFL Analogue:** Buffalo Bills.

Florida seminoles
Florida seminoles combine secure rushing with moderate passing. They protect the ball well and capitalize on turnovers occasionally. Scoring is steady but rarely explosive. Overall, they adopt a controlled approach, focusing on ball security and efficient drives rather than high-risk plays. **NFL Analogue:** Atlanta Falcons.

Gaylord Spartans
Gaylord Spartans favor a cautious passing strategy with moderate rushing. They capitalize on defensive mistakes but struggle to dominate consistently. Scoring efficiency is modest, and their games are controlled. Overall, they rely on situational opportunism and risk-averse execution. **NFL Analogue:** Arizona Cardinals.

Glasgow Tigers
Glasgow Tigers maintain a balanced offense with a slight passing preference. They are efficient in converting yardage into scores while protecting the ball. Defensive opportunism complements offensive efficiency. Overall, their style blends controlled execution with occasional big plays. **NFL Analogue:** Green Bay Packers.

HAMBURG SEA LIONS
HAMBURG SEA LIONS combine passing and rushing effectively with a ball-control philosophy. Turnovers are minimized, and defensive opportunism is moderate. They favor consistent drives over explosive scoring but remain highly competitive. Overall, they play a methodical and disciplined style. **NFL Analogue:** Baltimore Ravens.

Kraków Conquerors
Kraków Conquerors rely on aggressive passing complemented by moderate rushing. They create turnovers but are less efficient in converting yardage into points. Their style favors explosive plays over sustained drives. Overall, they are high-variance, opportunistic, and capable of surprising stronger teams. **NFL Analogue:** Minnesota Vikings.

Konjarnik HighTowers
Konjarnik HighTowers emphasize a pass-heavy offense with strong rushing security. They exploit turnovers efficiently and convert yardage into scoring effectively. Their play is disciplined, balancing opportunistic defense with controlled offense. Overall, they are methodical and reliable, with occasional bursts of aggression. **NFL Analogue:** Kansas City Chiefs.

London Silverbacks
London Silverbacks employ a balanced offensive scheme with moderate passing and secure rushing. They are efficient but rarely explosive. Defensive opportunism is situational, and scoring relies on structured execution. Overall, they favor consistency and controlled play. **NFL Analogue:** Los Angeles Chargers.

Manta Rays
Manta Rays operate a pass-heavy offense with highly secure rushing. They capitalize on turnovers effectively and play opportunistically on defense. While yardage gains are strong, touchdown conversion on the ground can lag. Overall, they combine strategic passing with risk-managed explosive plays. **NFL Analogue:** Seattle Seahawks.

Michipicoten Corsairs
Michipicoten Corsairs run an extremely pass-heavy offense with limited rushing. They are high-risk, generating yardage but struggling to convert consistently into touchdowns. Defensive opportunism is moderate. Overall, their style is aggressive and high-variance, reliant on near-perfect passing execution. **NFL Analogue:** Chicago Bears.

Minnesota Minotaurs
Minnesota Minotaurs favor balanced but slightly pass-oriented play. They are moderately efficient and create situational defensive advantages. Rushing provides support for controlled drives. Overall, they prioritize consistency and careful game management over explosive plays. **NFL Analogue:** Cleveland Browns.

Minnesota Silver Foxes
Minnesota Silver Foxes maintain a balanced offense with cautious passing and reliable rushing. Turnover risk is moderate, and scoring efficiency is steady but unspectacular. Their style is controlled and risk-averse. Overall, they rely on careful game management and situational advantage. **NFL Analogue:** Tennessee Titans.

Northern Storm
Northern Storm plays an aggressive, pass-heavy style with supporting rushes. Turnovers are a concern, and scoring efficiency can be inconsistent. They rely on high-risk aerial plays to generate points. Overall, their style is opportunistic and explosive but vulnerable to disciplined defenses. **NFL Analogue:** Buffalo Bills.

PATAGONIA RAPTORS
PATAGONIA RAPTORS are extremely pass-oriented, generating large yardage but prone to turnovers. Their rushing game is minimal, making them vulnerable to strong defenses. Offensive efficiency is inconsistent, relying on explosive plays. Overall, their style is high-risk and aggressive. **NFL Analogue:** Detroit Lions.

Rome Centvrions
Rome Centvrions maintain moderate passing with limited rushing. They are conservative with the ball and defensive opportunism is modest. Their offense favors structured drives over explosive scoring. Overall, they play pragmatically, often struggling against more efficient opponents. **NFL Analogue:** New York Giants.

Rome Torresina
Rome Torresina blends a pass-heavy attack with moderate rushing. Turnovers can limit efficiency, though they are opportunistic defensively. Scoring depends on controlled execution combined with occasional big plays. Overall, they are high-risk but strategic, capable of bursts of success. **NFL Analogue:** Philadelphia Eagles.

St Pauli Packers
St Pauli Packers favor a balanced offense slightly inclined toward passing. Turnovers are minimized, and scoring efficiency is solid. Defensive opportunism complements the offense. Overall, they combine control with occasional big plays. **NFL Analogue:** Green Bay Packers.

Seattle Sea-Reapers
Seattle Sea-Reapers rely on pass-heavy drives supplemented by solid rushing. Scoring is efficient, and turnovers are moderate. Defensive opportunism provides occasional advantages. Their style blends controlled execution with selective high-risk plays. **NFL Analogue:** Seattle Seahawks.

Social Distance Runners
Social Distance Runners balance high-efficiency passing with secure rushing and elite turnover control. They convert yardage into touchdowns effectively and maintain consistency across home and away games. Defensive opportunism is maximized, creating additional scoring chances. Their style is methodical, balanced, and highly efficient. **NFL Analogue:** Kansas City Chiefs.

Terrifying Hamsters
Terrifying Hamsters favor a pass-oriented offense supported by moderate rushing. Defensive opportunism is present but not dominant. Scoring efficiency is variable, requiring precise execution. Overall, they combine risk-managed aggression with occasional explosive plays. **NFL Analogue:** Arizona Cardinals.

Wrexham Exiles
Wrexham Exiles blend slightly pass-heavy play with reliable rushing. Turnovers are well-managed, and scoring efficiency is consistent. They exploit opponent mistakes opportunistically. Overall, they are balanced, methodical, and capable of controlled success. **NFL Analogue:** Green Bay Packers.

Yorkshire Sea-Owls
Yorkshire Sea-Owls use a balanced approach with moderate passing and secure rushing. Defensive opportunism allows situational scoring advantages. Their offense is steady but rarely explosive. Overall, they prioritize consistency and careful execution. **NFL Analogue:** Minnesota Vikings.

This ranking somehow combines pancakes, broken tackles, and interceptions thrown.

1. Konjarnik HighTowers – 90
2. Glasgow Tigers – 89
3. St Pauli Packers – 83
4. Social Distance Runners – 78
5. HAMBURG SEA LIONS – 75
6. London Silverbacks – 74
7. Wrexham Exiles – 69
8. Kraków Conquerors – 60
9. Devon Warriors – 57
10. Manta Rays – 56
11. Yorkshire Sea-Owls – 55
12. Carolina Blackout – 54
13. Terrifying Hamsters – 48
14. Gaylord Spartans – 47
15. Seattle Sea-Reapers – 45
16. Black Knights – 43
17. Minnesota Minotaurs – 42
18. Florida Seminoles – 41
19. Baltimore Blue Crabs – 36
20. Northern Storm – 35
21. Rome Torresina – 33
22. Coconuts – 32
23. Minnesota Silver Foxes – 30
24. Rome Centvrions – 29
25. Michipicoten Corsairs – 28
26. dERBENT CONVICTS – 26
27. Copenhagen Chargers – 21
28. Downriver Seals – 20
29. Cincinnati Bungals – 18
30. Fuenlabrada Falcons – 14
31. PATAGONIA RAPTORS – 13
32. Badalona Cheetahs – 9

This ranking combines sacks, interceptions, TfL and tackles.

1. Social Distance Runners – 123
2. Glasgow Tigers – 116
3. Konjarnik HighTowers – 113
4. London Silverbacks – 109
5. Yorkshire Sea-Owls – 106
6. Manta Rays – 101
7. HAMBURG SEA LIONS – 97
8. Terrifying Hamsters – 96
9. Gaylord Spartans – 95
10. Northern Storm – 94
11. Wrexham Exiles – 92
12. Baltimore Blue Crabs – 91
13. St Pauli Packers – 89
14. Kraków Conquerors – 88
15. Seattle Sea-Reapers – 86
16. Rome Centvrions – 84
17. Michipicoten Corsairs – 82
18. Carolina Blackout – 79
19. Rome Torresina – 78
20. Devon Warriors – 74
21. Florida Seminoles – 72
22. PATAGONIA RAPTORS – 70
23. Minnesota Minotaurs – 69
24. dERBENT CONVICTS – 68
25. Cincinnati Bungals – 63
26. Downriver Seals – 61
27. Copenhagen Chargers – 60
28. Coconuts – 50
29. Minnesota Silver Foxes – 48
30. Fuenlabrada Falcons – 45
31. Badalona Cheetahs – 42
32. Cincinnati Bungals – 40